Hello from Gregg C Levine
This is both my first post from this address, and a couple of questions.
Question 1) Has anyone actually followed the instructions and
description of same, found inside the readme file found in the
directory?
Question 2) Was this on actual hardware? Or inside the Simh simulator?
Or even with one version of E11?
In my case this will be inside the Simh simulator, and I am basically
working straight from the beginning. If all goes well, I'll move it to
the E11 one.
-------------------
Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon(a)worldnet.att.net
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke."Â Obi-Wan Kenobi
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )
Jeffrey Sharp <jss(a)subatomix.com> wrote:
> Yes, I believe I am somewhat younger than most the very respectable members
> of this group. :-)
I'm about the same. My timeline:
1979 born
1988 first computer: Soviet PDP-11 clone, first language: PDP-11 assembly
1995 first introduced to UNIX
1996 first live encounter with a VAX
1998 started maintaining my own version of VAX UNIX
2000 fully converted to it
2002 thinking about designing and building a new VAX CPU on an FPGA
MS
Hello from Gregg C Levine
I found out, on my system, and borrowing the Cygwin tools for file
manipulation, the actual file name for .2,9BSD_rl02_1145.gz, it is
rl02_2.9BSDroot, so I used that name in place of the one suggested inside
the readme file. It works the same way. However, this is just the root
collection. Is there any other pack available that contains the other
members of the entire 2.9BSD system that provided us with this one? Also
this was done with version 2.9-11 of Simh. So, when you get a chance,
Warren, you can update the readme, and upload the appropriate file to the
directory on your server. Oh yes, this came from a mirror of your site, its
the one on ftp.tux.org
Gregg C Levine drwho8(a)worldnet.att.net
"Oh my!" The Second Doctor's nearly favorite phrase.
Hello from Gregg C Levine
This is something that is totally different then what I first reported on
regarding this distribution. In the readme for this one, it mentions
everything list inside the directory, except the one marked down as
"Unlabeled", and it originally came on a RL02 type diskpack. It is not
listed in the Readme. Obviously it is what it says it is, an unlabled
diskpack that Tim recovered the same day as the others, and those are indeed
present, and listed. Except obviously the one that I first reported, that
one isn't mentioned, and not there. That subject is done. I am just
reporting on "Unlabeled", as far as everyone is concerned, is there anything
on it? Or is it an empty pack?
Gregg C Levine drwho8(a)worldnet.att.net
"Oh my!" The Second Doctor's nearly favorite phrase.
Another reason the 5620 was botched so badly was that AT&T wanted >=
$2000 for the development kit (read: C compiler and libraries) for it.
Not a good way to get lots of 3rd party application developers
on your bandwagon.
I used one for a year or so; it was the first windowing system I'd
used and the only one I've really liked. For about 10 years I've been
using 9wm, which gives a similar feel (at least to me). Those who want
to go all the way should adopt 9term as well. (I generally run xterm +
bash these days, although for a long while it was 9term + es/rc.)
Somewhere, I have an X version of the 5620 font. I found that it
wasn't so pretty. I've been using the pelm-latin1-9 font from the sam
distribution for years.
Norman forgot to mention that the most long-lived split-design application
is Rob Pike's sam editor, still available for X11 and still in use on
Plan 9.
Arnold
Another hurdle for the 5620/630/730 lines of terminals was when I
tried getting software support. Teletype being a mostly a "dumb"
terminal manufacturer never considered them more that a way to have
multilple 80 char x 24 line terminals on one display. I had difficulty
in conveying to them that it was a computer in its own right and you
could program it. The marketing was probably just as limited in scope.
Another blow for the BLIT portion on the terminal came when you
cound get an external cartridge for the 730 that turned it
into an X-terminal. I got mine in 1991 and then rarely used
layers after that.
-B
Norman Wilson's account of the Jerq/Blit etc. is quite
complete and correct, though there was some recycling
of names. 'Jerq' actually was used quite early, when
Pike got interested in bitmap graphics. The name
was a takeoff on the Three Rivers Perq, which he (and I)
saw at Lucasfilm Ltd. while attending an early Usenix.
Blit was the slightly more PC version (suggested either
as part of BitBlt or "Bell Labs Interactive Terminal).
The originals used the Motorola 68000, and part of
the development messup was AT&T Computer systems'
decision to switch to the WE32000 processor with
consequent delay for porting and reworking.
The earliest versions were not quite as wonderful
in practice as Norman suggests for the later ones.
They were built by the Teletype corp. model shop
(in quantity of a few hundred) and downloading
the OS took several minutes at 1200bps--necessary
at startup, since they didn't have a ROM for the whole
thing, just enough for doing a download. They
were also static electricity antennas! Many
is the time that I would shift in my chair, then
touch the keyboard, only to have the terminal
reset itself. I developed the habit of putting my
hand on the heavy steel case before moving around.
On the other hand, the basic idea was architecturally
right (and the later commercial versions were not so
subject to static, and had ROM for the OS). They
were even nicer at 9600bps.
It's good to know that Norman is still using his.
Dennis
> I've been using this window system more or less daily since August 1984,
> though only at home since I left Bell Labs in 1990. (I am using it to
> type this message.)
!
what other hardware and software do you run, if you don't mind my noseyness?
> From: "A.P.Garcia" <apgarcia(a)uwm.edu>
> To: tuhs(a)minnie.tuhs.org
> Subject: [TUHS] c coding standards
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 01:52:08 +0000
>
> check out this old post I found on Google Groups.
> this kind of stuff makes me giddy. :-)
< 2288 lines deleted >
Not to be overly picky, but aren't there two copies of everything.
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
clowenst(a)ucsd.edu