Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au> writes:
> I'll check with SCO
That's a good idea. Please let us know what they say.
Sincerely,
Michael Sokolov
Phone: 440-449-0299 (Home) 216-217-2579 (Cellular)
ARPA Internet SMTP mail: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA06533
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 13:07:12 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
Rick Copeland <rickgc(a)calweb.com> writes:
> I have just put BSD Network Version 2 up on Minnie in the incoming
> directory.
Warren, I think this one should go into minnie's anonymous FTP area,
since it does not require a UNIX license and was specifically designed to
be publicly distributable. I didn't do any repacking on it in my home
directory, since it's just one big tarball. I've done a tar tvf on the
tarball, though, and the listing produced is in /usr/home/msokolov/NET2.lst
on minnie.
Sincerely,
Michael Sokolov
Phone: 440-449-0299 (Home) 216-217-2579 (Cellular)
ARPA Internet SMTP mail: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA05240
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 09:16:26 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au> Tue Nov 24 08:17:39 1998
Received: from henry.cs.adfa.oz.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA05234
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 09:16:14 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au)
Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA03246; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 09:17:39 +1100 (EST)
From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199811232217.JAA03246(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Subject: Re: 4.3/4.4 IBM distributions (need history)
To: rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 09:17:39 +1100 (EST)
Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (PDP Unix Preservation)
In-Reply-To: <199811231709.MAA09886(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> from "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" at "Nov 23, 98 12:09:28 pm"
Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
In article by User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys:
> I am curious, though, about the releases of BSD for the old RT.
> I have uncovered three discrete distributions, one labelled IBM,
> and two non-labelled, but which were apparently out of IBM or related
> to IBM in some way, maybe after IBM dropped AOS, but I am not sure.
> The background of it all is a mystery.
>
> Is there any interest on the list to archive the ports that I have?
> Warren?
I tell you what, Bob. I'll mirror whatever you've got :-)
But you'll have to organise it and write the READMEs!
Warren
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA05265
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 09:18:02 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au> Tue Nov 24 08:19:29 1998
Received: from henry.cs.adfa.oz.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA05260
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 09:17:55 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au)
Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA03263 for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 09:19:30 +1100 (EST)
From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199811232219.JAA03263(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Subject: 4BSD bloat
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 09:19:29 +1100 (EST)
Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
In-Reply-To: <199811231747.MAA16896(a)skybridge.scl.cwru.edu> from Michael Sokolov at "Nov 23, 98 12:47:58 pm"
Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
In article by Michael Sokolov:
>I have heard jokes that CSRG got Microsoft to rewrite 90% of the code for them.
>Seriously, though, the bloat starts in Reno and really gets out of hand in 4.4.
>The sources are bloated just as much as the binaries, so I wouldn't blame it
>just on the compiler or the libraries.
I can hear Steven Schultz say that the address space limitations of a
16-bit architecture help to minimise software bloat :-)
Warren
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA05725
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 10:44:18 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From Rick Copeland <rickgc(a)calweb.com> Tue Nov 24 09:53:48 1998
Received: from mail.calweb.com (mail.calweb.com [208.131.56.12])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA05720
for <pups(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 10:44:03 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from rickgc(a)calweb.com)
Received: by mail.calweb.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id PAA01899;
Mon, 23 Nov 1998 15:43:52 -0800 (PST)
X-SMTP: helo rgc from rickgc(a)calweb.com server @12.22.0.83 ip 12.22.0.83
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19981123155338.00935c40(a)pop.calweb.com>
X-Sender: rickgc(a)pop.calweb.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 15:53:48 -0800
To: pups(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU
From: Rick Copeland <rickgc(a)calweb.com>
Subject: Upload BSD4.3 Rev. 2, Foreign Master
Cc: wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
Dear PUPS list,
I have up loaded to Minnie the "BSD4.3 Revision 2 for VAX, Foreign Master"
passed to me by
Mr. Kirk McKusick. This tape image is zipped with WinZip 6.22 and includes
a readme file.
Sincerely,
Rick Copeland
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA06184
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 12:03:08 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au> Tue Nov 24 11:04:26 1998
Received: from henry.cs.adfa.oz.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA06179
for <pups(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 12:02:58 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au)
Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA03819; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 12:04:26 +1100 (EST)
From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199811240104.MAA03819(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Upload BSD4.3 Rev. 2, Foreign Master
To: rickgc(a)calweb.com (Rick Copeland)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 12:04:26 +1100 (EST)
Cc: pups(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19981123155338.00935c40(a)pop.calweb.com> from Rick Copeland at "Nov 23, 98 03:53:48 pm"
Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
In article by Rick Copeland:
> Dear PUPS list,
>
> I have up loaded to Minnie the "BSD4.3 Revision 2 for VAX, Foreign Master"
> passed to me by Kirk McKusick.
> Rick Copeland
It's now available in Distributions/4bsd/43rev2 in the PUPS Archive.
Warren
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA06315
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 12:21:31 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From James Lothian <simul8(a)simul8.demon.co.uk> Tue Nov 24 11:15:24 1998
Received: from post.mail.demon.net (post-20.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.27])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA06309
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 12:21:22 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from simul8(a)simul8.demon.co.uk)
Received: from [212.228.120.103] (helo=SONAR)
by post.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.053 #1)
id 0zi7AG-0001Y2-00
for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 01:21:12 +0000
Received: by SONAR with Microsoft Mail
id <01BE1748.F7E9EE60@SONAR>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 01:22:57 -0000
Message-ID: <01BE1748.F7E9EE60@SONAR>
From: James Lothian <simul8(a)simul8.demon.co.uk>
To: "pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au" <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>
Subject: RE: 4.3-VAX distributions
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 01:15:24 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
Just thought I'd throw my oar in: my 11/750 is currently running a version
of 4.3 taken off a set of tapes I saved from being thrown out by a Uni
department I used to work for. The labels on the tapes say:
Ultrix
4.3+NFS Wisconsin UNIX 1/15/87
And another label says:
* The contents of this tape are distributed to UNIX/32V,
System 3 or System 5, and SUN 3.0 NFS licencees only,
subject to your software agreement with AT&T (Western
Electric), your license agreement with the Regents of the
University of California, and your license agreement with
SUN Microsystems.
* The University of Wisconsin - Madison Computer System
Laboratory assumes no responsibility for unauthorized use
of these contents by non-licensed entities.
RCS strings seem to indicate that the code was maintained by
someone called Tad Lebeck.
As far as I can tell, it's mainly a fairly stock early 4.3 with no disk-labels,
with all the sun rpc/yp/nfs stuff grafted on and a whole lot of bugs that
I've had no end of fun fixing.
Does anybody know anything about the history of this version? In particular,
does it bear any real relation to Ultrix, or is the tape just mis-labelled?
If anybody else out there is running this thing and wonders why ptrace(2) causes
such mayhem, or why portmap crashes when they try to run YP, I'd be happy to
supply patches....
James
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA06440
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 12:49:02 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From "Eric Edwards" <eekg(a)ix.netcom.com> Tue Nov 24 11:40:51 1998
Received: from dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.10])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA06435
for <PUPS(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 12:48:44 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from eekg(a)ix.netcom.com)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
by dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
id TAA20720 for <PUPS(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU>; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 19:48:00 -0600 (CST)
Received: from roc-ny1-13.ix.netcom.com(199.183.209.45) by dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3)
id rma020559; Mon Nov 23 19:47:10 1998
Message-ID: <002e01be174b$8a9ec6c0$2dd1b7c7(a)#eekg.ix.netcom.com>
From: "Eric Edwards" <eekg(a)ix.netcom.com>
To: <PUPS(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU>
Subject: Re: What *was* the Tahoe?
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 20:40:51 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
The Power 6/32 Tahoe was a product of Computer Consoles Inc. (CCI). The
internal codename was "Tahoe", as all the CCI processors were named after
lakes in the US (others I can remember were Erie and Huron). It was
originally intended to compete with the VAX-11/780 - depending on the
benchmark it was 5 to 10 times faster than the VAX and much smaller and
cheaper.
The base processor consisted of 5 boards - implemented with AMD 2900 series
bit slice processors, PLAs and 74F series parts. Surprisingly the bit-slice
processors were used in the MMU - the actual ALU was 74F181s. It was a big
endian machine that was sort of a cross between a VAX and a Motorola 68K.
As mentioned elsewhere, it is rumored that if you swap the nibbles in the
instruction bytes they end up the same as the VAX...
I think it also had some odd features: the cache was on the processor side
of the mmu -- so it was indexed by virtual address and instructions were
cached in microcode form.
As guessed from the lack of boot blocks, there was another board in the
system -- the Console Processor (CP). It was a 68000 based Versabus single
board computer. The boot monitor understood BSD filesystems on both tape
and disk. It basically loaded the microcode into the CPU, loaded the boot
image (/boot?) into memory, and then started the main CPU.
CCI ported 4.2BSD to run on the Tahoe and the changes were rolled into the
4.3-Tahoe version. They also ran System V (including a dual processor
version) and CCI's own fault-tolerant Unix - Perpos.
I think the last of the Berkeley Tahoe machines ended up at Rochester
Institute of Technology's Computer Science House (http://www.csh.rit.edu)
Some guys up there were attempting to do some work with 4.4BSD and the
Tahoe.
I can probably dig up more information if anyone needs it...
-----Original Message-----
From: SHOPPA(a)trailing-edge.com <SHOPPA(a)trailing-edge.com>
To: PUPS(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU <PUPS(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU>
Date: Sunday, November 22, 1998 6:47 PM
Subject: What *was* the Tahoe?
> What is the "Tahoe"?
>Tim. (shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com)
>
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA06491
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 13:04:41 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From SHOPPA(a)trailing-edge.com <SHOPPA(a)trailing-edge.com> Sun Nov 22 18:47:00 1998
Received: from cornelius.INS.CWRU.Edu (root(a)cornelius.INS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.8.216])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA06486
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 13:04:32 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu)
Received: from k2.cwru.edu (k2.SCL.CWRU.Edu [129.22.32.50]) by cornelius.INS.CWRU.Edu with SMTP (8.8.8+cwru/CWRU-3.4)
id VAA13725; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 21:04:27 -0500 (EST) (from mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>)
Received: from skybridge.scl.cwru.edu by k2.cwru.edu (8.6.12/SMI-SVR4)
id VAA27293; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 21:08:09 -0500
Received: by skybridge.scl.cwru.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id VAA17227; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 21:17:16 -0500
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 21:17:16 -0500
From: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu (Michael Sokolov)
Message-Id: <199811240217.VAA17227(a)skybridge.scl.cwru.edu>
To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Subject: Re: BSD Network Version 2 upload
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
J. Joseph Max Katz <jkatz(a)cpio.net> writes:
> Does Net/2 produce a completely working binary system?
No. It contains only the sources, and if you try to build it, you'll get
stuck immediately because about half of the source files were simply
deleted.
Sincerely,
Michael Sokolov
Phone: 440-449-0299 (Home) 216-217-2579 (Cellular)
ARPA Internet SMTP mail: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA06512
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 13:05:26 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
< U.S. called Tahoe/Reno. The BSD developers probably thought "OK, we alre
< have Tahoe, let's have Reno too." Reno also probably stands for
< "renovation", although IMHO sawing the branch you are sitting on is pret
< damn stupid and certainly doesn't qualify as "renovation".
Tahoe is Lake Tahoe California, Reno is in Nevada. The connection is
the two of the cities are connected by I80, The same road you'd take to
get from Boston to Berkeley. Lake Tahoe is a resort area in the mountains
about 50miles (or so) west of Reno.
In those cities sawing the branch your sitting on may well be a paying
bet or a reason to party.
Allison
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id HAA04837
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 07:25:36 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From Rick Copeland <rickgc(a)calweb.com> Tue Nov 24 06:34:05 1998
Received: from mail.calweb.com (mail.calweb.com [208.131.56.12])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA04832
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 07:25:22 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from rickgc(a)calweb.com)
Received: by mail.calweb.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id MAA02213;
Mon, 23 Nov 1998 12:24:11 -0800 (PST)
X-SMTP: helo rgc from rickgc(a)calweb.com server @12.22.0.83 ip 12.22.0.83
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19981123123403.0091b220(a)pop.calweb.com>
X-Sender: rickgc(a)pop.calweb.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 12:34:05 -0800
To: allisonp(a)world.std.com (Allison J Parent), pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
From: Rick Copeland <rickgc(a)calweb.com>
Subject: Re: Reno (was Re: What *was* the Tahoe?)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
At 02:37 PM 11/23/98 -0500, Allison J Parent wrote:
>< U.S. called Tahoe/Reno. The BSD developers probably thought "OK, we alre
>< have Tahoe, let's have Reno too." Reno also probably stands for
>< "renovation", although IMHO sawing the branch you are sitting on is pret
>< damn stupid and certainly doesn't qualify as "renovation".
>
>Tahoe is Lake Tahoe California, Reno is in Nevada. The connection is
>the two of the cities are connected by I80, The same road you'd take to
>get from Boston to Berkeley. Lake Tahoe is a resort area in the mountains
>about 50miles (or so) west of Reno.
>
>In those cities sawing the branch your sitting on may well be a paying
>bet or a reason to party.
>
>Allison
Well since I live so close to Lake Tahoe and Reno (Sacramento is half way
between Tahoe and Berkeley) I have got to get my two cents in here. My
guess is that Berkeley is well known as a pro party University and Reno and
Tahoe are the main party spots on the west cost! Sounds right to me!
Rick
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id IAA04939
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 08:04:14 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
Tim Shoppa <SHOPPA(a)trailing-edge.com> writes:
> That's useful. The Tahoe-specific documentation also mentions
> the Harris HCX-7, the Unisys 7000/40, and ICL Clan 7 - were
> these in any way compatible with the Tahoe, or just "other"
> ports?
Well, they have to be compatible somehow, since the same BSD tape was
used for all of them. Actually, there is much more to it. The Tahoe
architecture was specifically designed for BSD. CCI first made a vendor
release for their machines, kinda like SunOS and Ultrix, based on 4.2BSD.
Then some time after the 4.3BSD release CSRG designed to integrate CCI's
changes into the mainstream BSD tree. The result was named 4.3BSD-Tahoe.
What's interesting is that 4.3BSD-Tahoe does not have any bootblocks for
the Tahoe architecture, and the documentation often refers to the BSD
kernels being loaded by the system ROM on Tahoe. As you can imagine, having
the system ROM load your OS's kernels is one hell of a requirement, and the
Harris and Unisys machines would have to REALLY compatible with the CCI for
this to work. My guess would be that they were identical clones, just like
the PC clones that run unmodified PC-DOS.
> And where does "Reno" come from, while we're at it?
If I'm not mistaken, there is a city somewhere on the west side of the
U.S. called Tahoe/Reno. The BSD developers probably thought "OK, we already
have Tahoe, let's have Reno too." Reno also probably stands for
"renovation", although IMHO sawing the branch you are sitting on is pretty
damn stupid and certainly doesn't qualify as "renovation".
Sincerely,
Michael Sokolov
Phone: 440-449-0299 (Home) 216-217-2579 (Cellular)
ARPA Internet SMTP mail: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id FAA04486
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 05:49:13 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" <rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> Tue Nov 24 04:42:50 1998
Received: from seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.88.4])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA04481
for <pups(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 05:49:04 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu)
Received: (from rdkeys@localhost)
by seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA10244;
Mon, 23 Nov 1998 13:42:50 -0500 (EST)
(envelope-from rdkeys)
From: "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" <rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199811231842.NAA10244(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: 4.3/4.4 IBM distributions (need history)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.981123125810.17938D-100000(a)grant.transarc.com> from Pat Barron at "Nov 23, 98 01:05:13 pm"
To: pat(a)transarc.com (Pat Barron)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 13:42:50 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pups(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
> I think there were some additional licensing restrictions on AOS (e.g.,
> only available to educational institutions), so it might not be
> includable in the archive. I can probably track down folks in Palo Alto
> who worked AOS, and find out.
It might be good to find out any info or history or whatever, if anyone
still knows anything. If IBM does not particularly want it, it might
be nice to add to the archives, as an educational one-up on Gates.
> As far as I know, there was never an "official" ACIS release beyond the
> 1988 4.3BSD release. I have actual distribution tapes around somewhere,
> and could probably make tape images available if it's determined that
> that's OK.
Then what are the `Reno' and `Lite' builds that I have. I was assuming
they were all related, or were there other ports done outside IBM?
Now I am less clear on what it is I actually have......
> P.S. We just dumpster-ized about 6 or 8 RTs from our storage facility
> in the last couple of weeks - I had tried to give them away, but
> the person who was lined up to take them didn't move quite fast
> enough, and the person assigned to storage clean-up got tired of
> having them around ... :-(
Darn! Always one step behind and two weeks late.....
If there are any leftover AOS docs, or any leftover boards, particularly
the external ESDI, SCSI, TAPE, or ethernet boards, or any leftover mice,
that would be nice to locate. Also, a spare tape drive would not hurt.
Dupster fodder......(:+{{.....
Bob Keys
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id GAA04591
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 06:17:42 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From Rick Copeland <rickgc(a)calweb.com> Tue Nov 24 05:27:21 1998
Received: from mail.calweb.com (mail.calweb.com [208.131.56.12])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA04586
for <pups(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 06:17:33 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from rickgc(a)calweb.com)
Received: by mail.calweb.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id LAA10904
for <pups(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU>; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:17:27 -0800 (PST)
X-SMTP: helo rgc from rickgc(a)calweb.com server @12.22.0.83 ip 12.22.0.83
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19981123112715.0092ed20(a)pop.calweb.com>
X-Sender: rickgc(a)pop.calweb.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:27:21 -0800
To: pups(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU
From: Rick Copeland <rickgc(a)calweb.com>
Subject: BSD Network Version 2 upload
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
PUPS List,
I have just put BSD Network Version 2 up on Minnie in the incoming
directory. This is from a
tape passed to me from Mr. Kirk McKusick. The file includes a readme and
is zipped with WinZip
version 6.22.
Sincerely,
Rick Copeland
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id GAA04712
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 06:37:33 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
Dave Horsfall <dave(a)fgh.geac.com.au> writes:
> And, as I recall (I used to work for STC Australia who sold 'em) it
> had the instruction set of a Vax [...]
Aha! I always suspected that the Tahoe architecture was somehow related
to VAXen, I just didn't know how. Now we all know...
> [...] but backwards, if you know what I
> mean...
I have noticed that the Tahoe architecture is big-endian (I use this to
easily tell between VAX and Tahoe binaries and filesystem dumps). Is this
what you mean? Or is there any more backwardness?
> The CPU was five boards, something like integer card plus
> FPU card plus priority arbitrator card etc.
At least the FPU card was optional, since the Tahoe code in BSD has a
emulator for it.
Sincerely,
Michael Sokolov
Phone: 440-449-0299 (Home) 216-217-2579 (Cellular)
ARPA Internet SMTP mail: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id FAA04317
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 05:07:56 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
Steven M. Schultz <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> writes:
> GCC2 on a 9mb machine isn't a pretty sight so pcc is actually a "good
> thing" ;)
It's _ALWAYS_ a good thing, because it's DIVINE (written by Bell Labs
Gods themselves), while gcc and others are mere mortals. Actually, gcc is
even worse than a mere mortal, since it's GNU. It comes directly from the
Inferno.
Sincerely,
Michael Sokolov
Phone: 440-449-0299 (Home) 216-217-2579 (Cellular)
ARPA Internet SMTP mail: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id FAA04343
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 05:09:07 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
"User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" <rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> writes:
> I am curious, though, about the releases of BSD for the old RT.
The University of California at Berkeley has never made any releases for IBM RT
and nor will I, so there are no BSD releases for IBM RT.
> There really is
> a large bloat between the 4.3 and 4.4 levels in my stuff, too. What
> is responsible for the differences in the bloat?
I have heard jokes that CSRG got Microsoft to rewrite 90% of the code for them.
Seriously, though, the bloat starts in Reno and really gets out of hand in 4.4.
The sources are bloated just as much as the binaries, so I wouldn't blame it
just on the compiler or the libraries.
Sincerely,
Michael Sokolov
Phone: 440-449-0299 (Home) 216-217-2579 (Cellular)
ARPA Internet SMTP mail: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id FAA04299
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 05:06:39 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From Pat Barron <pat(a)transarc.com> Tue Nov 24 04:05:13 1998
Received: from mailhost2.transarc.com (mailhost2.transarc.com [158.98.14.14])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA04294
for <pups(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 05:06:23 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from pat(a)transarc.com)
Received: from grant.transarc.com (grant.transarc.com [158.98.16.11]) by mailhost2.transarc.com (8.8.0/8.8.0) with SMTP id NAA05380; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 13:05:14 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 13:05:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Pat Barron <pat(a)transarc.com>
To: "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" <rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: pups(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU
Subject: Re: 4.3/4.4 IBM distributions (need history)
In-Reply-To: <199811231709.MAA09886(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.981123125810.17938D-100000(a)grant.transarc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
I think there were some additional licensing restrictions on AOS (e.g.,
only available to educational institutions), so it might not be
includable in the archive. I can probably track down folks in Palo Alto
who worked AOS, and find out.
As far as I know, there was never an "official" ACIS release beyond the
1988 4.3BSD release. I have actual distribution tapes around somewhere,
and could probably make tape images available if it's determined that
that's OK.
--Pat.
P.S. We just dumpster-ized about 6 or 8 RTs from our storage facility
in the last couple of weeks - I had tried to give them away, but
the person who was lined up to take them didn't move quite fast
enough, and the person assigned to storage clean-up got tired of
having them around ... :-(
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id FAA04329
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 05:08:33 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>Tahoe was the internal "code" name that Computer Consoles Inc used
>for their Power 6/32 processor.
That's useful. The Tahoe-specific documentation also mentions
the Harris HCX-7, the Unisys 7000/40, and ICL Clan 7 - were
these in any way compatible with the Tahoe, or just "other"
ports?
And where does "Reno" come from, while we're at it?
Tim. (shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com)
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id EAA04103
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 04:15:51 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" <rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> Tue Nov 24 03:09:28 1998
Received: from seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.88.4])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA04098
for <pups(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 04:15:43 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu)
Received: (from rdkeys@localhost)
by seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA09886;
Mon, 23 Nov 1998 12:09:28 -0500 (EST)
(envelope-from rdkeys)
From: "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" <rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199811231709.MAA09886(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: 4.3/4.4 IBM distributions (need history)
In-Reply-To: <199811220509.AAA16197(a)skybridge.scl.cwru.edu> from Michael Sokolov at "Nov 22, 98 00:09:52 am"
To: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu (Michael Sokolov)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 12:09:28 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pups(a)MINNIE.CS.ADFA.EDU.AU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
> > We all know now that Michael's on a crusade for 4.3-Tahoe, so would it be
> > completely unreasonable to build 4.3-Tahoe from sources under 4.3-Reno?
> > It's the most reasonable approach I can think of at the moment.
>
> That's close to what I'm doing. There are two differences, though.
> First, I'm using Ultrix as my cross-compilation base, not 4.3BSD-Reno. (I
> would say there is less of a gap between 4.3BSD-Tahoe and Ultrix than
> between Tahoe and Reno. The latter is really huge, it's a gap between True
> UNIX(R) and a bloated and POSIXized fallen one.) Second, what I will be
> building won't be plain Tahoe, it will be Quasijarus1, i.e., Tahoe plus
> KA650 support and shadow passwords from Reno and other improvements from
> both later CSRG code and my own brain. SCCS will be the #1 tool in the
> process.
Speaking of crusades.....(:+}}.... I sometimes feel like the orphan
child running BSD on the old IBM RT (I know, not a biggie vaxen iron,
but that is what I have and the cap that I don). It is not too
bad running 16M ram and a 20'' megapel color monitor, but the RISC
processor is running around 12mhz on an ISA bus which is not very fast.
I am curious, though, about the releases of BSD for the old RT.
Few on the net know anything about them anymore, and docs are nil.
I asked around IBM, and sort of drew dumb quizzled looks, as if
it had vaporized long ago.
I have uncovered three discrete distributions, one labelled IBM,
and two non-labelled, but which were apparently out of IBM or related
to IBM in some way, maybe after IBM dropped AOS, but I am not sure.
The background of it all is a mystery.
The first is a ``build 0'' thing called AOS or AOS/4.3, and it
appears to be a somewhat vanilla 4.3BSD, or possibly might be
as late as Tahoe. It has pcc and a Metaware C compiler, and is not
very strange. Other than the compilers being somewhat broken and
the time never correct, it runs well, and feels like 4.3.
The second is a ``build 16'' and labelled Reno, but is running gcc
and related things. My suspicion is that it is a 4.4, but I am not
sure. It seems fairly plain and following the 4.4 docs pretty well.
I don't think it is really Reno, but was named that by someone back
in time for some developmental reason maybe having been started from
a Reno tree, although I am not sure.
The third is a ``build 433'' and labelled Lite, and seems to be somewhat
straight 4.4 and somethat Lite (has two intermixed source trees), and
is gigabyte in size, and rather strangely laid out. It may have been
the last build for the RT.
Unfortunately, original tapes and documents for these are long gone,
and I have only been able to pick up bits and pieces here and there.
I don't find mention of these ports anywhere in the usual docs, other
than a slight hint that they existed at one time. Supposedly, bits
are on a mystical CD that is reputed to exist, and I have heard of
two actual CD's that may have survived.
I have spent the last 6 months resurrecting the ports, and basically
have a reliable 4.3 running, a running but somewhat broken ``Reno''
or whatever it is (of all things vi is only 99% operational because
of terminal driver problems), and a broken but somewhat running
``4.4/4.4Lite'' or whatever that really is (it boots and barely
stays up, but I have been working on making it stay up).
Does anyone on the PUPS list remember what these things actually are,
and what level they are actually at? My historical curiosity is
getting the better of me, and like Michael, I tend to like the plain
model-T spartan simplicity of a 4.3 style machine. There really is
a large bloat between the 4.3 and 4.4 levels in my stuff, too. What
is responsible for the differences in the bloat? I get binaries about
half the size in 4.3 compared to the 4.4whatevers I have. Is that just
a function of gcc and how it codes things or libraries? Anyway, it
has been a most refreshing learning experience getting these things up
and running again.
Is there any interest on the list to archive the ports that I have?
Warren?
Out of curiosity, again, anyone else on the PUPS list running RT iron
or am I the last holdout? The few RT folks that I am familiar with
are all running AIX still, although they remember the BSDs. So much
seems to have been lost, already, or most of the machines have become
dumpster fodder.
Any insights, history, or horror stories about the old RT BSD ports are
most welcome.
Thanks
Bob Keys
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id EAA04175
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 04:35:28 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
Steven M. Schultz <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> writes:
> Reno came with GCC though.
Wrong. Reno uses pcc for both VAX and Tahoe architectures, just like
4.2, 4.3, 4.3-Tahoe, and all other True UNIX(R) releases. gcc is included
in the Reno distribution _as a compressed tarball_, and it's used only for
the experimental and unsupported hp300 port, and that's only because there
is no pcc support for it.
Sincerely,
Michael Sokolov
Phone: 440-449-0299 (Home) 216-217-2579 (Cellular)
ARPA Internet SMTP mail: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA01241
for pups-liszt; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 13:40:15 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> Mon Nov 23 12:26:14 1998
Received: from moe.2bsd.com (0(a)MOE.2BSD.COM [206.139.202.200])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA01235
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 13:40:05 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from sms(a)moe.2bsd.com)
Received: (from sms@localhost)
by moe.2bsd.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) id SAA20820
for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 18:26:14 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 18:26:14 -0800 (PST)
From: "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com>
Message-Id: <199811230226.SAA20820(a)moe.2bsd.com>
To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Subject: Re: 4.3-VAX distributions
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
Hi -
> From: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu (Michael Sokolov)
> Wrong. Reno uses pcc for both VAX and Tahoe architectures, just like
> 4.2, 4.3, 4.3-Tahoe, and all other True UNIX(R) releases. gcc is included
Oops - I actually fired up the uVax-II (first time in almost 3 years)
and typed 'gcc' and it told me 2.5.8
But as it turns out that was something I'd added later (with much work).
GCC2 on a 9mb machine isn't a pretty sight so pcc is actually a "good
thing" ;)
Steven
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA02007
for pups-liszt; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 18:05:00 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From Kirk McKusick <mckusick(a)mckusick.com> Mon Nov 23 16:05:13 1998
Received: from knecht.Sendmail.ORG (knecht.sendmail.org [209.31.233.160])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA02001
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 18:04:51 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from mckusick(a)flamingo.McKusick.COM)
Received: from flamingo.McKusick.COM (root(a)flamingo.mckusick.com [209.31.233.178])
by knecht.Sendmail.ORG (8.9.2.Alpha2/8.9.2.Alpha2) with ESMTP id XAA28300;
Sun, 22 Nov 1998 23:04:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from flamingo.McKusick.COM (mckusick@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by flamingo.McKusick.COM (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA03948;
Sun, 22 Nov 1998 22:05:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199811230605.WAA03948(a)flamingo.McKusick.COM>
To: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu (Michael Sokolov)
Subject: Re: What *was* the Tahoe?
cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 22 Nov 1998 20:14:04 EST."
<199811230114.UAA16563(a)skybridge.scl.cwru.edu>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 22:05:13 -0800
From: Kirk McKusick <mckusick(a)mckusick.com>
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 20:14:04 -0500
From: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu (Michael Sokolov)
To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Subject: Re: What *was* the Tahoe?
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Tim Shoppa <SHOPPA(a)trailing-edge.com> writes:
> I've been looking over the 4.3BSD Tahoe and Reno distributions
> available in the PUPS archive, and have (what I hope) is a rather
> simple question:
>
> What is the "Tahoe"?
I have been pondering over the same question for a LONG
time, and I would love to know the answer to it, as would
Rick Copeland. The ex-CSRG folks are probably the only
people on the planet who know the answer, and it looks like
Marshall Kirk McKusick is the only one of them on this list.
Kirk, do you have any insight?
Sincerely,
Michael Sokolov
Phone: 440-449-0299 (Home) 216-217-2579 (Cellular)
ARPA Internet SMTP mail: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu
Tahoe was the internal "code" name that Computer Consoles Inc used
for their Power 6/32 processor. Many of their early changes to BSD
were labelled:
#ifdef tahoe
to identify the 6/32 specific code. So, when we did the port we
just called it Tahoe because its prime purpose was to add support
for the CCI 6/32 machine.
Kirk McKusick
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA02069
for pups-liszt; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 18:19:19 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From Dave Horsfall <dave(a)fgh.geac.com.au> Mon Nov 23 17:16:50 1998
Received: from caveman.geac.com.au (caveman.geac.com.au [203.30.73.2])
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id SAA02064
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 18:19:11 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from dave(a)fgh.geac.com.au)
Received: (qmail 4403 invoked from network); 23 Nov 1998 06:22:48 -0000
Received: from brane.geac.com.au (202.6.67.115)
by caveman.geac.com.au with SMTP; 23 Nov 1998 06:22:48 -0000
Received: from fgh.geac.com.au by brane.geac.com.au with smtp\n (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0zhqEJ-00002RC; Mon, 23 Nov 98 18:16 AEDT
Received: from localhost (dave@localhost)
by fgh.geac.com.au (SMI-8.X/SVR4) with ESMTP id SAA05724
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 18:16:50 +1100
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 18:16:50 +1100 (EST)
From: Dave Horsfall <dave(a)fgh.geac.com.au>
X-Sender: dave@fgh
cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Subject: Re: What *was* the Tahoe?
In-Reply-To: <199811230605.WAA03948(a)flamingo.McKusick.COM>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.03.9811231813070.22354-100000@fgh>
X-No-Archive: Yes
X-Witty-Saying: "Tesseract - Enter at own risk"
X-Disclaimer: "Me, speak for us?"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
On Sun, 22 Nov 1998, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> Tahoe was the internal "code" name that Computer Consoles Inc used
> for their Power 6/32 processor. Many of their early changes to BSD
> were labelled:
> #ifdef tahoe
> to identify the 6/32 specific code. So, when we did the port we
> just called it Tahoe because its prime purpose was to add support
> for the CCI 6/32 machine.
And, as I recall (I used to work for STC Australia who sold 'em) it
had the instruction set of a Vax, but backwards, if you know what I
mean... The CPU was five boards, something like integer card plus
FPU card plus priority arbitrator card etc.
--
Dave Horsfall VK2KFU dave(a)geac.com.au Ph: +61 2 9978-7493 Fx: +61 2 9978-7422
Geac Computers P/L (FGH Division) 2/57 Christie St, St Leonards 2065, Australia
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id DAA03974
for pups-liszt; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 03:38:04 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
Tim Shoppa <SHOPPA(a)trailing-edge.com> writes:
> I've been looking over the 4.3BSD Tahoe and Reno distributions
> available in the PUPS archive, and have (what I hope) is a rather
> simple question:
>
> What is the "Tahoe"?
I have been pondering over the same question for a LONG time, and I
would love to know the answer to it, as would Rick Copeland. The ex-CSRG
folks are probably the only people on the planet who know the answer, and
it looks like Marshall Kirk McKusick is the only one of them on this list.
Kirk, do you have any insight?
Sincerely,
Michael Sokolov
Phone: 440-449-0299 (Home) 216-217-2579 (Cellular)
ARPA Internet SMTP mail: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA01021
for pups-liszt; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 12:01:58 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
