On 6 November 2017 at 19:36, Ron Natalie <ron(a)ronnatalie.com> wrote:
It’s worse than that. “char” is defined as neither
signed nor unsigned.
The signedness is implementation defined. This was why we have the inane
“signed” keyword.
What was that story about porting an early UNIX to a machine with
different char polarity? I dimly recall only a few problems.
N.