Re: [pups] Y2K problem in ftpd? - TUHS

5 Feb 2001

Dear All,
IIRC the start of this thread stated that this was on a 2.11 system.  If this
was so has anyone submitted the patch to Steve Schultz for consideration as a
formal update?

Appologies if this has already been done.

Rgds

Robin

Received: (from major@localhost)
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA66960
	for pups-liszt; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 04:01:38 +1100 (EST)
	(envelope-from owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au)
...
 From "Steven M. Schultz"
&lt;sms(a)moe.2bsd.com&gt; Tue Feb  6 02:51:34 2001 
Received: from moe.2bsd.com
(MOE.2BSD.COM [206.139.202.200])
	by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA66955
	for &lt;pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au&gt;; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 04:01:30 +1100 (EST)
	(envelope-from sms(a)moe.2bsd.com)
Received: (from sms@localhost)
	by moe.2bsd.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f15GpYd11283
	for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:51:34 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:51:34 -0800 (PST)
From: "Steven M. Schultz" &lt;sms(a)moe.2bsd.com&gt;
Message-Id: &lt;200102051651.f15GpYd11283(a)moe.2bsd.com&gt;
To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Subject: Re: [pups] Y2K problem in ftpd?
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
Precedence: bulk

Hi --

...
  From: robin.birch(a)postoffice.co.uk
 IIRC the start of this thread stated that this was on a 2.11 system.  If this
 was so has anyone submitted the patch to Steve Schultz for consideration as a
 formal update? 
	Don't worry - I saw the thread.   Consider the patch submitted :)

	I did find it fascinating that the bug slipped thru since at one time
	a (obviously not detailed enough) scan of the system for 'tm_year'
	references was done.

	Thanks!

	Steven Schultz
	sms(a)moe.2bsd.com