8 Jul
2020
8 Jul
'20
5:45 a.m.
I usually edit it to say "Was (not Was)".
Hmmm. Wouldn't it be great if we had a Markov chain subject generator that
sourced the actual email thread contents as its driver, and then when the
topic drifted far enough, it simply replaced the subject line with a new
creation ?
Ooohhh -- another idea -- RFC5322 states that subject may occur from 0 to 1
times per email. Why don't we just delete the subject lines entirely?
Michael
(it's late. I need to poke a bear)
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 4:30 PM Jacob Goense <dugo(a)xs4all.nl> wrote:
On 2020-07-08 00:53, Dave Horsfall wrote:
--
Michael Usher
Senior Wireless Network Engineer
University of California, Santa Cruz
musher(a)ucsc.edu 831-459-3697
On one list I use, a predecessor of it used to
require a subject tag
in the form [Blah] (taken from a set of known tags); I've always hated
that, but I'm still in the habit of putting my own tag there as a
hint.
When I have tuned out of a long running thread and the topic drifts
significantly I'm always grateful to the kind soul that tags..:
Subject: Re: new [was: old]