Norman Wilson writes:
John Gilmore:
Yes -- but [Bell Labs'] administration was anything but egalitarian or
meritocratic. I know someone who had immense trouble getting inside the
door at the Labs because "all" he had was a bachelor's degree. Let
their character be judged by how they treated a stranger.
Sign me proud to have succeeded in life with no degrees at all,
====
That was where local management came in.
I have no degrees at all. I haven't been nearly as
successful in many ways as John, but I was recruited
and hired by 1127. That I had no degree meant I was
initially hired as a `special technical assistant'
rather than a `member of technical staff,' but my
department head and director and executive director
(the last was the legendary Vic Vyssotsky) worked
tirelessly on my behalf, without my pushing them at
all, to get me upgraded, and succeeded after I'd been
there about a year. It was only later that I realized
just how much work they'd done on my behalf.
The upgrade gave me a big raise in pay, but I was
young enough and nerdy enough not to notice.
Within the 1127 culture there was no perceptible
difference; it was very much an egalitarian culture.
I felt respected as an equal from the start (really
from the day and a half I spent interviewing there).
Not every part of the Labs, let alone AT&T, was like
that, especially outside of the Research area. I
didn't realize it initially but that was one of the
ways I benefited from the success of UNIX (that 1127's
and 112's management could push past such bureaucratic
barriers).
After all, Ken never had more than an MS.
Having spend time in both areas 10 and 20, there were more advanced degrees
in area 10. But, it was really low key. You wouldn't know unless you asked.
One of the nice benefits at BTL is that they had a program for employees to
get advanced degrees. I was told that if I decided to work there post college
that I would need to plan on going for an advanced degree.
There are many different definitions of success. I agree that John was successful
at making money, and as being part of a team that made free software what it is
today. But that's not the definition for pre-divestiture BTL. They were a research
and development lab. Success meant blazing new trails and inventing. I don't
think that BTL was specifically looking for people with PhDs, they were looking for
people who had a history of doing good research. During most of BTLs history one
found those people by reading dissertations. People who had no degree, much less
an advanced degree, were researcher-wannabees, not proven researchers. They didn't
hire Shannon because they liked his name, I'd guess that his master's theses
opened
the door.
Another way to look at it is that one could certainly become financially successful
by reimplementing tar as free software, but the invention of tar is successful
research.
The only way that I got my foot in the door was because Heinz and Carl knew me through
the Explorer Scout post. My unscientific survey of summer students was that they either
came from scouts, or were people working on advanced degrees in college.
Jon