20 Apr
2012
20 Apr
'12
2:37 a.m.
I mean that after you used netbsd to create
and install 44bsd, you should have used the resulting
44bsd to create and install a new 44bsd system.
Then it would have been a FFS created by 44bsd,
not one created by netbsd...
or am I misunderstanding something?
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Jochen Kunz <jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de> wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:22:58 -1000
Tim Newsham <tim.newsham(a)gmail.com> wrote:
--
Tim Newsham | www.thenewsh.com/~newsham | thenewsh.blogspot.com
perhaps after doing netbsd -> 44bsd you should
have done another
44bsd bootstrapped -> 44bsd native install.
Ahhhmmmm. ??? That was what I did:
I used a 4.4BSD, bootstraped by
NetBSD, to bootstrap 4.4BSD. This resulted in a natively instaled
4.4BSD that run well. But it must be about 10 years ago when I did
this. So I can't give exact details.
--
\end{Jochen}
\ref{http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/}
_______________________________________________
TUHS mailing list
TUHS(a)minnie.tuhs.org
https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs