TUHS

tuhs@tuhs.org

19 participants
6471 discussions

National Inventors Hall of Fame honors creators of Unix

by Warren Toomey

https://www.engadget.com/2019/01/08/national-inventors-hall-of-fame-class-o… The National Inventors Hall of Fame (NIHF) joined Engadget on stage today at CES to announce its 2019 class of inductees. [ including ] ... Dennis Ritchie (Posthumous) and Ken Thompson: UNIX Operating System ------------------------------------------------------------------- Thompson and Ritchie's creation of the UNIX operating system and the C programming language were pivotal developments in the progress of computer science. Today, 50 years after its beginnings, UNIX and UNIX-like systems continue to run machinery from supercomputers to smartphones. The UNIX operating system remains the basis of much of the world's computing infrastructure, and C language -- written to simplify the development of UNIX -- is one of the most widely used languages today. Cheers, Warren

6 years, 3 months

QED archive now available

by Arnold Robbins

Hi All. Back in October I started a discussion about QED sources. A number of people were kind enough to send me tarballs and zip files as well as pointers to other archives. I have finally cobbled it all together and made it available on GitHub: https://github.com/arnoldrobbins/qed-archive I have tried to acknowledge everyone who contributed. Thanks again to all who did send me stuff and email me. Enjoy, Arnold

6 years, 3 months

off topic - capatob - saratov2 computer Russsian pdp8? HELP

by Dr Iain Maoileoin

Off topic, but looking for help and wisdom. If you visit https://www.scotnet.co.uk/iain/ <https://www.scotnet.co.uk/iain/>saratov you will see some photos of work that I have started on the front panel of a Capatob2. I plan to get the switches and lights running on a blinkenbone board with a PDP8 emulation behind it. (I already have an PDP11/70 front-panel running on the same infrastructure) I have been struggling for over a year to get much info about this saratov computer (circuit diagrams etc). So I have started the reverse engineering on the panel. Does anybody know anything about this computer? online or offline it would be much appreciated. Iain

6 years, 3 months

Gentle reminder: TUHS is for Unix

by Warren Toomey

Hi all, back from a few days holiday. Just a reminder that the TUHS list is for things related to Unix. I don't mind a bit of topic drift, but if the topic goes completely away from Unix then the conversation should migrate to the COFF (Computer Old Farts Forum) list, coff(a)tuhs.org. I'll mark the "Isaacson" thread as closed on TUHS, but feel free to continue it over on COFF. Thanks, Warren

6 years, 3 months

Re: [TUHS] Isaacson v Unix [really RMS bashing]

by Jon Steinhart

Been wanting to wade into this for a few days but needed to think about how. I think that we're all aware that RMS has atrocious personal habits. But I don't think that this mailing list is the place to discuss them unless it's somehow in the context of UNIX. Many seem to excuse RMS's revisionist view of the history of technology on the grounds that RMS claims that his memory isn't very good. I think that if he knows that he doesn't remember things then he should refrain from talking about them as if he does. As others have said, I don't conflate coding prowess with the ability to design. I've had many an argument with John Gilmore (one of the people who doesn't mind footing the cleaning and repair bill after allowing RMS to stay at his place) where he begins with "When I wrote GNU tar..." I've always responded by saying that writing tar is no big deal; the specification was the hard part. One place where I completely disagree with RMS that I think is in context for this list is his claim that Linux should be called GNU/Linux. I've written tons of software in my life, and I don't preface the name of each one with the parts list. Even if one believed that such an attribution scheme made sense, I would claim that it should be called internet/Linux. I would argue that Linux would not have happened without the internet making it possible for folks around the world to participate. And I think that there's a good chance that the tools would have been created anyway. Of course, I acknowledge that the GNU tools have been ported to Linux. Big deal. I haven't seen RMS arguing for GNU/Windows now that Microsoft has seen the light. Like many of you, Linux is not where I first started using GNU tools; I started using them on my Sun machines after Sun started charging extra for the compiler and included a licensing system that was broken and often interfered with getting work done. Jon

6 years, 3 months

Re: [TUHS] Isaacson v Unix [really RMS bashing]

by Larry McVoy

I think the RMS stuff should go away. It's not because I love the guy, I don't. It's because we have people like Ken and Rob and other heavy hitters and my hunch is they have little patience for this sort of thing (they might correct me if I'm wrong). I'd love to call out RMS on his BS but this isn't the place. This is the place for people who actually did real work on Unix to share those stories. Or so I think, it's up to Warren, not me.

6 years, 3 months

Isaacson v Unix

by Doug McIlroy

I was given a copy of Walter Isaacson's "The Innovators: How a Group of Hackers, Geniuses, and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution". It devotes ten pages to Stallman and Gnu, Torvalds and Linux, even Tannebaum and Minix, but never mentions Thompson and Ritchie. Unix is identified only as a product from Bell Labs from which the others learned something--he doesn't say what. I have heard also that Isaacson's "Idea Factory" (about Bell Labs) barely mentions Unix. Is Isaacson blind, biased, or merely brainwashed? In the case of Steve Jobs, Isaacson tells not just that the Alto system from Xerox inspired him, but also who its star creators were: Lampson, Thacker and Kay. But then he stomps on them: "Once again, the greatest innovation would come not from the people who created the breakthroughs, but from the people who applied them usefully." While he very describes innovation as a continuum from invention through engineering to marketing, he seems to be more impressed by the later stages. Or maybe he just likes to tell stories, and didn't pick up all the good ones about Ken. Isaacson describes spacewar, arguably the first stage of computer-game innovation, at great length. At the same time, all he has to say about early-stage operating systems is a single sentence that credits John McCarthy with leading a time-sharing effort at MIT. (In my recollection, McCarthy proseletized; Corbato led.) He tells how ARPANET, which he says was mainly developed by BB&N, connected time-shared computers, but breathes not a word about Berkeley's work, without which ARPANET would have been an open circuit. "Innovators" won general critical praise. A couple of reviews predicted it would become the standard of the field. However, an evidently knowledgeable review in IEEE Annals of the History of Computing faulted it for peddling familiar potted legends without really digging for deeper insight. Regarding Thompson and Ritchie, it looks more like overt suppression. Doug

6 years, 3 months

Re: [TUHS] Isaacson v Unix

by Paul McJones

> On Jan 5, 2019,Paul Winalski <paul.winalski(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > ... After Lampson > left Xerox PARC he set up a similar outfit at Digital'--the Western > Research Lab (WRL). Actually, WRL was started by Forest Baskett, formerly of Stanford University. Butler Lampson joined DEC's Systems Research Center (SRC) shortly after it was formed by former PARC manager Bob Taylor. > ... I was working in the software tools > engineering group at the time, and we would have loved to take WRL's > work and to incorporate it in our products. But we couldn't. Why? > Because they wrote everything in Modula 3, and we were using BLISS. SRC used Modula-3, and before that a similar language called Modula-2+. Originally, WRL used Modula-2, and then I think switched to C. Perhaps DEC’s engineering groups should also have switched from Bliss to C. > Yes, PARC invented the modern windows-based GUI, but, as with so many > PARC innovations, Xerox did nothing with it. Based on how the PARC > alumni at WRL behaved at DEC,I would argue that this was the fault of > PARC as much as of Xerox management. Xerox built its Star office automation system based on PARC technology and with lots of support from PARC. Star was of course not a big success. PARC also invented laser printers, and Xerox made quite a bit of money from them. Paul McJones (former Xerox SDD and DEC SRC member — I have been on both sides of the fence)

6 years, 3 months

Re: [TUHS] Isaacson v Unix

by Doug McIlroy

>>I have heard also that Isaacson's "Idea Factory" (about Bell Labs) > Did you mean the work of this title by Jon Gertner? Indeed. If should fact-check myself if I'm going to challenge some one else's choice of facts. Thanks for the catch, Doug

6 years, 3 months

Re: [TUHS] Isaacson v Unix

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

>> From: Doug McIlroy >> I have heard also that Isaacson's "Idea Factory" (about Bell Labs) > Did you mean the work of this title by Jon Gertner? (I have yet to pull > down my copy to see what it says about Unix I looked, and it too says next to nothing about Unix (which it describes as a "programming language" - pg. 346). Oh well. This is really a pretty serious omission, given that the vast majority of mobile devices now run Android, which is a Unix derivative (Linux). So just about everyone has a Unix-derived thing in their pocket. Noel

6 years, 3 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

TUHS