19 Jun
2023
19 Jun
'23
4:55 p.m.
At 2023-06-19T10:48:27+0000, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
Sebastien F4GRX wrote:
I could well believe it's not a typo, but a "clever" way to write
if(ap>ac) {
ap++;
return 0;
}
/* You were not expected to understand that. */
Regards,
Branden
if(ap>ac) return(0*ap++);
This was probably not intended but syntactically correct.