TUHS

tuhs@tuhs.org

33 participants
6541 discussions

default license, old CSRG RCS history? and BSD share/mk/*mk files?

by Jeremy C. Reed

For 4.4BSD files, if no copyright and license is listed for specific files, does the standard UCB license apply? Is there any file or statement that says the license covers all files which don't have a specific license in 4.4BSD-Lite ? Any RCS commit history for old CSRG code? I am looking for the authors/history/copyrights for BSD share/mk/files. I see that 4.4BSD-Alpha has: r--r--r-- 3/7 792 Aug 26 05:00 1992 usr/share/mk/bsd.doc.mk r--r--r-- 3/7 3761 Aug 26 05:00 1992 usr/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk r--r--r-- 3/7 1574 Aug 26 05:00 1992 usr/share/mk/bsd.man.mk r--r--r-- 3/7 4140 Aug 26 05:00 1992 usr/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk r--r--r-- 3/7 1244 Aug 26 05:00 1992 usr/share/mk/bsd.subdir.mk r--r--r-- 3/7 1387 Aug 26 05:00 1992 usr/share/mk/sys.mk but missing the bsd.README I couldn't find these in the other old 4 and 3BSDs (via the tuhs archive). The share/mk/bsd.README from NetBSD import in 1993 has: # @(#)bsd.README 5.1 (Berkeley) 5/11/90 And sys.mk has: # @(#)sys.mk 5.11 (Berkeley) 3/13/91 And bsd.doc.mk: # @(#)bsd.doc.mk 5.3 (Berkeley) 1/2/91 _______________________________________________ TUHS mailing list TUHS(a)minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs

15 years, 10 months

New patch for 2.11BSD on PDP-11: network DEUNA does not respond to ethernet broadcasts

by Jörg Hoppe

I found and patched an error in the network driver for UNIBUS ethernet controllers DEUNA/DELUA in 2.11BSD for PDP-11. Error reproduction: -------------------------- Build 2.11 BSD with ethernet/TCP/IP support over DEUNA/DELUA controller. Configure the network. Boot up 2.11 BSD, switch to multiuser mode. Wait for 15 Minutes, until all ARP caches in the system are aged out. Try to ping the PDP-11 from a network node, which is NOT listed anywhere in the PDP-11's network configuration files. Ping will fail. Important: since arp requests are also arp responses, do not ping the test node from your PDP-11. The test node may not be contacted by the PDP-11! Before testing, verify on the test node that the PDP-11 is unkown. The command "arp -a" must not display the PDP-11 yet. You can clean the test node's arp cache by executing "arp -d *". This can also be reproduced in SimH, for example with the installation downloadable at /www.ak6dn.com/PDP-11/2.11BSD/ Error explanation: -------------------- The DEUNA/DELUA does not answer ARP requests, so other network nodes can not get the PDP-11's ethernet MACID and can not send anything to it. The DEUNA/DELUA does not answer ARP because it does not receive ethernet broadcast packets (those addressed to MACID FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF). And it is not receiving broadcasts, because the DELUA driver in /sys/pdpif/if_de.c did not set up the DELUA's packet filter to receive FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF. Error patch --------------- In /sys/pdpif/if_de.c , the DEUNA/DELUA must be programmed to receive ethernet broadcast pakets. The good way would be to explicitly add MACID FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF to the filter. The fast and dirty way was to program the DELUA to receive ALL multicasts, by setting one more bit in the mode register: In /sys/pdpif/if_de.c, change line ds->ds_pcbb.pcbb2 = MOD_TPAD|MOD_HDX; into ds->ds_pcbb.pcbb2 = MOD_TPAD|MOD_HDX|MOD_ENAL; Status ----------------------------- This is a major bug, as it prevents the PDP-11 under 2.11BSD to run as a server. It's hard to believe that it is still there. In the typical quick "boot up and ping someone" test, it is almost invisible. The bug is not present in the DELQA driver "if_qe.c". I did posted already to alt.sys.pdp11 newsgroup. The error has been acknowledeged by one other user. In the BSD patch archive, this bug seems not to be addressed. regards Joerg Hoppe _______________________________________________ TUHS mailing list TUHS(a)minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs

15 years, 11 months

Re: [TUHS] 8th ed manual sets

by Aharon Robbins

Hi All. A while back Tim wrote: > Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:25:00 -1000 (HST) > From: Tim Newsham <newsham(a)lava.net> > To: tuhs(a)minnie.tuhs.org > Cc: Uriel <uriel99(a)gmail.com> > Subject: [TUHS] 8th ed manual sets > > This might be of interest to people on this list (originally > posted to the 9fans list): > > On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Uriel wrote: > > Thanks to Fish's contribution I have made the Unix 8th Edition manuals > > available at: > > > > http://man.cat-v.org/unix_8th/ > > > > [ ... ] I asked about a tarball on 9fans, and got this reply to the list, which I'm forwarding here: | From: 0intro(a)gmail.com (David du Colombier) | Subject: Re: [9fans] off topic: manual sets | Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 22:25:28 GMT | | > Is a tarball of the 8th ed manual troff files available? | > | > The Unix Historical Society (see www.tuhs.org) would like to have this | > too, I don't doubt. | | I temporary put it online [1]. Feel free to mirror it. | | I obtained this stuff from an generous anonymous | donor few years ago. | | I thought it would be better to share it. | | [1] http://www.9grid.fr/man.tar.bz2 | | -- | David du Colombier I sent Warren a copy of the tarball. If I can steal the hour, I may try to create a PDF, just for the fun of trying. Feel free to beat me to it. :-) Thanks, Arnold _______________________________________________ TUHS mailing list TUHS(a)minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs

15 years, 11 months

4.1cBSD Anyone?

by Benjamin Huntsman

Hi all! Just curious, has anyone here managed to get 4.1cBSD (or any 4.1 for that matter) running under SIMH or any other hardware or software? How does one prepare a SIMH-format distribution tape from a collection of files? I haven't found a whole lot of information on the subject, and I imagine it'd be fairly difficult to make a root dump without a pre-existing system... Many thanks to all in advance! _______________________________________________ TUHS mailing list TUHS(a)minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs

15 years, 11 months

8th ed manual sets

by Tim Newsham

This might be of interest to people on this list (originally posted to the 9fans list): On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Uriel wrote: > Thanks to Fish's contribution I have made the Unix 8th Edition manuals > available at: > > http://man.cat-v.org/unix_8th/ > > Tons of fascinating stuff there, including the jerq docs in section 9 > ( http://man.cat-v.org/unix_8th/9/ ) and what I think is the oldest > documentation of the /proc file system > (http://man.cat-v.org/unix_8th/4/proc ). > > Fish also contributed some pages from section 1 of the Unix Writer's > Workbench: http://man.cat-v.org/unix_WWB/1/ > > Thanks again to Fish for this wonderful contributions, and of course > to the original authors of all this amazing material. > > Peace > > uriel > > P.S.: I'm still working out a couple of kinks in the web interface > that make =(1) and Mail(1) inaccessible, but almost everything else > should work fine, if you notice any problems please let me know. > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Uriel<uriel99(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Slightly off topic (of this thread), but I'm looking for troff sources >> of 8th, 9th, 10th and Plan 9 1st Editions to complete the man page >> collections at http://man.cat-v.org >> >> If anyone knows where I can find copies of any of those, I would be >> most grateful. >> >> uriel >> >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Benjamin >> Huntsman<BHuntsman(a)mail2.cu-portland.edu> wrote: >>> Sorry for the off-topic post, but I'm striking out on google, and I'm virtually certain that someone here will know... >>> >>> Does anyone happen to have the ISBN's for the 7th Edition manual set? >>> Volume I is 0-03-061742-1, but I can't seem to find the others... >>> >>> Thanks in advance! >>> >>> -Ben >>> >>> >> > > Tim Newsham http://www.thenewsh.com/~newsham/ _______________________________________________ TUHS mailing list TUHS(a)minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs

15 years, 11 months

Additions to the wiki

by Jason Stevens

I don't know if this would be the 'place' to ask, but would something like this be suitable to the TUHS wiki? http://gunkies.org/wiki/Installing_4.2_BSD_on_SIMH http://gunkies.org/wiki/Installing_4.3_BSD_Quasijarus_on_SIMH http://gunkies.org/wiki/Installing_4.3_BSD_RENO_on_SIMH http://gunkies.org/wiki/Installing_4.3_BSD_on_SIMH http://gunkies.org/wiki/Installing_Ultrix_4.0_on_SIMH I've been slowly putting together some documentation in some wiki like format on how to install various UNIXs into SIMH... Since I wrote them, they could just be wholesale imported... Anyways I don't know if they meet any standards, etc etc... Naturally I'll add 32v, 3BSD, 4BSD & 4.1BSD.... Thoughts? _______________________________________________ TUHS mailing list TUHS(a)minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs

15 years, 11 months

Re: [TUHS] UNIX turns forty

by Brian S Walden

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&art… > So when do the official celebrations begin? What's a good estimate > of the month and date in 1969 when it all began? > > Tim Newsham

16 years

6th Edition RAID

by Carl Lowenstein

I thought I remembered something interesting about 6th Edition RK05 handlers, and went back to check RK(IV) in the manual. There it is, Raid 0. "Drive numbers (minor devices) of eight and larger are treated specially. Drive 8+x is the x+1 way interleaving of devices rk0 to rkx. Thus blocks on rk10 are distributed alternately among rk0, rk1, and rk2." Goes on to enumerate precautions, like don't use the same physical drive for both normal and interleaved operation. I myself never tried this, because I didn't have enough confidence in the error-free operation of a single RK05 drive, let alone two or more. Note that this feature disappeared by the time of 7th Edition RK(4). carl -- carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego clowenstein(a)ucsd.edu _______________________________________________ TUHS mailing list TUHS(a)minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs

16 years

Unix Version Hisory...

by Lyle Bickley

There's what looks to be a detailed timeline of UNIX history here: http://www.levenez.com/unix/ Regards, Lyle -- Lyle Bickley Bickley Consulting West Inc. http://bickleywest.com "Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"

16 years

Whence the 2.x BSD numbering?

by Warren Toomey

Can anybody explain why the 2BSDs that were distributed with kernel source code are numbered 2.8BSD upwards. Why start numbering at 8? P.S Actually I have a 2.79BSD in the archive which came out in 1979 just before 2.8BSD, so could it be that the '2.79' means 1979, and numbering followed incrementally after that? Cheers, Warren

16 years

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

TUHS