On Apr 15, 22:41, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Milo Velimirovic wrote:
> QBUS 11/2 11/03 11/23 11/53 11/73 11/83
> Unibus 11/05 11/10 11/15 11/20 11/24 11/3411/35 11/40 11/44 11/45 11/55
11/60 11/70 11/84...
Two additions to make the list officially complete:
QBUS: 11/93
Unibus: 11/94
And one more to make the list officially really complete:
Unibus: 11/04
(which, despite the numer, is more like an 11/34 than anything else).
BTW, the 11/2 is a board, not a machine. Machines with 11/2s were sold as
11/03s. And of course there's the Falcon (etc) range of boards, which used the
same microprocessors and bus interface as QBus machines, but had memory and I/O
integrated onto one board. They're not really PDP-11s, though.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA06065
for pups-liszt; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 07:57:26 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to
owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
From Johnny Billquist <bqt(a)Update.UU.SE> Thu Apr
16 07:56:14 1998
Received: from Zeke.Update.UU.SE (2026(a)Zeke.Update.UU.SE
[130.238.11.14])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA06060
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 07:56:52 +1000 (EST)
Received: from localhost (bqt@localhost)
by Zeke.Update.UU.SE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA12901;
Wed, 15 Apr 1998 23:56:16 +0200
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 23:56:14 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Johnny Billquist <bqt(a)Update.UU.SE>
To: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: PDP-11 Addressing Modes
In-Reply-To: <9804152208.ZM16395(a)indy.dunnington.york.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.VUL.3.93.980415234941.9250J-100000(a)Zeke.Update.UU.SE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Pete Turnbull wrote:
On Apr 14, 23:53, Allison J Parent wrote:
<What do people here on the list think of the
flexibility and
<generality of the PDP-11's addressing modes? Is this a well thought
<out architecture in your view? How are the PDP-11's addressing modes
<better or worse than those of other processors, past and present?
Personally I consider it a high point in 16 bit computing and one that
is a standard of comparison. VAX carried this to the 32bit realm. I
know of few 16 bit microprocessors that are as capable as the PDP-11
and as fast (the ti9900 was good but slow, Z8000 was close).
Don't forget the 68000. Motorola deliberately adopted a lot of similar design
features for the 68K; there's a very interesting design paper still available
called "Design Philosophy Behind Motorola's 68000", publication no.AR208.
The
same sort of instruction/address-mode orthogonality as found in the PDP11, is
one of the big features.
You got to be kidding?!?
<FLAME ON>
The 68K is a miserable beast at the best of times.
Separated address and data registers, PC is a special register, some
addressing modes are not allowed in some instructions, some manipulations
can only be done on data register, not address registers, immediate mode
is just an assembler fake, it's actually another instruction, the
semantics of some instructions differ depending on what type of arguments
you use, writing PIC can be a real pain unless you have the 68K20. The
list is long and sad.
The 68K is what happens if you take a good design (PDP-11) and mungle up
every part of the design. It's like if they never really understood why
the PDP-11 was done they way it was, and copied the parts they though
nifty and continued with adding their own strange ideas on top of it.
<FLAME OFF>
Having said all this, it's still a nice thing compared to Intel stuff, I
guess. :-) (But I've only programmed the Z80...)
Johnny
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt(a)update.uu.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA06096
for pups-liszt; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 08:01:13 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to
owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
From John Holden
<johnh(a)psychvax.psych.usyd.edu.au> Thu Apr 16 08:00:52 1998
Received: from
psychvax.psych.usyd.edu.au (psychvax.psych.usyd.edu.au [129.78.83.1])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA06090
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 08:01:08 +1000 (EST)
Received: (from johnh@localhost)
by psychvax.psych.usyd.edu.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA06424
for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 08:00:52 +1000
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 08:00:52 +1000
From: John Holden <johnh(a)psychvax.psych.usyd.edu.au>
Message-Id: <199804152200.IAA06424(a)psychvax.psych.usyd.edu.au>
To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: PDP-11 Newbie Alert --- (gotta start somewhere)
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
Well, as far as I know, all of the already have
switching supplies...
Possibly not the 11/15 and 11/20, but if anyone has one of those, and
makes such a modification, I *will* brand him as an heretic. :-)
The 11/20 used a switch mode power supply (H720) (I still have a
functional machine!). You would have to go back to something like a PDP8/e
(got one of these two!) for a huge linear power supply. It has a huge SCR for
the overvoltage crowbar in order to dump all the energy in the filter capacitors
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA06106
for pups-liszt; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 08:01:19 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to
owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
From Johnny Billquist <bqt(a)Update.UU.SE> Thu Apr
16 08:00:20 1998
Received: from Zeke.Update.UU.SE (2026(a)Zeke.Update.UU.SE
[130.238.11.14])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA06088
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 08:00:32 +1000 (EST)
Received: from localhost (bqt@localhost)
by Zeke.Update.UU.SE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id AAA12933;
Thu, 16 Apr 1998 00:00:22 +0200
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 00:00:20 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Johnny Billquist <bqt(a)Update.UU.SE>
To: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
cc: PDP Unix Preservation <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Subject: Re: PDP-11 Newbie Alert --- (gotta start somewhere)
In-Reply-To: <9804152230.ZM16484(a)indy.dunnington.york.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.VUL.3.93.980415235648.9250K-100000(a)Zeke.Update.UU.SE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Pete Turnbull wrote:
On Apr 15, 22:41, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Milo Velimirovic wrote:
> QBUS 11/2 11/03 11/23 11/53 11/73 11/83
> Unibus 11/05 11/10 11/15 11/20 11/24 11/3411/35 11/40 11/44 11/45 11/55
11/60 11/70 11/84...
Two additions to make the list officially
complete:
QBUS: 11/93
Unibus: 11/94
And one more to make the list officially really complete:
Unibus: 11/04
(which, despite the numer, is more like an 11/34 than anything else).
Sigh. Why can't I get the last word. :-)
Is there anyone who can figure out any more models?
BTW, the 11/2 is a board, not a machine. Machines
with 11/2s were sold as
11/03s. And of course there's the Falcon (etc) range of boards, which used the
same microprocessors and bus interface as QBus machines, but had memory and I/O
integrated onto one board. They're not really PDP-11s, though.
Eh? I'd definitely say that the Falcon was a PDP-11, it does sport a F11.
Actually, it was called the 11/21, or something like that, wasn't it?
But it was a board, and not a machine...
What about the VT103?
Johnny
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt(a)update.uu.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA06285
for pups-liszt; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 09:08:21 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to
owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f