8 Apr
2024
8 Apr
'24
3:02 p.m.
I wonder if anyone can shed any light on the timing and rationale for
the introduction of “word erase” functionality to the kernel terminal
driver. My surface skim earlier leads me to believe it came to Unix
with 4BSD, but it was not reincorporated into 8th Edition or later,
nor did it make it to Plan 9 (which did incorporate ^U for the "line
kill" command). TOPS-20 supports it via the familiar ^W, but I'm not
sure about other PDP-10 OSes (Lars?). Multics does not support it.
VMS does not support it.
What was the proximal inspiration? The early terminal drivers seem to
use the Multics command editing suite (`#` for erase/backspace, `@`
for line kill), though at some point that changed, one presumes as
TTYs fell out of favor and display terminals came to the fore.
- Dan C.
8 Apr
8 Apr
3:15 p.m.
In 1981 I was a grad student at CMU, which was running 4.1 or 4.2 at the
time. I had spent the previous three years at IBM Research where someone
had built some editing stuff into the command line machinery for CMS.
I implemented some input line editing stuff both for the Perq and as a
module for the one of the UNIX shells and shared them with some of the
systems folks at CMU. I do not know if they were adopted from my
implementations ... I am inclined to think not ... there was significant
skepticism of the value of command line editing among some of the systems
folks.
But the idea of retrieving previous command lines and editing the command
line was emerging as a thing in the early 1980s.
=====
nygeek.net
mindthegapdialogs.com/home <https://www.mindthegapdialogs.com/home>
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:03 AM Dan Cross <crossd(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I wonder if anyone can shed any light on the timing
and rationale for
the introduction of “word erase” functionality to the kernel terminal
driver. My surface skim earlier leads me to believe it came to Unix
with 4BSD, but it was not reincorporated into 8th Edition or later,
nor did it make it to Plan 9 (which did incorporate ^U for the "line
kill" command). TOPS-20 supports it via the familiar ^W, but I'm not
sure about other PDP-10 OSes (Lars?). Multics does not support it.
VMS does not support it.
What was the proximal inspiration? The early terminal drivers seem to
use the Multics command editing suite (`#` for erase/backspace, `@`
for line kill), though at some point that changed, one presumes as
TTYs fell out of favor and display terminals came to the fore.
- Dan C.
3:18 p.m.
Dan Cross <crossd(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I wonder if anyone can shed any light on the timing
and rationale for
the introduction of “word erase” functionality to the kernel terminal
driver. My surface skim earlier leads me to believe it came to Unix
with 4BSD, but it was not reincorporated into 8th Edition or later,
nor did it make it to Plan 9 (which did incorporate ^U for the "line
kill" command). TOPS-20 supports it via the familiar ^W, but I'm not
sure about other PDP-10 OSes (Lars?). Multics does not support it.
VMS does not support it.
What was the proximal inspiration? The early terminal drivers seem to
use the Multics command editing suite (`#` for erase/backspace, `@`
for line kill), though at some point that changed, one presumes as
TTYs fell out of favor and display terminals came to the fore.
- Dan C.
My memory jibes with this -- through V7 defaults were # and @, and BSD
changed to ^H / DEL and ^U. ^W was a BSD thing, probably inspired by
TOPS-10.
There was a patch on USENET that added ^T to print the load average that
we put into the vax at Georgia Tech. A professor who'd come to us from MIT
saw it and was surprised tht we could do it on Unix. :-)
Arnold
3:29 p.m.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024, 9:18 AM <arnold(a)skeeve.com> wrote:
Dan Cross <crossd(a)gmail.com> wrote:
^T made it into BSD and lives on to this day in the BSDs. If I were catty,
I'd say real unix still can... :) too bad linux never picked it up.
Warner
I wonder if anyone can shed any light on the
timing and rationale for
the introduction of “word erase” functionality to the kernel terminal
driver. My surface skim earlier leads me to believe it came to Unix
with 4BSD, but it was not reincorporated into 8th Edition or later,
nor did it make it to Plan 9 (which did incorporate ^U for the "line
kill" command). TOPS-20 supports it via the familiar ^W, but I'm not
sure about other PDP-10 OSes (Lars?). Multics does not support it.
VMS does not support it.
What was the proximal inspiration? The early terminal drivers seem to
use the Multics command editing suite (`#` for erase/backspace, `@`
for line kill), though at some point that changed, one presumes as
TTYs fell out of favor and display terminals came to the fore.
- Dan C.
My memory jibes with this -- through V7 defaults were # and @, and BSD
changed to ^H / DEL and ^U. ^W was a BSD thing, probably inspired by
TOPS-10.
There was a patch on USENET that added ^T to print the load average that
we put into the vax at Georgia Tech. A professor who'd come to us from MIT
saw it and was surprised tht we could do it on Unix. :-)
3:59 p.m.
Dan Cross <crossd(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> TOPS-20 supports it via the familiar ^W, but I'm not sure about
> other PDP-10 OSes (Lars?).
I haven't seen it in TOPS-10. ITS doesn't have that on the "command
line", but then interaction with DDT isn't (and arguably shouldn't be)
very "wordy" anyway. Of course, TECO and EMACS has word erase. And ^W
is erase between cursor and mark so that's similar.
Warner Losh <imp(a)bsdimp.com> writes:
^T made it into BSD and lives on to this day in the
BSDs. If I were catty,
I'd say real unix still can... :) too bad linux never picked it up.
There's a whole Wikipedia page about ^T:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_key
3:39 p.m.
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 09:18:41AM -0600, arnold(a)skeeve.com wrote:
Dan Cross <crossd(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I loved and hated ^T. Logged into a 4MB Vax 780 running 4.x BSD
with 40-50 other students, the only thing that was responsive was ^T.
I really wonder how much slower that Vax was because we were all hitting
^T wondering when our compile would be done.
It was around then that I bought a 128K floppy only CP/M machine.
Slower than the Vax but it was all mine and unshared. I got way
more work done on that machine.
I wonder if anyone can shed any light on the
timing and rationale for
the introduction of ???word erase??? functionality to the kernel terminal
driver. My surface skim earlier leads me to believe it came to Unix
with 4BSD, but it was not reincorporated into 8th Edition or later,
nor did it make it to Plan 9 (which did incorporate ^U for the "line
kill" command). TOPS-20 supports it via the familiar ^W, but I'm not
sure about other PDP-10 OSes (Lars?). Multics does not support it.
VMS does not support it.
What was the proximal inspiration? The early terminal drivers seem to
use the Multics command editing suite (`#` for erase/backspace, `@`
for line kill), though at some point that changed, one presumes as
TTYs fell out of favor and display terminals came to the fore.
- Dan C.
My memory jibes with this -- through V7 defaults were # and @, and BSD
changed to ^H / DEL and ^U. ^W was a BSD thing, probably inspired by
TOPS-10.
There was a patch on USENET that added ^T to print the load average that
we put into the vax at Georgia Tech. A professor who'd come to us from MIT
saw it and was surprised tht we could do it on Unix. :-) 
4:06 p.m.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:18 AM <arnold(a)skeeve.com> wrote:
There was a patch on USENET that added ^T to print the
load average that
we put into the vax at Georgia Tech. A professor who'd come to us from MIT
saw it and was surprised tht we could do it on Unix. :-)
Chris Torek of UofMaryland.
9 Apr
9 Apr
1:51 a.m.
Chris Torek of UofMaryland.
I got it into 4.3-Reno. I did not come up with the whole thing but
Rehmi Post and I worked out how to compute %cpu without using floating
point (the original VAX-only version used FP but we had to stop doing
that when we were worried about porting to systems that lacked kernel
access to FP).
The version in current FreeBSD is fancier now though.
Chris
12 Apr
12 Apr
3:58 p.m.
On 4/8/24 18:51, Chris Torek wrote:
Around 1981 I put a similar calculation into 2BSD for the PDP-11 with no
floating point, but this was for the system load average, not the %cpu.
It just imputes a decimal point in the middle of what the processor
considers an integer.
Thanks,
/Mary Ann Horton/ (she/her/ma'am)
Award Winning Author
maryannhorton.com <https://maryannhorton.com>
Chris Torek of
UofMaryland.
I got it into 4.3-Reno. I did not come up with the whole thing but
Rehmi Post and I worked out how to compute %cpu without using floating
point (the original VAX-only version used FP but we had to stop doing
that when we were worried about porting to systems that lacked kernel
access to FP).
The version in current FreeBSD is fancier now though.
Chris
8 Apr
8 Apr
5:09 p.m.
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, arnold(a)skeeve.com wrote:
There was a patch on USENET that added ^T to print the
load average that
we put into the vax at Georgia Tech. A professor who'd come to us from MIT
saw it and was surprised tht we could do it on Unix. :-)
I like this in the BSDs and miss it when I'm on Linux.
-uso.
10:51 p.m.
On 4/8/24 08:18, arnold(a)skeeve.com wrote:
Dan Cross<crossd(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Vi had ^W for word erase long before the tty driver. It's documented in
2BSD.
I think it appeared in the tty driver as part of the new tty driver,
around 4.1C. The 4.2 stty(1) documents that you can set werase but only
with the new tty driver.
Personally I fondly recalled it from Tenex and wished for it in UNIX. I
can't recall if I lobbied for it or if anyone heard me.
Chambers and Quarterman noted the new tty driver's presence in 4.1C.
https://gunkies.org/wiki/UNIX*_System_V_and_4.1C_BSD
I wonder if anyone can shed any light on the
timing and rationale for
the introduction of “word erase” functionality to the kernel terminal
driver. My surface skim earlier leads me to believe it came to Unix
with 4BSD, but it was not reincorporated into 8th Edition or later,
nor did it make it to Plan 9 (which did incorporate ^U for the "line
kill" command). TOPS-20 supports it via the familiar ^W, but I'm not
sure about other PDP-10 OSes (Lars?). Multics does not support it.
VMS does not support it.
What was the proximal inspiration? The early terminal drivers seem to
use the Multics command editing suite (`#` for erase/backspace, `@`
for line kill), though at some point that changed, one presumes as
TTYs fell out of favor and display terminals came to the fore.
- Dan C.
My memory jibes with this -- through V7 defaults were # and @, and BSD
changed to ^H / DEL and ^U. ^W was a BSD thing, probably inspired by
TOPS-10.
2.2.5 Ioctls The ioctl system call is
essentially
identical in the two systems. The interesting differences
are in the terminal driver ioctls. Both drivers utilize the
``line discipline'' notion, allowing dynamic choice among
several protocols by the user process.
Berkeley offers several new features in 4.1C BSD over
the V7 terminal driver. Some of these are accessed as a new
line discipline (the ``new tty'' discipline), while a few
others are implemented as additional ioctl calls.
Thanks,
/Mary Ann Horton/ (she/her/ma'am)
Award Winning Author
maryannhorton.com <https://maryannhorton.com>
12 Apr
12 Apr
1:29 a.m.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024, at 15:51, Mary Ann Horton wrote:
On 4/8/24 08:18, arnold(a)skeeve.com wrote:
That makes me wonder about the timeline compared to the other tenex-inspired BSD-ism I’m
happy for: tcsh.
History here:
https://github.com/tcsh-org/tcsh/blob/master/tcsh.man.in#L10239
<https://github.com/tcsh-org/tcsh/blob/c416b8588e4012f6f90cd82262e7d30afe06bbbd/tcsh.man.in#L10239>
Dan Cross <crossd(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Vi had ^W for word erase long before the tty driver. It's documented in
2BSD.
I think it appeared in the tty driver as part of the new tty driver, around 4.1C. The 4.2
stty(1) documents that you can set werase but only with the new tty driver.
Personally I fondly recalled it from Tenex and wished for it in UNIX. I can't recall
if I lobbied for it or if anyone heard me.
Chambers and Quarterman noted the new tty driver's presence in 4.1C.
https://gunkies.org/wiki/UNIX*_System_V_and_4.1C_BSD
> 2.2.5 Ioctls The ioctl system call is essentially
> identical in the two systems. The interesting differences
> are in the terminal driver ioctls. Both drivers utilize the
> ``line discipline'' notion, allowing dynamic choice among
> several protocols by the user process.
>
> Berkeley offers several new features in 4.1C BSD over
> the V7 terminal driver. Some of these are accessed as a new
> line discipline (the ``new tty'' discipline), while a few
> others are implemented as additional ioctl calls. I wonder if anyone can shed any light on the
timing and rationale for
the introduction of “word erase” functionality to the kernel terminal
driver. My surface skim earlier leads me to believe it came to Unix
with 4BSD, but it was not reincorporated into 8th Edition or later,
nor did it make it to Plan 9 (which did incorporate ^U for the "line
kill" command). TOPS-20 supports it via the familiar ^W, but I'm not
sure about other PDP-10 OSes (Lars?). Multics does not support it.
VMS does not support it.
What was the proximal inspiration? The early terminal drivers seem to
use the Multics command editing suite (`#` for erase/backspace, `@`
for line kill), though at some point that changed, one presumes as
TTYs fell out of favor and display terminals came to the fore.
- Dan C.
My memory jibes with this -- through V7 defaults were # and @, and BSD
changed to ^H / DEL and ^U. ^W was a BSD thing, probably inspired by
TOPS-10.
8 Apr
8 Apr
4:14 p.m.
Control W, control-O et al was part of dos-8. It was all parts of the
early TOPS-10. Control-T came from Tenex which later became TOPS-20.
If VMS added it that was much later, as it was not in the early editions.
Steve Zimmerman added Control-T and all of Tenex tty features to an early
Masscomp RTU. I think Sam Added to a later version of BSD I believe.
My favorite story was that the Stanford folks modified the TOPS-20 “LOTS”
system to change what control-T returned depending on the load average. The
default would say RUNNING. LOTS reported JOGGING, WAlKING CRAWLING. But
the Adminstration made them remove the hack because it most often reported
DYING
Sent from a handheld expect more typos than usual
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:03 AM Dan Cross <crossd(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I wonder if anyone can shed any light on the timing
and rationale for
the introduction of “word erase” functionality to the kernel terminal
driver. My surface skim earlier leads me to believe it came to Unix
with 4BSD, but it was not reincorporated into 8th Edition or later,
nor did it make it to Plan 9 (which did incorporate ^U for the "line
kill" command). TOPS-20 supports it via the familiar ^W, but I'm not
sure about other PDP-10 OSes (Lars?). Multics does not support it.
VMS does not support it.
What was the proximal inspiration? The early terminal drivers seem to
use the Multics command editing suite (`#` for erase/backspace, `@`
for line kill), though at some point that changed, one presumes as
TTYs fell out of favor and display terminals came to the fore.
- Dan C.
21
days inactive
25
days old
12 comments
12 participants
participants (12)
-
arnold＠skeeve.com -
Chris Torek -
Clem Cole -
Dan Cross -
Joseph Holsten -
Larry McVoy -
Lars Brinkhoff -
Marc Donner -
Mary Ann Horton -
Rich Salz -
Steve Nickolas -
Warner Losh