Re: PUPS/TUHS should not be divisive - TUHS

17 Jun 2000

kshuff &lt;kshuff(a)fast.net&gt; wrote:

...
    That might be fine and dandy for you, but other
people do not share
 your views
   and should not have to be criticized or belittled because they run
 more "modern"
   hardware and not true UNIX.  We're not all living 20 years in the
 past. 
Then why are you on this list?

--
Michael Sokolov		Harhan Engineering Laboratory
Public Service Agent	International Free Computing Task Force
			International Engineering and Science Task Force
			615 N GOOD LATIMER EXPY STE #4
			DALLAS TX 75204-5852 USA

Phone: +1-214-824-7693 (Harhan Eng Lab office)
E-mail: msokolov(a)ivan.Harhan.ORG (ARPA TCP/SMTP) (UUCP coming soon)

Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA93867
	for pups-liszt; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 04:16:41 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au)
...
 From "David O'Brien"
&lt;obrien(a)NUXI.com&gt; Sun Jun 18 04:13:45 2000 
Received: from relay.nuxi.com
(root(a)nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA93858
	for &lt;pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au&gt;; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 04:16:36 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from obrien(a)NUXI.com)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (root(a)trang.nuxi.com [209.152.133.57])
	by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA65551;
	Sat, 17 Jun 2000 11:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien(a)dragon.nuxi.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA05884;
	Sat, 17 Jun 2000 11:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien)
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 11:13:45 -0700
From: "David O'Brien" &lt;obrien(a)NUXI.com&gt;
To: Michael Sokolov &lt;msokolov(a)ivan.Harhan.ORG&gt;
Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Subject: Re: PUPS/TUHS should not be divisive
Message-ID: &lt;20000617111345.H69941(a)dragon.nuxi.com&gt;
Reply-To: obrien(a)NUXI.com
References: &lt;0006171504.AA02620(a)ivan.Harhan.ORG&gt;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: &lt;0006171504.AA02620(a)ivan.Harhan.ORG&gt;; from msokolov(a)ivan.Harhan.ORG on
Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 10:04:30AM -0500
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 10:04:30AM -0500, Michael Sokolov wrote:
...
  If it isn't Ritchie and Thompson's original
UNIX code, then it isn't UNIX. 
That is a fine opinion, and one understandable.  BUT, I don't see Joy,
McKusick, or Lefler on your list.  So why is it again that you do 4.3BSD
rather than some System III/V + 2BSD??  Joy & McKusick modified the AT&T
kernel quite a bit.  Or did you not know that they touched that code.

-- 
-- David    (obrien(a)NUXI.com)

Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA94035
	for pups-liszt; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 04:44:49 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au)