On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:05:33PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>
> A Pro350 was an F11, a Pro380 a T11 (I hope I remember this correctly)
> CPU. I think you could also run RT-11 on them. Some big VAX models
> had Pro's as console processors/systems. RD5x disk drives on the Pro's.
> And special I/O cards which only fit in Pros.
The Pro380 used the J11 chip. The T11 was a totally different chip, with only
the base instruction set (no multiply/divide/floating point) and 8 or 16 bit
bus
A couple years ago, Sun released Solaris 8 source for free. The whole system is full of SVisms, and AFAIK, the source remains free.
Maciek
----- Original Message -----
From: Aharon Robbins <arnold(a)skeeve.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:58 am
Subject: Re: Heritage X (was Re: [TUHS] Lauch Gui using remote xterm!!)
> > Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:13:16 +1300
> > From: Wesley Parish <wes.parish(a)paradise.net.nz>
> > Subject: Re: Heritage X (was Re: [TUHS] Lauch Gui using remote
> xterm!!)> To: tuhs(a)minnie.tuhs.org
> >
> > I've personally thought that Sun should release the source trees
> of its old
> > BSD-based SunOS with the idea of getting back onside with all the
> Linux and
> > Unix people it pissed off by its "buying" a "Unix" license from
> SCO, the
> > Societe Commercial du On-Dit, the Commercial Society of
> Rumourmongers.
> Don't hold your breath. Even SunOS 4.1.x had large chunks of System
> V Release 3
> code in it: all the STREAMS stuff and RFS worked in that
> environment (not that
> anyone ever used it). Also all of /usr/5bin, /usr/5lib etc.
>
> Arnold
> _______________________________________________
> TUHS mailing list
> TUHS(a)minnie.tuhs.org
> http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs
>
Greg Lehey wrote,
> > Others ported the system in those carefree days as well, in
> > particular Richard Miller at the University of Wollongong, but I
> > don't know much about the other efforts.
> I believe the Wollongong port predated the one at Bell Labs. Peter
> Gray tells me he still has the original machine they used, and he'd
> like to find a museum-like place to keep it. No idea whether it
> runs. Greg Rose should know a lot more about this matter. Greg, are
> you out there?
Having the original Wollongong Interdata 7/32 might
be interesting to the Computer History museum, though
it might be expensive to transport it across the Pacific.
As for dates: the Wollongong port was essentially
contemporaneous with ours, certainly independent,
and was declared in production sooner (July 1977
vs. spring 1978). Ours was "in principle" done by Aug.
1977, theirs by April '77. Various papers are
gathered at
http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/portpapers.html
Greg Rose is definitely still extant.
Dennis
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Here's a comment from my side of the pond. Al Kossow has a great
collection of PDF files on the PDP-11. Right now I'm grabbing the ones
that discuss my current collection of problems. The location is
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/
>From that one, and behind it, sits his entire collection. But that
space is entirely the PDP-11.
-------------------
Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon(a)worldnet.att.net
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke."Â Obi-Wan Kenobi
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )
Hi.
I backported an RL driver to v6 and salvaged files from
"v6_rl02_unknown" using it (on SIMH). See
http://www.tom-yam.or.jp/2238/rl/
Enjoy!
Naoki Hamada
nao(a)tom-yam.or.jp
Hi
All
I am trying to lauch a xterm window on a remote machine and then once the
xterm window is launched from the remote machine I am trying to start a gui
on the xterm window.
The following is the command I am using to start the xterm .It is failing
and giving the error.
remsh hostname " . /home/john/.profile >/dev/null 2> /dev/null;xterm"
stty: invalid command
xterm Xt error: Can't open display
also can you let me know once the xterm is open how do we lauch the gui on
the xterm window using the same remoteshell.The gui name is nam_gui.
Regards,
Naveen
Ow, c'mon. In *australia*, how hard can it be to find or make
space for that priceless collection? Geez!
Given the nearly-complete collection of DEC systems, HP-Oz should
be deeply ashamed if they don't pitch in, along with other vendors
and local support techs.
We can't expect all companies to maintain a collection that reflects
their history (for tech-practical reasons alone), but we *should* be
able to expect them to help others who do it "for" them...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Toby Thain [mailto:tobyhome@telegraphics.com.au]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:08 PM
> To: Dave Horsfall
> Cc: pups(a)minnie.tuhs.org
> Subject: Re: [pups] Re: History of 32-bit UNIX (was History of 2 BSD)
>
>
>
> On 11/11/2003, at 3:01 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
> >
> >>> I believe the Wollongong port predated the one at Bell
> Labs. Peter
> >>> Gray tells me he still has the original machine they
> used, and he'd
> >>> like to find a museum-like place to keep it. No idea whether it
> >>> runs. Greg Rose should know a lot more about this
> matter. Greg, are
> >>> you out there?
> >>
> >> Having the original Wollongong Interdata 7/32 might
> >> be interesting to the Computer History museum, though
> >> it might be expensive to transport it across the Pacific.
> >
> > Perhaps this would be a better home for it:
> >
> > http://www.terrigal.net.au/~acms/museum.htm
>
> It would not be a safe home until they have solved their eviction
> problem (now due for mid-Dec 2003):
> http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/05/19/1053196515142.html
> and http://www.terrigal.net.au/~acms/
>
> Given the significance of the machine in question, IMHO it would be
> safer in care of private individuals until an Australian computer
> museum is funded -
> http://www.terrigal.net.au/~acms/
> ACMS%20Prospectus%20rec%20on%2005Feb2003.htm
>
> Toby
>
> _______________________________________________
> PUPS mailing list
> PUPS(a)minnie.tuhs.org
> http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/pups
>
Gregg C Levine wrote :-
> I also recall that the processor in question at one point in its
> lifespan, actually used the AM2901 family of bit-slice processors.
DEC didn't use 2901's in central processors, but the FPU's for 11/34 and
11/44 used 16 of them to make the 64 bit data path for the FPU. They were
also used in some peripherals like the KMC-11.
A lot of OEM's (like Emulex) used them in disk/tape/terminal controllers.
Quote from http://www.deadmedia.org/notes/3/034.html:
"A copy of his first programme-controlled electro-mechanical digital computer, the Z3, was made in 1960 and put on display at the Deutsches Museum in Munich. A copy of the Z1 was constructed in 1989, and can be found in the Museum for Transport and Technology in Berlin."
Maciek
----- Original Message -----
From: Jochen Kunz <jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de>
Date: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:43 am
Subject: Re: [pups] ACMS (Australian 'puter museum) doomed?
> On 2003.11.13 00:06 Johnny Billquist wrote:
>
> > Not to demean that effort, but don't the Germans have a Z4 still
> > working in a museum? That would mean something like 1942.
> 1942 would be the Z3, the first computer ever. The Z3 that is in the
> Deutsches Museum is AFAIK a rebuild of the original one. (Rebuild
> underthe supervision of Konrad Zuse himself.) I don't know if the
> Z4 is still
> around. Google for "Konrad Zuse" and / or his son "Horst Zuse". Horst
> Zuse has put much effort in documenting the work of his father.
>
> I know that there is a Zuse Z23 in Karlsruhe. It was build in 1956,
> based on electron tubes, core and drum memory and it is still fully
> functional!
> --
>
>
> tschüß,
> Jochen
>
> Homepage: http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/
>
> _______________________________________________
> PUPS mailing list
> PUPS(a)minnie.tuhs.org
> http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/pups
>
> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:30:34 +1100 (EST)
> From: John Holden <johnh(a)psych.usyd.edu.au>
> To: pups(a)minnie.tuhs.org
> Subject: [pups]
> Re: A project--buiilding a device to plug into a PDP-11's bus
>
> Gregg C Levine wrote :-
>
> > I also recall that the processor in question at one point in its
> > lifespan, actually used the AM2901 family of bit-slice processors.
>
> DEC didn't use 2901's in central processors, but the FPU's for 11/34 and
> 11/44 used 16 of them to make the 64 bit data path for the FPU. They were
> also used in some peripherals like the KMC-11.
At one time there was a set of application notes that described how
to build a PDP11 clone out of AM2901 bit slices. I think that the
performance would have been approximately that of an 11/40, while
the time and effort and parts cost would have been prohibitive for
a one-off production.
It is barely possible that I have a set of those notes somewhere,
although it would take a very lucky random search to find them.
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
clowenst(a)ucsd.edu