According to “20 years of BSD”, there was a steering committee to inform the development
of what would eventually be 4.2BSD Unix. The committee had the following members:
Duane Adams and Bob Baker: DARPA
Bob Fabry, Bill Joy, Sam Leffler: CSRG
Dennis Ritchie: Bell Labs
Alan Nemeth, Rob Gurwitz: BBN
Dan Lynch: ISI
Keith Lantz: Stanford
Rick Rashid: CMU
Bert Halstead: MIT
Jerry Popek: UCLA
I’m intrigued by the composition and the rationale for each member. Some of it is obvious,
some of it is not. According to “20 years of BSD” what DARPA wanted was:
"In particular, the new system was expected to include a faster file system that
would raise throughput to the speed of available disk technology, support processes with
multi-gigabyte address space requirements, provide flexible interprocess communication
facilities that allow researchers to do work in distributed systems, and would integrate
networking support so that machines running the new system could easily participate in the
ARPAnet."
As I understand Duane Adams was the contract manager and Bob Baker a DARPA vice-president.
The CSRG crowd are also clear, they were going to do the work.
Then it becomes less clear.
I can certainly see the logic of asking dmr to provide his guidance, also in view of Bell
Labs expertise in working with large scale communication systems. I can also see the logic
of having the BBN and ISI folk there, representing the Arpanet community and doing the
work on the new TCP/IP protocol stack.
I’m not sure about the four others. They seem to be one each for 4 main computer science
schools in the US at the time. Rashid and Popek had moreover recently completed
distributed systems (Aleph and LOCUS). Halstead seems to have been working on messaging
systems at the time. I’m not sure what Lantz’ spike was at the time.
All in all, a strong focus on distributed systems and messaging. No people with apparent
links to virtual memory research or disk access research. Other than dmr, no research
people from industry. For example, nobody from Xerox Parc. Nobody from IBM, HP, DEC, DG,
etc.
Any and all recollections about the committee and its composition welcome.