3 Aug
1998
3 Aug
'98
9:14 a.m.
Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au> writes:
I wanted to avoid the word `preservation', as
people like Steven,
Michael and others are still maintaining, using and developing these
systems.
Yes!
However, later you write:
My next suggestion is
/The UNIX Heritage Society/i
Nee, see below.
David C. Jenner <djenner(a)halcyon.com> writes:
If this is the case, the "Preservation" part
of PUPS is OK, since
what we are trying to do is preserve the use of this strain of
system software.
No, no, PLEASE get rid of that "preservation" stigma. It's like a brand
on a slave, a constant reminder of limits and constraints. Terms like
"preservation", "historical", "heritage",
"primordial", "ancient", etc. all
suggest something of purely historical value. This is EXTREMELY insulting
to those of us for whom True UNIX(R) is the ONLY multiuser operating
system.
Primordial Unix Preservation Society.
Same problem. Why not Proper UNIX(R) Patriot Society?
(I really don't want to change my
"pups" email alias!)
I agree. Hence my suggestion above.
Sincerely,
Michael Sokolov
Phone: 216-368-6888 (Office) 440-449-0299 (Home) 216-217-2579 (Cellular)
ARPA Internet SMTP mail: msokolov(a)blackwidow.CWRU.Edu
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA12441
for pups-liszt; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 13:14:13 +1000 (EST)