31 Dec
2018
31 Dec
'18
8:28 a.m.
But wasn't it tsort that did the heavy lifting to
get things in order?
An amusing notion. Having written tsort, I can assure you it couldn't
lift anything heavy--it used the most naive quadratic algorithm. But
it was good enough for libc.
Doug
31 Dec
31 Dec
9:34 a.m.
New subject: Deleted lib1 and lib2 in v6, recoverable?
On Dec 30, 2018, at 8:28 PM, Doug McIlroy <doug(a)cs.dartmouth.edu> wrote:
I don’t see tsort anywhere on the system, is it v7 or an addon to v6?
Thanks,
Will
But
wasn't it tsort that did the heavy lifting to get things in order?
An amusing notion. Having written tsort, I can assure you it couldn't
lift anything heavy--it used the most naive quadratic algorithm. But
it was good enough for libc.
Doug 
12:52 p.m.
New subject: Deleted lib1 and lib2 in v6, recoverable?
Not in v6. Showed up in V7.
-----Original Message-----
From: TUHS <tuhs-bounces(a)minnie.tuhs.org> On Behalf Of Will Senn
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2018 10:35 PM
To: Doug McIlroy <doug(a)cs.dartmouth.edu>
Cc: tuhs(a)tuhs.org
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Deleted lib1 and lib2 in v6, recoverable?
On Dec 30, 2018, at 8:28 PM, Doug McIlroy <doug(a)cs.dartmouth.edu>
wrote:
I don’t see tsort anywhere on the system, is it v7 or an addon to v6?
Thanks,
Will
But
wasn't it tsort that did the heavy lifting to get things in order?
An amusing notion. Having written tsort, I can assure you it couldn't
lift anything heavy--it used the most naive quadratic algorithm. But
it was good enough for libc.
Doug
2182
days inactive
2182
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Doug McIlroy -
ron＠ronnatalie.com -
Will Senn