4 Jan
2017
4 Jan
'17
4:10 a.m.
On Jan 3, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Clem Cole
<clemc(a)ccc.com> wrote:
If you even looked at it, Ellis does some really imaginative coding (compiling the
internal loop in a data block and jump to it), it all portable and actually very easy to
understand. For one thing the comments are there and very, clear.
But that's not going to survive modern W^X. Unless you compile to interpreted
byte-code, which mostly wipes out the inline loop unroll to machine code, no?