TUHS

tuhs@tuhs.org

61 participants
6532 discussions

Re: [pups] Tektronix 8560 with PDP-11/23 CPU running TNIX (UINX)

by David W. Talmage

>I got a "Tektronix 8560 Multi-User Software Development Unit" together >with a Tektronix 8540 in system 68k CPU emulator. The 8560 is based on I found this by Googling for "tnix single-user": http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/pups/1998-March/000027.html

22 years, 1 month

[pups] Tektronix 8560 with PDP-11/23 CPU running TNIX (UINX)

by Jochen Kunz

Hi. I got a "Tektronix 8560 Multi-User Software Development Unit" together with a Tektronix 8540 in system 68k CPU emulator. The 8560 is based on the DEC M8186 PDP-11/23 CPU module but that card is the one and only DEC part in the machine. Everything else is from Tektronix. There is a 35 MB 8" disk and a 8" floppy in the 8560 and it runs some flavor of UNIX called TNIX. I am trying to break into it currently, as I have no passwords. I can't get it to single user mode and I have no distribution media nor no stand alone tools. Has someone heared from this machine bevore? Has someone distribution media or stand alone tools? -- tschüß, Jochen Homepage: http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/

22 years, 1 month

RE: [pups] Restoring volumes

by Gregg C Levine

Hello again from Gregg C Levine Yes, Ian. That's exactly what I mean. Of course I was thinking of RL02 images, rather then a RK05 image. Which one did you choose? And can you post something explaining the steps? And your response was the simpler form, which is what I wanted. David's comment was a bit obtuse, but I got it. By the way? Are you a WB fan? As in Warner Bros. Animation. I'm partial to the wisdom of B. Bunny. ------------------- Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon(a)worldnet.att.net ------------------------------------------------------------ "The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi "Use the Force, Luke." Obi-Wan Kenobi (This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi ) (This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda ) Sign on the side of a transport belonging to the Rebel Alliance, "Force happens". > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian King [mailto:iking@killthewabbit.org] > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 1:34 AM > To: Gregg C Levine > Subject: Re: [pups] Restoring volumes > > That's where I got my RK05 image for UNIX v6, which I run on my 11/34. Is > that what you're asking, or am I being simple? -- Ian > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gregg C Levine" <hansolofalcon(a)worldnet.att.net> > To: <pups(a)minnie.tuhs.org> > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 8:35 PM > Subject: [pups] Restoring volumes > > > Hello again from Gregg C Levine > Just for the sake of an argument, has anyone actually managed to > restore a volume from the collection on the ftp server, back to an > originally sized disk pack? Or for that matter restored a system so > that it behaves as advertised under E-11? > > No, folks that machine I "have on order", has not arrived. Once again > I am searching for information for a future project. One that might be > happening sometime this week, or even later this month. > ------------------- > Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon(a)worldnet.att.net > ------------------------------------------------------------ > "The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi > "Use the Force, Luke." Obi-Wan Kenobi > (This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi ) > (This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )

22 years, 1 month

Re: Re: [pups] 2.11BSD device config trouble

by msokolov＠ivan.Harhan.ORG

Norman Wilson <norman(a)nose.cs.utoronto.ca> wrote: > This convenience was abolished in either 4.2 or 4.3 (I am > travelling right now and cannot check manuals and > sources). I don't remember the details in my head and I'm also typing this on the go, but in 4.3BSD fsck does work on the block device and then you reboot with, well, reboot, and it works. MS

22 years, 2 months

Re: Re: [pups] 2.11BSD device config trouble

by Norman Wilson

Carl Lowenstein: Isn't this really true of Unix systems of any age, when doing fsck on a mounted root file system? Some middle-elderly BSD systems--4.1 and possibly 4.0-- managed the buffer pool in such a way that the super-block of a mounted file system was kept in the original buffer, with device and block number correctly stored in the struct buf header. Hence if fsck wrote to the block device rather than the raw one, the super-block came out right even when checking a mounted file system; in particular there was no need to reboot. This convenience was abolished in either 4.2 or 4.3 (I am travelling right now and cannot check manuals and sources). I never quite understood why, though I never looked at the source code in the later systems. The scheme found in most current systems, in which the root starts out read-only, is a better idea anyway. Norman Wilson Toronto ON (normally)

22 years, 2 months

[pups] Restoring volumes

by Gregg C Levine

Hello again from Gregg C Levine Just for the sake of an argument, has anyone actually managed to restore a volume from the collection on the ftp server, back to an originally sized disk pack? Or for that matter restored a system so that it behaves as advertised under E-11? No, folks that machine I "have on order", has not arrived. Once again I am searching for information for a future project. One that might be happening sometime this week, or even later this month. ------------------- Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon(a)worldnet.att.net ------------------------------------------------------------ "The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi "Use the Force, Luke." Obi-Wan Kenobi (This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi ) (This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda ) Sign on the side of a transport belonging to the Rebel Alliance, "Force happens".

22 years, 2 months

Re: [pups] 2.11BSD device config trouble

by Steven M. Schultz

Hi - > From: Jochen Kunz <jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de> > As already mentioned: If I add comments at the end of the lines it > cn 1 176540 344 5 cnrint cnxint # kl/dl-11 (on mvx11-aa) > cn 2 176550 354 5 cnrint cnxint # kl/dl-11 (on mvx11-aa) > cn 3 176560 364 5 cnrint cnxint # kl/dl-11 (on mvx11-aa) > cn 1 csr 176540 vector 344 attached > cn 2 csr 176550 vector 354 attached > cn 3 csr 176560 vector 364 attached > Sounds like a funny bug? Yes, it does. A bug in the parsing. Why it does not affect all the lines is unknown. Perhaps some trailing whitespace caused the parser to exhibit the bug. > But if I try to use /dev/ttyl1 I get a message about a unknown interrupt > and the output of /dev/ttyl1 hangs after the first character. What is the exact message? I did a "strings /unix" and could not not find a string that looked mentioned unknown or interrupt. That would seem to indicate that the device is interrupting but not at the expected vector. It is possible to use 'adb' to look at the contents of the vectors. adb -k /unix /dev/kmem 0344/o will show the contents of the 0344 vector. The value there should be equal to 'cnrint' (or cnxint - I forget which comes first). > I have a M3106 DZQ11 that I can use instead. Definitely worth trying. > The DHV is a DEC M3104: > dhv ? csr 160440 vector 310 didn't interrupt. > The DL11 card is a clone made by Sigma. Ah, ok. Thanks for the correction. I misread the initial mail item. > > 'halt' button? > [...] > Noticed that already. I am really not used to Unix stuff of that age. :) I did the the same thing - wondered why I could never get a clean file system. Then I realized what was going on. Cheers, Steven Schultz

22 years, 2 months

Re: [pups] 2.11BSD device config trouble

by Steven M. Schultz

Hi - > From: Carl Lowenstein <cdl(a)mpl.ucsd.edu> > > > > 'halt' button? > > > [...] > > > > I did the the same thing - wondered why I could never get a clean > > file system. Then I realized what was going on. > > Isn't this really true of Unix systems of any age, when doing fsck > on a mounted root file system? Not really. Newer systems mount the root filesystem read-only while running fsck. After the filesystem is verified as clean then it is upgraded to read-write. Older systems such as 2BSD can't run with a read-only root filesystem that I know of. At least not easily/happily. Might be possible (the ability to upgrade a ro mount to rw is present) but it's never been a priority to look into it ;) Cheers, Steven Schultz

22 years, 2 months

Re: [pups] 2.11BSD device config trouble

by Carl Lowenstein

> From: "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)2BSD.COM> > To: pups(a)minnie.tuhs.org > Subject: Re: [pups] 2.11BSD device config trouble > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:43:11 -0700 (PDT) > > Hi - > > > From: Jochen Kunz <jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de> > > > > 'halt' button? > > [...] > > Noticed that already. I am really not used to Unix stuff of that age. > > :) > > I did the the same thing - wondered why I could never get a clean > file system. Then I realized what was going on. Isn't this really true of Unix systems of any age, when doing fsck on a mounted root file system? carl

22 years, 2 months

[pups] About Per Brinch Hansen

by Wesley Parish

Anyone thought of asking him if he could contribute his Concurrent Pascal and Solo, etc, to PUPS? Just a thought. Welsey Parish -- Mau e ki, "He aha te mea nui?" You ask, "What is the most important thing?" Maku e ki, "He tangata, he tangata, he tangata." I reply, "It is people, it is people, it is people."

22 years, 2 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

TUHS