Does anyon know if any of the Unix versions for the Integrated Soulutions
68K CPU (the one that went in QBUS boxes) is still in existence and
available anywhere? Also, there wre alternate PROMS that did MACSBUG
is there any chance someone here knows if that is available any where?
bill
--
Bill Gunshannon | de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n. Three wolves
bill(a)cs.scranton.edu | and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton |
Scranton, Pennsylvania | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
My recollection from those days was that Banyan Vines was developed in
collaboration with DEC. I think it would have been more likely that it was
BSD or (eek) ULTRIX based. I was working on system and network management
at AT&T USO/USL/Novell/HP until 1997 and never heard it mentioned that
Banyan Vines was on any sort of System V license though we were all quite
aware of the product. I think I would have heard something if they were
³one of ours.² Given the timeframe it would more likely have been some sort
of 7th edition license, but in those days BSD would have been the more
logical choice. This is just my recollection, however. I¹ll see what I can
track down in terms of facts.
Very truly yours,
- janet
Janet Frazer Sala
>
> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:56:26 -0700
> From: Andrew Warkentin <andreww(a)datanet.ab.ca>
> Subject: Re: [TUHS] Banyan Vines? Banyan/ePresence dissolves self
> To: tuhs(a)minnie.tuhs.org
> Message-ID: <47A18D3A.5090401(a)datanet.ab.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Wesley Parish wrote:
>
>> >Who would one need to get in touch with, to ask about the possibility of
>> >getting the various obsolete Banyan Vines bits and pieces donated to TUHS?
>> >(It was based on a Unix kernel, so I would say it - one of the first NOSes
>> to
>> >have a directory - should be part of the TUHS repository.)
>> >
>> >
> Wasn't it based on System V? Wouldn't that prevent it from being
> released? (unless they made a similar deal with AT&T to the one Sun
> made, which is very unlikely)
I was reading Graklaw for more-of-the-same - boneheaded companies taking on
productive people with intent to reduce dangerous productivity in favour of
monopolizing transaction tokens ie, money - and I came across the article on
some_bright_spark suing some other company for daring to try protecting
networks from email-borne spam:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080125135544713
Which got me thinking - Banyan Vines was a player back then, and the comments
mentioned only Novell. Surely there's something about Banyan's Vines?
I did a google search and found this:
http://www.bizjournals.com/masshightech/stories/2007/12/24/daily7.html?ana=…
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Liquidating ePresence distributes cash
Mass High Tech: The Journal of New England Technology
<snip>
Framingham's ePresence Inc. reports a plan to distribute cash to its
shareholders as part of its dissolution plan.
The distribution of $3.6 million, or 14 cents per common share, is expected
to be paid this week to those who were ePresence shareholders as of June 23,
2004. The distribution, combined with the previous distributions totaling
$4.15 per share, would return a total $4.29 per share to ePresence
shareholders, company officials said.
EPresence was launched in 1983 as Banyan Systems, selling a network operating
system and directory. But competitors such as Novell Inc. and Microsoft Corp.
subsequently moved into that market and Banyan switched focus in 1997.
In 2003, ePresence sold it services business to Unisys Corp. for $11.5
million. In 2004, the company sold its online telephone directory division
Switchboard Inc. to Bellevue, Wash.-based InfoSpace Inc. for $160 million.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who would one need to get in touch with, to ask about the possibility of
getting the various obsolete Banyan Vines bits and pieces donated to TUHS?
(It was based on a Unix kernel, so I would say it - one of the first NOSes to
have a directory - should be part of the TUHS repository.)
Thanks
Wesley Parish
--
Clinersterton beademung, with all of love - RIP James Blish
-----
Gaul is quartered into three halves. Things which are
impossible are equal to each other. Guerrilla
warfare means up to their monkey tricks.
Extracts from "Schoolboy Howlers" - the collective wisdom
of the foolish.
-----
Mau e ki, he aha te mea nui?
You ask, what is the most important thing?
Maku e ki, he tangata, he tangata, he tangata.
I reply, it is people, it is people, it is people.
I'm pinging my contacts to see if I can find a place to host a mirror.
I think that Oregon State Open Source Lab has a fat link to the net
and I used to know Scott K but he's moved on. If I get anywhere I'll
get back to the list.
BTW, whoever is the listmom, can you change me from digest to regular?
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.comhttp://www.bitkeeper.com
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:58:40 +0000
> From: Tim Bradshaw <tfb(a)tfeb.org>
> Subject: Re: [TUHS] HP Apollo Series 400 and DOMAIN/OS...
> To: Wilko Bulte <wb(a)freebie.xs4all.nl>
> Cc: tuhs(a)tuhs.org, asbesto <asbesto(a)freaknet.org>
> Message-ID: <CAC4A7E7-B4E5-41FA-BA05-7707366B6215(a)tfeb.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> On 21 Dec 2007, at 12:31, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >
> > You could have DomainOS take a BSD or a SysV personality. Very
> > interesting.
>
> Very tangentially, Masscomp's RTU (real time Unix) could do this
> too. Other than that I think it is definitely something best
> forgotten, as it was pretty horrid (although my memory may be biassed
> by the awfulness of the HW)
Oh, I have fond memories of the Masscomp. That's where I learned how to
do sys admin (recovered from an rm -rf /) as well as networking (based
on 4.1c BSD as I recall, plus hacks). Masscomp had a really nicely redone
version of the socket programming docs that was most helpful at the time.
I was ..!uwvax!geowhiz!geophys!lm as I recall and all the geo* were
Masscomps.
Ah, the joys of 20 users on a 40MB disk. That's why I wrote something
that turned Honeyman's time optimal but space worst case pathalias
db into O(time optimal) as well as O(space best case). Only dynamic
programming alg I've ever done and written up.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.comhttp://www.bitkeeper.com
Hi!
We just recovered an HP APOLLO Series 400 in our computer museum,
and we got the installation tapes of DOMAIN/OS. It seem a very
particular flavour of BSD 5.3. We also made a dump of the
tapes, to preserve it. :D
Does someone know more about it? What about licensing? Is
it covered by some sort of hobbyist license?
Kisses to everybody! :)
asbesto/freaknet computer museum
http://museum.freaknet.org
--
[ 73 de IW9HGS : freaknet medialab : radiocybernet : poetry hacklab]
[ http://freaknet.org/asbesto - http://papuasia.org/radiocybernet ]
[ NON SCRIVERMI USANDO LETTERE ACCENTATE! - NON MANDARMI ALLEGATI ]
[ *I DELETE* EMAIL > 100K, ATTACHMENTS, HTML, M$-WORD DOC and SPAM ]
Hi. Warren and I seem to be on opposite ends of the world network wise,
such that I am unable to rsync to minnie to keep my copy of the TUHS
archive up to date.
Does anyone out there in TUHS land have a copy they're willing to make
available for syncing?
Thanks!
Arnold Robbins
Does anyone know (remember) which Unices had .../bin/[ be a link
to .../bin/test. I remember this being the case, but it is not so on
any recent Solaris. It is the case on my Mac, so in at least one BSD
derivative. I looked through a 7th edition tarball from the archive
and it's not the case there. So my guess is that it is a BSDism, and
it probably was the case in SunOS 4 and before, and I guess on at
least 4.2BSD & later.
Thanks
--tim