28 May
2003
28 May
'03
1:14 p.m.
I just saw this:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/nosecrets/
This either Very Smart or Very Dumb, I'm not sure which. I don't know
that it need be discussed to death on this list, either, but I do figure
that the list members will at least be interested in it.
Arnold
28 May
28 May
2:07 p.m.
--- Aharon Robbins <arnold(a)skeeve.com> wrote:
I just saw this:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/nosecrets/
This either Very Smart or Very Dumb, I'm not sure which. I don't know
that it need be discussed to death on this list, either, but I do figure
that the list members will at least be interested in it.
Arnold
I think the intent is to to demonstrate that they did not value their trade
secrets and did not make an effort to (even just a show of an effort) to defend
them. By showing that tens of thousands of people had access to the UNIX
source that was supposed to be a secret and SCO not going after any of them
(unlike, say, Microsoft's defending Windows source) will weaken their arguments
that these were valuable trade secrets.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
7844
days inactive
7844
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Aharon Robbins -
Kenneth Stailey