On Dec 22, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Norman Wilson <norman(a)oclsc.org> wrote:
If that's the quality of reference they accept,
there
is simply no reason to take anything they publish
as gospel. Sorry.
And you are just figuring this out now ;-) (Yes. Rhetorical. I know!)
I see they finally fixed the bits in the 'Ethernet' entry explaining the reason
for the 1518 byte maximum length of an Ethernet frame. How many Wikipedia authors even
know how to *spell* 'vampire tap'?
For even more giggles, search on something like 'what is the reason for the minimum
size of an Ethernet frame'. When I'm bored, I do. Who can't be impressed
by gems like this?:
Why is a minimum ethernet frame size necessary?
Answers
Best Answer: By defining the minimum ethernet frame size, you ensure that all necessary
information is being transferred at each transmission. The minimum frame size breaks down
like this:
Size is 64 bytes.
Destination Address (6 bytes)
Source Address (6 bytes)
Frame Type (2 bytes)
Data (46 bytes)
CRC Checksum (4 bytes)
46 bytes must be transmitted at a minumum, with additional pad bytes added to meet frame
requirements.
Source(s):
10 years in the IT industry
Who needs Dave Chapelle when you have answers.yahoo.com?!?
--lyndon
P.S.
yahoo.com - the people bringing you DMARC. Coincidence? I think not!