I think "classlessness" is intened as an antonym to "classy".
Spafford with high dudgeon called early for punishment. He had tempered
it somewhat by the time he wrote his CACM article, published in June
1985. But still some animus shows through, in "even-handedly"
speculating about whether the worm was intended as a lark or as
something nefarious. He evidently had mellowed a lot by the
time of the last quotation below.
In the CACM article Spaff quoted someone else as suggesting that
Morris did it to impress Jodie Foster, and he called Allman's
back door in Sendmail a debugging feature that people could
optionally turn off. As far as I know it was not disclosed that
DEBUG allowed remote control of Sendmail. In fact Sendmail was
so opaque that Dave Presotto declined to install it and wrote
his own (upas) for Research.
I don't recall the cited "contest". And Dennis's reaction to
the CaCM article seems somwhat harsh. But the context is that
Spafford's overheated initial reaction did not win friends in
research.
>
> Can anyone remember or decipher what this was about???
>
> Date: 24 Mar 90 06:52:43 GMT
> From: dmr(a)alice.att.com
> Subject: Re: Contest announcement
> To: misc-security(a)uunet.uu.net
>
> My own contest is "Most appalling display of classlessness in dealing with
> a serious subject." The nominees are:
>
> 1) National Center for Computer Crime Data, Security Magazine, and
> Gene Spafford, for their "How High Shall We Hang Robert Morris?"
> contest.
>
> 2) Gene Spafford, for the most tasteless article ever to appear in CACM
> (special credits for the Jodie Foster joke).
>
> Dennis Ritchie
>
> Some context maybe?
>>
>> “He has not tried to make any money or work in this area,” Purdue
>> University computer science professor Eugene Spafford said of Morris
>> in an interview with The Washington Post. “His behavior has been
>> consistent in supporting his defense: that it was an accident and he
>> felt badly about it. I think it’s very much to his credit that that has
>> been his behavior ever since.”
Arnold:
> OK, that I can understand. It's ages since I played with
> readline, but I think you can preload the buffer it works on
> (bash does that, no?) so ed + readline could be made to work
> that way.
====
Or, if you have moved beyond the era of simulated glass
teletypes on graphics screens, you could do the editing
in the terminal (program).
It's a real shame the mux/9term way of doing things never
caught on. I suppose it is because so many people are
wedded to programs that require cursor addressing; I'm
glad I never succumbed to that.
I use ed (or its cousin qed a la Toronto) for simple stuff.
Mostly I'll use the traditional commands, but sometimes
I will, in mux/9term style, print a line with p, type
c, edit the line on the screen, pick it up and send it,
type . return.
And of course I can do that sort of thing with any program,
whether or not it is compiled with some magic library.
All this is something of a matter of taste, but I have
sometimes amazed (in a good way) my colleagues with it.
Norman Wilson
Toronto ON
Robert T Morris (the son who committed the famous worm) was an
intern at Bell Labs for a couple of summers while I was there.
He certainly wasn't an idiot; he was a smart guy.
Like many smart guys (and not-so-smart guys for that matter),
however, he was a sloppy coder, and tended not to test enough.
One of the jokes in the UNIX Room was that, had it been Bob
Morris (the father) who did it,
a. He wouldn't have done it, because he would have seen that
it wasn't worth the potential big mess; but
b. Had he done it, no one would ever have caught him, and
probably no one would even have noticed the worm as it crept
around.
Norman Wilson
Toronto ON
> From: Doug McIlroy
> A little known fact is that the judge leaned on the prosecutor to reduce
> the charge to a misdemeanor and accepted the felony only when the
> prosecuter secured specific backing from higher echelons at DOJ.
I had a tangential role in the legal aftermath, and am interested to hear
this.
I hadn't had much to do with the actual outbreak, so I was not particularly
watching the whole saga. However, on the evening news one day, I happened to
catch video of him coming out of the court-house after his conviction: from
the look on his face (he looked like his dog had died, and then someone had
kicked him in the stomach) it was pretty clear that incareration (which is
what the sentencing guidelines called for, for that offense) was totally
inappropriate.
So I decided to weigh in. I got advice from the Washington branch of
then-Hale&Dorr (my legal people at the time), who were well connected inside
the DoJ (they had people who'd been there, and also ex-H+D people were
serving, etc). IIRC, they agreed with me that this was over-charging, given
the specifics of the offender, etc. (I forget exactly what they told me of
what they made of the prosecutor and his actions, but it was highly not
positive.)
So we organized the IESG to submit a filing in the case on the sentencing, and
got everyone to sign on; apparently in the legal system when there is an
professional organization in a field, its opinions weigh heavily, and the
IESG, representing as it did the IETF, was the closest thing to it here. I
don't know how big an effect our filing had, but the judge did depart very
considerably from the sentencing guidelines (which called, IIRC, for several
years of jail-time) and gave him probation/community-service.
Not everyone was happy about our actions (particularly some who'd had to work
on the cleanup), but I think in retrospect it was the right call - yeah, he
effed up, but several years in jail was not the right punsishment, for him,
and for this particular case (no data damaged/deleted/stolen/etc). YMMV.
Noel
> the idiot hadn't tested it on an isolated network first
That would have "proved" that the worm worked safely, for
once every host was infected, all would go quiet.
Only half in jest, I have always held that Cornell was right
to expel Morris, but their reason should have been his lack
of appreciation of exponentials.
(Full disclosure: I was a character witnesss at his trial. A
little known fact is that the judge leaned on the prosecutor
to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor and accepted the felony
only when the prosecuter secured specific backing from
higher echelons at DOJ.)
Doug McIlroy
I too remember TECO. In my TOPS-10 days I was quite a whiz at it.
Then I encountered UNIX and ed, and never looked back. Cryptic
programmability is fun, but a simple but well-chosen set of
commands including the g/v pair made me more efficient in the end.
it could just be that ed is a better fit for the shape of my brain.
C struck me similarly.
Norman Wilson
Toronto ON
(Actually in the Bay Area for a few days for LISA, in case any
UNIXtorians want to meet up.)
> From: Dave Horsfall
> I'm glad that I'm not the only one who remembers TECO
Urp. I wish I _didn't_ remember TECO!
"TECO Madness: A moment of convenience, a lifetime of regret." - Dave Moon
(For those who didn't catch the reference, here:
https://www.gammalyte.com/tag/reefer-madness/
you go.)
Noel
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Jon Steinhart <jon(a)fourwinds.com> wrote:
>
> I have a similar and maybe even more extreme position. When I was a
> manager
> I placed restrictions on the tools and customizations for members of my
> team.
> My goal was to make sure that any team member could go over to any other
> team
> member's desk and get stuff done.
And I think this loops back to what started some of this threat. The idea
of a programmer with 'good taste.'
Rob (and Brian) railed on BSD in cat -v considered harmful
<http://harmful.cat-v.org/cat-v/> and ‘*Program Design in the UNIX
Environment*’ (pdf version
<http://harmful.cat-v.org/cat-v/unix_prog_design.pdf>, ps version
<http://harmful.cat-v.org/cat-v/unix_prog_design.ps>) but the points in it
was then and are still now, fresh: What is it that you need to get the job
done - to me, that is Doug's "Universal Unix" concept.
When I answer questions on quora about learning Linux and other UNIX
derivative, I still point them at their book: *The Unix Programming
Environment
<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/013937681X?ie=UTF8&tag=catv-20&linkCode=as…>*
I would say, if the can login into the system and complete the exercises in
UPE without having to make changes, you are pretty close to Doug's
"Universal UNIX" environment. And if you can use the tools, without having
to think about them and they pretty much are what you rely upon everyday,
you are getting close to my ideal of 'good taste.'
Clem
Of interest to the old farts here...
At 22:30 (but which timezone?) on this day in 1969 the first packet got as
far as "LO" ("LOGIN"?) then crashed. More details, anyone?
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
Chris Torek:
You're not perpendicular to your own surface? :-)
===
I'm not as limber as I used to be.
Besides, I'm left-handed, so what use would I have for
right angles?
Norman Wilson
Toronto ON
(I don't wish to know that)
