On 12/24/03 00:31:27, M. Warner Losh wrote:
I think that one thing complicating the state of this
code is that
the
Uruguay Treaty restored many copyrights to many copyright holders who
had failed to put a notice in their works. However, derivitive works
done while in the public domain would still belong to the folks that
did them, if I read things correctly.
I found a document addressing the Uruguay Treaty at
http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ38b.pdf. It seems it only
applies to certain foreign works (non-US) that were previously
considered public domain in the US.
In case you haven't guessed, I'm thinking about the various include
files in the Linux kernel that SCO has claimed infringes on their
copyrights. Many of the defines and comments seem to have originated
in Unix Edition 7 and earlier. For example,
errno.h -
http://minnie.tuhs.org/UnixTree/Nsys/sys/nsys/user.h.html
and
http://minnie.tuhs.org/UnixTree/V5/usr/source/s4/errlst.c.html
signal.h -
http://minnie.tuhs.org/UnixTree/Nsys/sys/nsys/param.h.html
ioctl.h
ioctls.h -http://minnie.tuhs.org/UnixTree/V7/usr/sys/h/tty.h.html
ctype.h -
http://minnie.tuhs.org/UnixTree/V7/usr/include/ctype.h.html
stat.h -
http://minnie.tuhs.org/UnixTree/V7/usr/include/sys/stat.h.html