25 Jan
2020
25 Jan
'20
9 p.m.
Hi folks,
I've been adding a history subsection to the groff_man(7) page for the
next groff release (date TBD) and thanks to the TUHS archives I've been
able to answer almost all the questions I had about the origins of the
man(7) language's macros and registers (number and string).
I'm inlining my findings in rendered and source form below, but there's
one feature I haven't been able to sort out--where did .SB (small bold)
come from? The oldest groff release I can find online is 1.02 (June
1991), and .SB is already there, but I can't find it anywhere else. Is
it a GNUism? Did it perhaps appear in a proprietary Unix first?
I'm aware of Kristaps Dzonsons's history of Unix man pages[1], but
unfortunately for me that is more of a history of the *roff system(s),
and does not have much detail about the evolution of the man(7) macro
language itself.
If you can shed any light on this, I'd appreciate it!
History
Version 7 Unix (1979) supported all of the macros described in this
page not listed as extensions, except .P, .SB, and the deprecated .AT
and .UC. The only string registers defined were R and S; no number
registers were documented. .UC appeared in 3BSD (1980) and .P in AT&T
Unix System III (1980). 4BSD (1980) added lq and rq string registers.
4.3BSD (1986) added .AT and AT&T's .P. DEC Ultrix 11 (1988) added the
Tm string register.
.\" ====================================================================
.SS History
.\" ====================================================================
.
Version\~7 Unix (1979) supported all of the macros described in this
page not listed as extensions,
except
.BR .P ,
.BR .SB ,
.\" .SS was implemented in tmac.an but not documented in man(7).
and the deprecated
.BR .AT
and
.BR .UC .
.
The only string registers defined were
.B R
and
.BR S ;
no number registers were documented.
.
.B .UC
appeared in 3BSD (1980) and
.B .P
in AT&T Unix System\~III (1980).
.
4BSD (1980) added
.\" undocumented .VS and .VE macros to mark regions with 12-point box
.\" rules (\[br]) as margin characters, as well as...
.B lq
and
.B rq
string registers.
.
4.3BSD (1986) added
.\" undocumented .DS and .DE macros for "displays", which are .RS/.RE
.\" wrappers with filling disabled and vertical space of 1v before and
.\" .5v after, as well as...
.B .AT
and
AT&T's
.BR .P .
.
DEC Ultrix\~11 (1988) added the
.B Tm
string register.
.
.\" TODO: Determine provenance of .SB.
Regards,
Branden
[1] https://manpages.bsd.lv/history.html
26 Jan
26 Jan
1:13 a.m.
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
I'm inlining my findings in rendered and source
form below, but there's
one feature I haven't been able to sort out--where did .SB (small bold)
come from? The oldest groff release I can find online is 1.02 (June
1991), and .SB is already there, but I can't find it anywhere else. Is
it a GNUism? Did it perhaps appear in a proprietary Unix first?
I see .SB used in the
C Manual - Language
Edited by R.P.A. Collinson
Document No: DOC/UNIX.K3.10/1
and UKC IO Library docs also from Collinson at Univ. of Kent.
as found in the usenix-78-uk1 tape.
Maybe that is uk1.tar at
https://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Applications/Spencer_Tapes/
I also see a SB Stymie Bold font in v7 troff.
1:36 a.m.
Thanks for the quick follow-up, Reed!
At 2020-01-25T13:13:44-0600, reed(a)reedmedia.net wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
There's definitely an .SB macro used in that and a few other *roff
documents in the uk1 archive, all of which have filenames ending in
".n".
They're not laid out like man pages, there's no tmac.n file in the
archive, and the macros used don't seem to come from Matt Bishop's News
macro package, also named tmac.n.
Given the absence of the macro package source it's hard to say what the
semantics of these documents' ".SB" might be. They appear to be used as
section headings, but C function prototypes are used with them as well.
But since a C library is being documented alongside the language, maybe
that's not too surprising.
I'm inlining my findings in rendered and
source form below, but
there's one feature I haven't been able to sort out--where did .SB
(small bold) come from? The oldest groff release I can find online
is 1.02 (June 1991), and .SB is already there, but I can't find it
anywhere else. Is it a GNUism? Did it perhaps appear in a
proprietary Unix first?
I see .SB used in the
C Manual - Language
Edited by R.P.A. Collinson
Document No: DOC/UNIX.K3.10/1
and UKC IO Library docs also from Collinson at Univ. of Kent.
as found in the usenix-78-uk1 tape.
Maybe that is uk1.tar at
https://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Applications/Spencer_Tapes/ I also see a SB Stymie Bold font in v7 troff.
That's a different namespace. Something it took me an embarrassingly
long to figure out was the ridiculously terse naming convention of *roff
font description files.
The "foundry" name gets the first letter, and after that you get "R"
for
roman, "B" for bold, "I" for italic, "BI" for bold italic,
and "S" for a
"special" font (symbols for math typesetting or dingbats). Bold and
italics didn't apply to special fonts.
So, if your system has Helvetica you'll have files called:
HR
HB
HI
HBI
If my guess is right, alongside Stymie Bold you'll see SR, SI, and
possibly SBI as well.
Regards,
Branden
1793
days inactive
1793
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
G. Branden Robinson -
reed＠reedmedia.net