Hello from Gregg C Levine
I never had the chance to post this here, but one of my reasons for
joining our group, was that I was in the process of designing
something to plug into a PDP-11's bus, (or an LSI-11). I never
accomplished it, because I didn't have the parts here. Nor the
computer either to try out my design. I've now discovered that this
company, Luke International, http://www.lukechips.com/ which was
formed by a group of former AMD engineers, is selling the parts
someone would use to clone a PDP-11 processor.
And indeed the AM2908 matches those bus specs.
I also recall that the processor in question at one point in its
lifespan, actually used the AM2901 family of bit-slice processors. The
design is still going through the drawing board status, but now that
I've found a place that sells those parts means I am much closer.
Regarding those systems, if someone in the US, and preferably the NYC
area has a PDP-11/53, or an LSI-11, hanging around, please contact me.
-------------------
Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon(a)worldnet.att.net
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke."Â Obi-Wan Kenobi
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )
Groklaw has one of SCO's legal filings in the SCO/IBM case up that contains a
list of files that they claim contain infringing material:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20031111020447263
It seems to be basically "grep -r (SMP|IBM|NUMA|JFS) /usr/src/linux" with
little filtering of the output. The list contains filenames but not the
actual line numbers of the supposedly infringing code. So it is pretty
useless, but is more of a starting point than we've had to date.
I've got dibs on 48 hours in the "how long it takes for the community to find
prior public domain sources for all of the above" pool. :-)
Cheers,
Rhys.
Hi,
Do you remember the broken chip on pdp11/34 ?
well, i changed the HC74LS175P with an original SN74LS175N. Now
i can write and read correct data on memory :))) and the RED LED
"PARITY ERR" on the M7891 board turn OFF while pdp11 is running
a program. :)))
BUT
the pdp11 can't boot: the boot loader program stop after few
steps.
some details will follow in the next days; now i can't make any
further test ...
--
[asbesto : freaknet medialab : radio#cybernet : GPG key on keyservers]
[ MAIL ATTACH, SPAM, HTML, WORD, and msgs larger than 95K > /dev/null ]
[http://www.freaknet.org/asbesto IW9HGS http://kyuzz.org/radiocybernet]
> > I've personally thought that Sun should release the source trees of its old
> > BSD-based SunOS with the idea of getting back onside with all the Linux and
> > Unix people it pissed off by its "buying" a "Unix" license from SCO, the
> > Societe Commercial du On-Dit, the Commercial Society of Rumourmongers.
>
> Don't hold your breath. Even SunOS 4.1.x had large chunks of System V Release 3
> code in it: all the STREAMS stuff and RFS worked in that environment (not that
> anyone ever used it). Also all of /usr/5bin, /usr/5lib etc.
I removed all that stuff and booted up and ran on a complete free version of
SunOS long ago. Read about it here:
http://www.bitmover.com/lm/papers/srcos.html
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.comhttp://www.bitmover.com/lm
That program was canceled, see http://wwws.sun.com/software/solaris/source/
It was a license, and if you have it, you can not share it with non-licensees.
Also it wasn't quite complete.
> From: macbiesz(a)optonline.net
> A couple years ago, Sun released Solaris 8 source for free. The whole system is full of SVisms, and AFAIK, the source remains free.
>
> Maciek
> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 17:39:23 -0800 (PST)
> From: Kenneth Stailey <kstailey(a)yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [TUHS] 32V/I portability
> To: macbiesz(a)optonline.net, tuhs(a)minnie.tuhs.org
> Message-ID: <20031112013923.70852.qmail(a)web60509.mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> --- macbiesz(a)optonline.net wrote:
> > You could set up a Sourceforge project for 32/I?
> >
> > Maciek
>
> Anything but Sourceforge. You will rue the day you chose them. Don't take my
If someone gives me a pointer to the tarballs I'll happily import
them into BitKeeper and set up a 32vi.bkbits.net that anyone can use.
Unlike sourceforge, we're about quality, not quantity, but even so,
we have 1/3 as many files under revision control and no performance
problems. It's not really sourceforge's fault, they choose CVS and CVS
sucks. As Ted T'so said recently "CVS is not the answer, CVS is the
question. No is the answer." :)
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.comhttp://www.bitmover.com/lm
You could set up a Sourceforge project for 32/I?
Maciek
----- Original Message -----
From: Pat Villani <Pat.Villani(a)hp.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:41 pm
Subject: [TUHS] 32V/I portability
> Folks,
>
> After studying the source code for a while, I found a few explicit
> and
> implicit vaxisms that need to be rectified. I'd like to purge the
> source entirely of these vaxisms, but that would mean that if
> anyone
> wants to port what I do back to VAX, they'll need to do some work.
>
> Also, this mailing list is fairly low traffic, and for now my
> activities
> are very low traffic as well. Should I set up a separate mailing
> list
> for those interested in this project?
>
> Opinions?
>
> Pat
>
> --
> Outer space is no place for a person of breeding. -- Lady Violet
> Bonham
> Carter
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TUHS mailing list
> TUHS(a)minnie.tuhs.org
> http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs
>
Folks,
After studying the source code for a while, I found a few explicit and
implicit vaxisms that need to be rectified. I'd like to purge the
source entirely of these vaxisms, but that would mean that if anyone
wants to port what I do back to VAX, they'll need to do some work.
Also, this mailing list is fairly low traffic, and for now my activities
are very low traffic as well. Should I set up a separate mailing list
for those interested in this project?
Opinions?
Pat
--
Outer space is no place for a person of breeding. -- Lady Violet Bonham
Carter
> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:13:16 +1300
> From: Wesley Parish <wes.parish(a)paradise.net.nz>
> Subject: Re: Heritage X (was Re: [TUHS] Lauch Gui using remote xterm!!)
> To: tuhs(a)minnie.tuhs.org
>
> I've personally thought that Sun should release the source trees of its old
> BSD-based SunOS with the idea of getting back onside with all the Linux and
> Unix people it pissed off by its "buying" a "Unix" license from SCO, the
> Societe Commercial du On-Dit, the Commercial Society of Rumourmongers.
Don't hold your breath. Even SunOS 4.1.x had large chunks of System V Release 3
code in it: all the STREAMS stuff and RFS worked in that environment (not that
anyone ever used it). Also all of /usr/5bin, /usr/5lib etc.
Arnold