Hi.
I am trying to bring up a Sprite cluster. [1]
I was able to get the demo system running on a SPARCstation 1+ by dd-ing
the boot image to a disk. Now I wane label an additional disk, make LFS,
... make the new disk bootable to get more free disk space then I have
on the premade boot image. But I can't get a label on the disk with
labeldisk nor did I succeed using fsmakeprompt. The later crashes...
Next step is to bring a SPARCstation 2, an IPX and two ELCs into the
cluster.
Is there someone out there with Sprite experience who can help me?
Additionaly I was not able to get the PMAX image to work on my
DECstation 5000/240 nor my DECstation 3100. Any ideas? Do I really need
a DECstation 5000/200 for this?
[1] http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/Research/Projects/sprite/
A mixed architecture, distributed single system image OS capable of
process migration that presented the cluster to a user as a single,
large multiprocessor machine. Pmake and LFS (Log-Structured File System)
originate from Sprite.
--
tschüß,
Jochen
Homepage: http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/
> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:50:26 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Thorsten Glaser <tg(a)66h.42h.de>
> Subject: Re: [TUHS] licence of ditroff?
> To: Aharon Robbins <arnold(a)skeeve.com>
> Cc: martinwguy(a)yahoo.it, miros-discuss(a)66h.42h.de, tuhs(a)minnie.tuhs.org
>
> Aharon Robbins dixit:
>
> >Instead of starting with 27 year old code, you'd be better
> >off taking the troff from http://www.swtch.com/plan9port.
>
> Thanks, that's a nice idea, but from what I experienced,
> the portability of recent AT&T/Bell/Lucent/whatever code
> is worse than the bugs in old code (eg. I could not get
> ksh93 to compile, something in there just dumped core;
> but then that's Unix, not Plan 9).
ksh93 is a different animal, from a different group, and problems
there are not surprising (sadly).
On the flip side, they do take bug reports seriously.
> >This is a port of many Plan 9 utilities to Unix. The troff there
> >(a) has an explicit license that will probably do for the BSD people
>
> If it's the same licence as for 8c, then no, unfortunately.
I don't know. It's worth double checking the current license; it
changed sometime in the past year or two.
The Plan 9 troff is certainly a descendant of the ditroff you
found, for whatever that's worth.
Arnold
Instead of starting with 27 year old code, you'd be better
off taking the troff from http://www.swtch.com/plan9port.
This is a port of many Plan 9 utilities to Unix. The troff there
(a) has an explicit license that will probably do for the BSD people
(b) already knows how to produce PostScript
(c) can handle UTF-8 and 16-bit Unicode
Arnold
> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:39:47 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Thorsten Glaser <tg(a)66h.42h.de>
> Subject: [TUHS] licence of ditroff?
> To: martinwguy(a)yahoo.it
> Cc: tuhs(a)minnie.tuhs.org, miros-discuss(a)66h.42h.de
>
> Hi!
>
> I would like to know which licence the files at
> http://medialab.dyndns.org/~martin/tape/stuff/ditroff/
> are under.
>
> If it's http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Caldera-license.pdf
> that would be nice, if not, is there any way to find
> out whose (c) is on the files, and how to contact them?
>
> Reason: I'm developer of a BSD offspring and already
> integrated 4.4BSD-Alpha nroff, neqn, tbl etc. under the
> Caldera licence above into our operating system in order
> to get rid of the less free, written in C++, GNU groff.
> With success. Now I'm lacking postscript output.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> //mirabile
> _______________________________________________
> TUHS mailing list
> TUHS(a)minnie.tuhs.org
> http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs
----- Forwarded message from Martin Guy <martin(a)freaknet.org> -----
From: Martin Guy <martin(a)freaknet.org>
To: asbesto <asbesto(a)freaknet.org>
Subject: Re: [tg(a)66h.42h.de: [TUHS] licence of ditroff?]
Ta!
I already dealt with this in november - same person.
Is this an old message?
The outcome was: it's in the public domain because they
published the original sources with no copyright notice at the
top... so they are going to create a new free troff from the
sources on my tape, more free than groff!
Yes!
M
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, asbesto wrote:
[snip]
> ----- Forwarded message from Thorsten Glaser <tg(a)66h.42h.de> -----
>
> I would like to know which licence the files at
> http://medialab.dyndns.org/~martin/tape/stuff/ditroff/
> are under.
[snip]
> ----- End forwarded message -----
--
[ asbesto ::: IW9HGS ::: freaknet medialab ::: radio#cybernet ]
[ http://freaknet.org/asbestohttp://papuasia.org/radiocybernet ]
[ I DELETE MSGS > 100K & with ATTACHMENTS, HTML, M$-WORD, SPAM ]
[ NON USARE LETTERE ACCENTATE ==== NON MANDARE MESSAGGI IN HTML ]
Is the original code for SCCS under the Caldera license? In particular,
is there a URL where it's available? Or should someone wishing to work
with SCCS files use GNU CSSC?
Thanks,
Arnold
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Question: Will the list server drop subscribers, if they have not
posted anything to the list? Or are other reasons taken into
circumstances?
Consider this, for any number of reasons, two of my e-mail addresses
for this ISP are subscribed to this list, some time ago a posting
arrived at Address #2, but Address #1 didn't receive it.
Repeated queries to the list server's management site, didn't provide
me with my password, nor did entering what I thought it was when I
first subscribed to it, succeed. However my first clew that something
was up, happened when it accepted my requests to rejoin it.
So when you have the time to look into the matter, can you
investigate. FYI, the address in doubt is this one.
-------------------
Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon(a)worldnet.att.net
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke."Â Obi-Wan Kenobi
