Hey gang,
Does anyone have an online manual or other info for the DQ686
ESDI disk controller from Dilog? I'm trying to fix a VAX 4,
which as that beastie...
Thanks,
Fred
> From: "Fred N. van Kempen" <Fred.van.Kempen(a)microwalt.nl>
> To: <pups(a)minnie.tuhs.org>
> Subject: [pups] Dilog DQ686, anyone?
>
> Hey gang,
>
> Does anyone have an online manual or other info for the DQ686
> ESDI disk controller from Dilog? I'm trying to fix a VAX 4,
> which as that beastie...
There is a manual for the DQ696, which is essentially the same thing
except it controls 2 drives not 4. It was last seen by me at
< http://www.miim.com/documents/dilog/dq696.zip >.
It is zip-compressed MSWord.
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
clowenst(a)ucsd.edu
we all know that UNIX first ran on the PDP-7 and then on the PDP-11/20,
but does anyone know anything about PDP-9 UNIX? it\'s mentioned in \"The
UNIX Time-Sharing System\" in the V7 manual:
\"The earliest [version of UNIX] (circa 1969-70) ran on the Digital
Equipment Corporation PDP-7 and -9 computers.\"
--
If I travelled to the end of the rainbow
As Dame Fortune did intend
Murphy would be there to tell me
The pot is at the other end
Lars
Hi all
Firstly, I have done this before, but due to age/stress/tiredness/whatever,
I can't remember what I did!
I am using Warren's/Fred's vtserver program to install BSD2.11 on an 11/53.
I have installed the root.dump file (and all the steps beforehand) and now
my '53 boots into 2.11. So far so good!
I now need to restore the usr file systems - all the stuff in file6/7/8.tar
How do I do this still using Vtserver.
Someone remind me please!
Regards
Kevin Murrell
You could also run Unix v6, if you're of a historical bent; 2.9BSD
should run with no problems; and possibly v7, if you have the 22-bit
address bus and enough RAM. Keep in mind that if there isn't a
distribution for your machine, you can build one on an emulator, then
create a disk image. However, with v6 I ran the 11/40 image on an 11/34
and was able to rebuild for my hardware.
Warren wrote a neat tool to get bits onto a machine over a serial line;
it takes a while (at 9600 baud!), but it works. Look on the PUPS site
under VTserver; don't worry that there probably isn't an installation
package for a given version or machine, there's a way to run a small
client on a PC that can talk to a bootstrap on the target machine. --
Ian
DISCLAIMER: Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain - or to my
email address. These rantings are my personal statements, and not a
product of my employer.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Gunshannon [mailto:bill@cs.scranton.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 11:17 AM
To: Unix_Preservation_List
Subject: Re: [pups] Unix on a PDP-11/24
On 13 Aug 2002, Christopher McNabb wrote:
> I've acquired a PDP-11/24 with 2 RL02s and a RA80. What are my
> options for running Unix?
>
Ultrix-11 if you can get a 9-track tape drive. :-)
bill
--
Bill Gunshannon | de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n. Three
wolves
bill(a)cs.scranton.edu | and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton |
Scranton, Pennsylvania | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
_______________________________________________
PUPS mailing list
PUPS(a)minnie.tuhs.org http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/pups
> I've acquired a PDP-11/24 with 2 RL02s and a RA80. What are
> my options for running Unix?
Either a small system like V7, or Ultrix-11.
And no, you don't need a tape drive... as long as you have a PC
around, and the PDP-11 has a serial port, you can use my VTserver
package to install Ultrix over the console port.
Cheers,
Fred
I've acquired a PDP-11/24 with 2 RL02s and a RA80. What are my options
for running Unix?
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher L McNabb Tel: 540 231 7554
Operating Systems Analyst Email: cmcnabb(a)vt.edu
Virginia Tech ICBM: 37.205622N 80.414595W
GMRS: WPSR255 ARS: N2UX Grid Sq: EM97SD
On 08/10/2002 04:54:16 PM MST Al Kossow wrote:
>
>> I see there no version for the Z8000 but for the 16032. Was there
>> really a Z8000 version?
>
>http://www.lcs.mit.edu/about/architects.html
>
>"Fortunately for Ward, by 1980 the community of computer researchers
>had grown from a few labs to a few dozen---and for the most part, the
>research community was moving in one particular direction: UNIX, the
>castrated Multics operating system that had been spawned from Bell
>Labs. UNIX was loved because it was small and portable, which meant
>that it would be easy for Ward to get the operating system running on
>the NuMachine. The group got the UNIX source code from Bell Labs and
>ported the operating system to three different microprocessors: the
>Zilog Z8000, the Intel 8086, and the Motorola 68000. Although it
>would not be clear for several years, by building a single-user
>computer with a bitmapped display, a network interface, and a
>powerful microprocessor, Ward's group had just created one of the
>world's first UNIX workstations.
>"
Hmm, but where is it? :-)
regards,
chris
> I see there no version for the Z8000 but for the 16032. Was there
> really a Z8000 version?
http://www.lcs.mit.edu/about/architects.html
"Fortunately for Ward, by 1980 the community of computer researchers had grown from a few labs to a few dozen---and for the most part, the research community was moving in one particular direction: UNIX, the castrated Multics operating system that had been spawned from Bell Labs. UNIX was loved because it was small and portable, which meant that it would be easy for Ward to get the operating system running on the NuMachine. The group got the UNIX source code from Bell Labs and ported the operating system to three different microprocessors: the Zilog Z8000, the Intel 8086, and the Motorola 68000. Although it would not be clear for several years, by building a single-user computer with a bitmapped display, a network interface, and a powerful microprocessor, Ward's group had just created one of the world's first UNIX workstations.
"
On 08/10/2002 10:09:54 AM ZE10 Warren Toomey wrote:
>
>In article by M E Leypold @ labnet:
>> Al Kossow writes:
>> > There were ports of PCC to the 8086, Z8000, and 68000 done by
>> > MIT's Laboratory for Computer Science. This might be a more
>> > historically correct place to start.
>> I alway wondered, wether the source of these ports is available
>> somewhere. I bet it isn't.
>> Regards -- Markus
>
>Al has sent in the PCC ports mentioned to the Unix Archive. They are
>now available on the primary site at both:
>
> http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Applications/Portable_CC/
> ftp://minnie.tuhs.org/UnixArchive/Applications/Portable_CC/
I see there no version for the Z8000 but for the 16032. Was there
really a Z8000 version?
regards,
chris
