25 Mar
2016
25 Mar
'16
4:50 a.m.
On 2016-Mar-24 11:17:18 +0100, Johnny Billquist <bqt(a)update.uu.se> wrote:
It is the normal behavior of any instruction that
interrupts are not
recognized until the next instruction fetch. This is how the microcode
works, and it is also pretty much the same in any processor today.
...
individual instructions. You still get a fetch between
each instruction,
at which point, interrupts will be recognized.
Some instructions inhibit the "check for interrupts at the end of this
instruction" check. I'm most familiar with the 8080 EI instruction,
which enabled interrupts after the following instruction (so things like
EI;HLT didn't have a window). It seems the PDP-11 SPL behaves the same.
memory access to get the actual content. The fun thing
happens if you
set the indirect bit, and give your own address. This is then an
infinite memory reference. And the KA10 can not be broken out of that
lookup. The only solution is to pull the power plug.
I can't think of any modern architectures that still support this sort
of indefinite indirection but I know the ITT 3200 (custom CPU for
controlling telephone exchanges) could do this. In it's case, a normal
front-panel reset would recover.
--
Peter Jeremy