10 Aug
2022
10 Aug
'22
4:49 a.m.
And, of course, it should be noted that $50K was significantly more than
typical annual salaries for researchers back then.
On 8/9/2022 3:58 PM, Marc Donner wrote:
LOL
I joined IBM Research in Yorktown in 1978. I was an electrical engineer
and one of the first problems I was given was modeling a novel concept
for an X-Y touch panel. I realized that the model is basically solving
Laplace's equation in the plane. I was not a programmer at the time, so
I asked what was the recommended thing for that. I was told APL, so I
grabbed a manual and got to work.
Within a day or two I had a nice solver working and was getting useful
results.
(Of course, solving Laplace in the plane by relaxation is the slowest
possible way to get to the answer, but I didn't know much about
numerical methods back in those days.)
The next week I got a visit from the same IT weenies who had bothered
you. They told me that in my first week on the job I had managed to be
the biggest consumer of CPU cycles on the 370/168 and that I had to
learn to program in PL/I because compiled was better than interpreted.
It took me several weeks to get it working, since PL/I was such a pain
in the neck and I had to learn all sorts of stuff about how numbers were
represented in the hardware.
Obviously my time was worth less than the computer's.
Bleh.
=====
nygeek.net <http://nygeek.net>
mindthegapdialogs.com/home <https://www.mindthegapdialogs.com/home>
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 4:43 PM Charles H Sauer (he/him)
<sauer(a)technologists.com <mailto:sauer@technologists.com>> wrote:
Early on in my career at IBM Yorktown, ca. 1976, I was submitting many
long running simulation jobs to the 360/91 there. At one point, the
head
of computer systems (I.T. if you will) wrote to the head of computer
sciences (my department) complaining that I had just spent $50K over
some short period, asking if this was justified. My management shrugged
it off, encouraged me to continue what I was doing. I might still have
the letter somewhere.
A couple of years later, while on the faculty at U.T. Austin, one of
the
main budgetary items in research grant proposals was purchase of
mini-computers, assuming those were a more efficient use of funds than
paying for time at the campus computing center (then using CDC 6600 and
successors).
COFF?
Charlie
On 8/9/2022 3:19 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
--
voice: +1.512.784.7526 e-mail: sauer(a)technologists.com
fax: +1.512.346.5240 Web: https://technologists.com/sauer/
Facebook/Google/Twitter: CharlesHSauer
Computing budgets were tiny: You had only so many
$$$ for your
runs and
if you made
too many, you'd run out of $$$ before you were done (more
applicable as
a student than
as a professional post school though). Consequently your time was
plentiful and
computer time was scarce.
--
voice: +1.512.784.7526 e-mail: sauer(a)technologists.com
<mailto:sauer@technologists.com>
fax: +1.512.346.5240 Web: https://technologists.com/sauer/
Facebook/Google/Twitter
<https://technologists.com/sauer/Facebook/Google/Twitter>: CharlesHSauer