And I should added I do miss inetd.conf in both cases.
Sent from my PDP-7 Running UNIX V0 expect things to be almost but not quite.
On Aug 29, 2018, at 9:14 PM, Clem cole
<clemc(a)ccc.com> wrote:
Truth is I think IBM beat Sun on getting loadable modules for the kernel out first. But
I was counting the versions that people really looked at which is why I give Linux credit.
It makes sense they modeled on SunOS btw but the fact is the Linux version is what folks
like *BSD and macOS modeled after later.
Btw you are 100% right - As for launchd I agree/no doubt - but I’d already given up on
MacOS being able to be admin’ed like a Unix box. I can pretty much use it via iterm2 as a
user like one and if mostly works as I expect (which I do appreciate).
Linux is seductive enough to make think I should be able to admin it like I have for the
last 40 years and it then bites me when I least expect it.
Sent from my PDP-7 Running UNIX V0 expect things to be almost but not quite.
>> On Aug 29, 2018, at 7:36 PM, Larry McVoy <lm(a)mcvoy.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 08:34:05AM +1000, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, Clem Cole wrote:
>>> That said, I give the Linux folks great credit for the addition of modules
>>> was huge and it took BSD and the other UNIX systems a few years really
>>> pick up that idea in the same way (yes Solaris, Tru64 and eventually HPUX
>>> etc.. had something too but again - my comment about being generally
>>> available applies).
>>
>> Wasn't SunOS first with dynamic kernel modules, or is my memory worse than
I
>> thought? Linux may have been around at the time, but we never used in the
>> shop until much later (Red Hat, nicknamed Dead Rat).
>
> Yep. And Linux has loadable modules because I posted the SunOS 4.x man
> pages for the SunOS loadable modules to the kernel list. Proving once
> again that the open source guys aren't always the greatest at coming up
> with the ideas but once you show them that it can be done, it gets done
> quickly. I think they had a prototype working in a week.
>
>> Never mind "systemd"; I'm having enough trouble coming to grips
with
>> "launchd" on the Mac... Gimme /etc/inetd.conf any time.
>
> Amen, brother.