Thanks for the feedback, all.
Rand ports were done in 1977 by Sunshine/Zucker. I’ve only come across Rand Ports in the
context of V6 and the Arpa crowd 1977-1981. I’ve never seen a reference to Rand Ports on
V7 or later. This of course does not mean that it did not exist.
I’ve dug further, and it would seem that named pipes under the name ‘fifo’ appeared first
in SysIII (1980). That matches with Luderer’s remark. It does not seem to exist in the
Research editions. It only appears in BSD in the Reno release, 1990. All in all, it would
seem that ‘fifo’s were a SysV thing for most of the 80’s, with the BSD lineage using
domain sockets instead (as Clem mentioned).
Interestingly, Luderer also refers to a 1978 paper by Steve Holmgren (one of the Arpa Unix
authors), suggesting ’sockets’ (in today’s parlance) for interproces communication.
Paul
PS really nobody on the list recalls Luderer's (et al.) distributed Unix and how it
related to other work ??
On 6 Mar 2020, at 23:44, Noel Chiappa
<jnc(a)mercury.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
From: Paul Ruizendaal
The paper is from late 1981. ... When did
FIFO's become a
standard Unix feature?
Err, V4? :-) At least, that's when pipes arrived (I think - we don't have V4
sources, but there are indications that's when they appeared), and a pipe is a
FIFO. RAND ports just allowed (effectively) a pipe to have a name in the file
system.
The implementation of both is pretty straight-forward. A pipe is just a file
which has a maximum length, after which the writer is blocked. A port is
just a pipe (it uses the pipe code) whose inode appears in the file system.
From: Clem Cole
I think the code is on one of the
'USENIX' tapes in Warren's archives.
Doc is here:
https://minnie.tuhs.org//cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=BBN-V6/doc/ipc
and sources for all that are here:
https://minnie.tuhs.org//cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=BBN-V6/dmr
https://minnie.tuhs.org//cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=BBN-V6/ken
(port.c is in 'dmr', not 'ken'where it should be).
Noel