Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au> wrote:
I don't know, I thought that it would give people
more flexibility,
and shield people from stuff they didn't want to see. So lets ask:
If you're on the PUPS list, do you want to see stuff about non PDP-11 Unixes?
Yes!
If you're on the BUPS list, do you want to see
stuff about PDP-11 Unixes.
Yes!
Personally, I think it's a bad idea to have two separate societies/lists. After
all, in many case PDP-11 UNIX and VAX UNIX are the same code compiled for
different CPUs, and these lists are not about binary-only OSes, are they?
If it's all fundamentally the same code, it should be on one list, regardless
of what CPUs people want to compile it for.
I'm also a little troubled by the word "preservation". This word suggests
the
group acknowledges that these systems are "old" or "historical".
4.3BSD is
being _ACTIVELY WORKED ON_ (by me) as I type, and I have been under the
impression that 2.11BSD is also being actively worked on by Steven M. Schults.
Sure, these systems WILL be "old" or "historical" if we just sit and
"preserve"
them, but IMHO this is NOT what we should do. We should look and act and behave
AS IF these systems were brand new. I.e, run them in production on the net
competing with Pentiums and SPARCs, and actually MAKE thse systems new by doing
active development work on the sources just like the dev teams for "new" OSes
do. If we can't build a time machine, let's shut all doors and windows and
create a 1980s world inside!
So, with these ideas in mind, why not call ourselves TUUDS, True UNIX User and
Developer Society?
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA02203
for pups-liszt; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 21:13:34 +1000 (EST)
From Stacy Minkin <stacy(a)asia.uznet.net> Fri Jul
31 21:12:16 1998
Received: from
harrier.Uznet.NET (
harrier.ml.org [193.220.92.194])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA02197
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 21:13:01 +1000 (EST)
Received: (from stacy@localhost)
by
harrier.Uznet.NET (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA03207
for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 16:12:16 +0500
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 16:12:16 +0500
From: Stacy Minkin <stacy(a)asia.uznet.net>
Message-Id: <199807311112.QAA03207(a)harrier.Uznet.NET>
To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Thoughts...
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
Hi All!
From: msokolov(a)blackwidow.SOML.CWRU.Edu (Michael
Sokolov)
I'm also a little troubled by the word
"preservation". This word suggests the
group acknowledges that these systems are "old" or "historical".
4.3BSD is
being _ACTIVELY WORKED ON_ (by me) as I type, and I have been under the
impression that 2.11BSD is also being actively worked on by Steven M. Schults.
Sure, these systems WILL be "old" or "historical" if we just sit and
"preserve"
them, but IMHO this is NOT what we should do. We should look and act and behave
AS IF these systems were brand new. I.e, run them in production on the net
competing with Pentiums and SPARCs, and actually MAKE thse systems new by doing
active development work on the sources just like the dev teams for "new" OSes
do. If we can't build a time machine, let's shut all doors and windows and
create a 1980s world inside!
Absolutely right! The only problem with it that old CPUs are
seems to be slowly vaporizing... I spent about ten years searching
until I finally got original Digital PDP-11 here in Uzbekistan (xUSSR) !
And I succeeded only because I started working for Digital here.
Stacy.
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA02334
for pups-liszt; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 21:58:54 +1000 (EST)
From Tim Bradshaw <tfb(a)aiai.ed.ac.uk> Fri Jul 31
21:54:50 1998
Received: from aiai.ed.ac.uk (eigg.aiai.ed.ac.uk [129.215.41.7])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA02329;
Fri, 31 Jul 1998 21:58:48 +1000 (EST)
Received: from dubh.aiai.ed.ac.uk (dubh.aiai.ed.ac.uk [129.215.105.17])
by aiai.ed.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA16048;
Fri, 31 Jul 1998 12:54:50 +0100 (BST)
Received: (tfb@localhost) by dubh.aiai.ed.ac.uk (8.6.13/8.6.12) id MAA03301; Fri, 31 Jul
1998 12:54:50 +0100
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 12:54:50 +0100
Message-Id: <199807311154.MAA03301(a)dubh.aiai.ed.ac.uk>
From: Tim Bradshaw <tfb(a)aiai.ed.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au
Cc: grog(a)lemis.com (Greg Lehey), rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu,
pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au, bups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: OUPS (was: PUPS and BUPS (burp!) thoughts.....)
In-Reply-To: <199807310120.LAA08798(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
References: <19980731094513.U7830(a)freebie.lemis.com>
<199807310120.LAA08798(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
X-Mailer: VM 6.32 under 19.14 XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
If you're on the PUPS list, do you want to see
stuff about non PDP-11 Unixes?
If you're on the BUPS list, do you want to see
stuff about PDP-11 Unixes.
I'm on both, I'm interested in stuff about both. I would have thought
that the overlap is fairly large.
--tim
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA02319
for pups-liszt; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 21:56:18 +1000 (EST)
From Tim Bradshaw <tfb(a)aiai.ed.ac.uk> Fri Jul 31
21:55:32 1998
Received: from aiai.ed.ac.uk (eigg.aiai.ed.ac.uk [129.215.41.7])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA02314;
Fri, 31 Jul 1998 21:55:58 +1000 (EST)
Received: from dubh.aiai.ed.ac.uk (dubh.aiai.ed.ac.uk [129.215.105.17])
by aiai.ed.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA16054;
Fri, 31 Jul 1998 12:55:33 +0100 (BST)
Received: (tfb@localhost) by dubh.aiai.ed.ac.uk (8.6.13/8.6.12) id MAA03303; Fri, 31 Jul
1998 12:55:32 +0100
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 12:55:32 +0100
Message-Id: <199807311155.MAA03303(a)dubh.aiai.ed.ac.uk>
From: Tim Bradshaw <tfb(a)aiai.ed.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djenner(a)halcyon.com
Cc: bups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au, pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: OUPS (was: PUPS and BUPS (burp!) thoughts.....)
In-Reply-To: <35C138FB.A77E57E3(a)halcyon.com>
References: <199807310120.LAA08798(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
<35C138FB.A77E57E3(a)halcyon.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.32 under 19.14 XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
* David C Jenner wrote:
I vote for one list. Leave it PUPS, and call it the
Past/Prehistoric/Perpetual Unix Preservation Society
or something like that. Or think up a "P" adjective
that glorifies the olden Unix.
Proper Unix Preservation Society!
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA02386
for pups-liszt; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 22:19:42 +1000 (EST)