We retired gets from Research UNIX back in 1984 or perhaps
earlier, with no serious pain because replacing it wasn't
hard and everybody agreed with the reason.
I'm glad to hear some part of the rest of the world is
catching up.
We also decided to retire the old Enigma-derived crypt(1),
except we didn't want to throw it out entirely in case
someone had an old encrypted file and wanted the contents
back. So it was removed from the manual and the binary
moved to /usr/games.
Norman Wilson
Toronto ON
Seen in the FreeBSD Quarterly Report:
gets(3) retirement
Contact: Ed Maste <emaste(a)FreeBSD.org>
gets is an obsolete C library routine for reading a string from
standard input. It was removed from the C standard as of C11 because
there was no way to use it safely. Prompted by a comment during Paul
Vixie's talk at vBSDCon 2017 I started investigating what it would take
to remove gets from libc.
The patch was posted to Phabricator and refined several times, and the
portmgr team performed several exp-runs to identify ports broken by the
removal. Symbol versioning is used to preserve binary compatibility for
existing software that uses gets.
The change was committed in September, and will be in FreeBSD 13.0.
This project was sponsored by The FreeBSD Foundation.
And the world is a slightly safer place...
-- Dave
I'm looking for a reference to any Unix ports where the kernel ran in
a non-paged address space and user mode was paged. I could swear this
was done at some point, and memory says it was on a soft-TLB system
like the MIPS, to avoid TLB pollution and TLB fault overhead.
But maybe I'm nuts. I am happy to hear either answer.
I had a hand-held degausser, but lent it to someone years ago
and never got it back.
It was actually Exabyte that made me buy it. I bought a new
8505 through a reseller to supersede the 8200 I was using for
home backups. It turned out the 8505's firmware refused to
overwrite a tape already written at any but the highest density,
so I couldn't reuse any of my existing backup tapes. Exabyte
insisted it was a feature, not a bug. So I gave up and bought
a degausser so I could turn a used tape into a blank tape so
the damn tape drive would write on it.
For further vintage-computing amusement: I decided to buy at
that time because the reseller had arranged a deal with Exabyte:
trade in any old tape drive, working or not, and get a couple of
hundred bucks off on a brand-new 8505. So I gave the reseller
an old, broken TK05 I had lying around. My sales contact for
the reseller was a former service tech at the same company, so
I figured (correctly) he'd get the joke.
Norman Wilson
Toronto ON
Snotty remarks aside, I have a couple of Exabyte drives in my
home world. They haven't been used for a long time, but when
they were (for some years I used them as a regular backup device)
they worked just fine.
I've pinged the guy.
Norman Wilson
Toronto ON
I keep a copy of the utzoo files.
And then I hacked the altavista desktop search the files using Apache to filter content inline.
https://altavista.superglobalmegacorp.com/altavista
I know I'd love to feed it more data, the utzoo stuff is massive for 1991, but it's really trivial for 2019. It's around 10GB decompressed.
From: TUHS <tuhs-bounces(a)minnie.tuhs.org> on behalf of Larry McVoy <lm(a)mcvoy.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019, 11:53 AM
To: Bakul Shah
Cc: tuhs(a)tuhs.org
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Steve Bellovin recounts the history of USENET
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 07:50:53PM -0800, Bakul Shah wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 19:14:23 -0800 Larry McVoy wrote:
> > Yeah, I'd be super happy if he joined the list. I enjoyed reading
> > those, wished he had gone into more detail.
> >
> > On the Usenet topic, does anyone remember dejanews? Searchable
> > archive of all the posts to Usenet. Google bought them and then,
> > so far as I know, the searchable part went away.
> >
> > If someone knows how to search back to the beginnings of Usenet,
> > my early tech life is all there, I'd love to be able to show my kids
> > that. Big arguing with Mash on comp.arch, following Guy Harris on
> > comp.unix-wizards, etc.
>
> I have occasionally downloaded some mbox.zip files from
> https://archive.org/details/usenet
> But there are too many files there. Would be nice if there
> was a collaborative effort to organize them in a more usable,
> searchable state. Pretty much all of it (minus binaries
> groups) can be stored locally (or using some global
> namespace.
So is that all of Usenet?
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at mcvoy.comhttp://www.mcvoy.com/lm
Dear All:
I was wondering if anyone had any first-hand information about the early decisions at Western Electric to make an education license for Unix that was both royalty-free and with an extremely modest “service charge”/delivery fee, or if anyone knows the names of key people who made these decisions.
Best wishes,
David
..............
David C. Brock
Director and Curator
Software History Center
Computer History Museum
computerhistory.org/softwarehistory<http://computerhistory.org/softwarehistory>
Email: dbrock(a)computerhistory.org
Twitter: @dcbrock
Skype: dcbrock
1401 N. Shoreline Blvd.
Mountain View, CA 94943
(650) 810-1010 main
(650) 810-1886 direct
Pronouns: he, him, his
> From: Arnold Robbins
> The Bell Labs guys in some ways were too.
And there's the famous? story about the Multics error messages in Latin,
courtesty of Bernie Greenberg. One actually appeared at a customer site once,
whereupon hilarity ensued.
Noel
Clem Cole:
Al Arms
wrote and administer the license BTW.
====
Aside for entertainment purposes: at one point, the root
password for the UNIX systems I ran in the Caltech High
Energy Physics group was derived from Al's name, but through
a level of punning indirection. I believe Mark Bartelt
came up with it.
Later we decided to change it. I believe I chose the
successor, which continued the UNIX-licensing scheme, but
in a different direction:
*UiaTMoBL
The systems that had either of these passwords are long-
since turned off.
Norman Wilson
Toronto ON