25 Jun
2024
25 Jun
'24
12:51 p.m.
The lack of a monospaced font is, I suspect, due
either to
physical limitations of the C/A/T phototypesetter[1] or fiscal
limitations--no budget in that department to buy photographic
plates for Courier.
Since the C/A/T held only four fonts, there was no room for
Courier. But when we moved beyond that typesetter, inertia
kept the old ways . Finally, in v9, I introduced the fixed-width
"literal font", L, in -man and said goodbye to boldface in
synopses. By then, though, Research Unix was merely a
local branch of the Unix evolutionary tree, so the literal-font
gene never spread.
Doug
25 Jun
25 Jun
4:13 p.m.
New subject: Documenting a set of functions with -man
[looping the groff list back in; Doug's reply went to TUHS]
At 2024-06-25T08:51:39-0400, Douglas McIlroy wrote:
The TUHS list is a good place to solicit recollections about the CAT-4
and CAT-8 models. I surmise (mostly based on some Henry Spencer
"cat2dit" code that I cannot now lay my hands on) that the model numbers
indicated the number of mounting positions in the font plate carousel.
Does anyone have any recollections of dealing with the CAT-8?
I had assumed that Kernighan & Ritchie got their hands on a CAT-8 during
the course of preparing _The C Programming Language_ (1978), since it
exhibited use of Courier (upright, normal weight only) alongside Times:
roman and italic, and, for headings, bold.
Looking over the pages of the book now, though, it occurs to me that
K&R might have managed to set it with a CAT-4 by eschewing the special
font S, using Courier roman in its place. A glance over a few dozen
pages does not reveal to me any of the unique symbols from the special
font, not even ASCII characters that GSI's Times roman lacked.[1][2]
Everywhere a double-quote ", backslash \, or underscore _ is required,
it's monospaced.[3]
...but wait. On page 210 I see a times sign. ("If E is an
n-dimensional array of rank i×j× ··· ×k, then E appearing in an
expression is coverted to a pointer to an (n−1)-dimensional array with
rank j× ··· ×k.") Moreover, the capital "E" is in Courier roman. The
section sign § also appears on the same page.
So maybe they had access to a CAT-8 after all, and used a whopping 5
different font plates. Or they used a CAT-4 and had to compose many
pages in two passes. That would have been mightily tedious.
The lack of a
monospaced font is, I suspect, due either to
physical limitations of the C/A/T phototypesetter[1] or fiscal
limitations--no budget in that department to buy photographic
plates for Courier.
Since the C/A/T held only four fonts, there was no room for
Courier. But when we moved beyond that typesetter, inertia kept
the old ways.
Finally, in v9, I introduced the fixed-width "literal font", L, in
-man and said goodbye to boldface in synopses. By then, though,
Research Unix was merely a local branch of the Unix evolutionary
tree, so the literal-font gene never spread.
Regards,
Branden
[1] The groff_char(7) man page in groff 1.23.0 lists the glyph
repertoires of the GSI fonts for the convenience of those who don't
have a scan of CSTR #54 (1976) handy. The Bell System logo is
missing, though.
[2] Some interesting symbols appear on page 18. But as noted in the
text, these can be constructed via overstriking. :)
[3] The "double-quotes" appearing in Times in the book are obviously
repetitions of the single typesetter's quotes that the GSI Times
roman font had; you can see that they are not closely kerned. One
can infer ``this input''.
7:15 p.m.
New subject: Documenting a set of functions with -man
G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So maybe they had access to a CAT-8 after all, and
used a whopping 5
different font plates. Or they used a CAT-4 and had to compose many
pages in two passes. That would have been mightily tedious.
Are you certain that the bold in that book is real B font and not .bd
construct? I am not sure about the full K&R book, but the C Reference
Manual doc in vol 2 seems to have been troff'ed with .bd for bold
(while keepting R, I, S and adding CW), ditto for the UNIX Programming
doc in the same volume that similarly uses CW for program listings.
M~
7:27 p.m.
New subject: Documenting a set of functions with -man
Hi Mychaela,
At 2024-06-25T11:15:32-0800, Mychaela Falconia wrote:
G. Branden Robinson
<g.branden.robinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I definitely am not certain, and I am mindful of the possibility that
that the C Language Reference part of the book was typeset at a
different stage of production than the rest of the volume.
C was still in relative ferment at that time, as we can tell from
<https://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/cchanges.pdf>, a document that
was included in some printings of Volume 2 of the Seventh Edition Unix
manual.
Thanks for pointing out this alternative explanation.
Regards,
Branden
So maybe they had access to a CAT-8 after all,
and used a whopping 5
different font plates. Or they used a CAT-4 and had to compose many
pages in two passes. That would have been mightily tedious.
Are you certain that the bold in that book is real B font and not .bd
construct? I am not sure about the full K&R book, but the C Reference
Manual doc in vol 2 seems to have been troff'ed with .bd for bold
(while keepting R, I, S and adding CW), ditto for the UNIX Programming
doc in the same volume that similarly uses CW for program listings. 
28 Jun
28 Jun
10:07 a.m.
New subject: Documenting a set of functions with -man
Hi.
G. Branden Robinson
<g.branden.robinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> So maybe they had access to a CAT-8 after all, and used a whopping 5
> different font plates. Or they used a CAT-4 and had to compose many
> pages in two passes. That would have been mightily tedious.
Mychaela Falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org> wrote:
Are you certain that the bold in that book is real B
font and not .bd
construct? I am not sure about the full K&R book, but the C Reference
Manual doc in vol 2 seems to have been troff'ed with .bd for bold
(while keepting R, I, S and adding CW), ditto for the UNIX Programming
doc in the same volume that similarly uses CW for program listings.
The use of .bd is indeed the case. I asked. :-)
From BWK, forwarded by permission.
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 04:02:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Brian Kernighan <bwk(a)cs.princeton.edu>
To: Aharon Robbins <arnold(a)skeeve.com>
Subject: Re: can you comment
I can't find the macros we used, though I have the text itself.
I know that there were only 4 font positions, period. One of
those definitely was S, the special font. I think that we
mounted the CW font in position 3 for programs, and we used
the .bd command to simulate bold by overstriking with a small
offset. Joe Ossanna had added that to troff as a favor not
long before he died.
The source for the second edition of Programming Style, which
dates from about the same time, is consistent with this.
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024, Aharon Robbins wrote:
> https://www.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/2024-June/030267.html
>
> Question has arisen as to how you got more than 4 font families
> when setting K&R-1.
>
> Arnold
92
days inactive
95
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
arnold＠skeeve.com -
Douglas McIlroy -
G. Branden Robinson -
Mychaela Falconia