16 Mar
1998
16 Mar
'98
7:25 a.m.
Maybe I'm just being overly pedantic, or maybe I don't understand US
customs that well, but I can't work out where to sign the SCO license
agreement. Can anybody tell me?
Greg
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA11521
for pups-liszt; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 16:01:49 +1100 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to
owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au> Mon
Mar 16 15:02:01 1998
Received: from henry.cs.adfa.oz.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au
[131.236.21.158])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA11516
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 16:01:44 +1100 (EST)
Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA02064 for
pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 16:02:01 +1100 (EST)
From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199803160502.QAA02064(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Where do you sign the SCO License agreement
To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (PDP Unix Preservation)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 16:02:01 +1100 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <19980316115531.52411(a)freebie.lemis.com> from Greg Lehey at "Mar
16, 98 11:55:31 am"
Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
In article by Greg Lehey:
Maybe I'm just being overly pedantic, or maybe I
don't understand US
customs that well, but I can't work out where to sign the SCO license
agreement. Can anybody tell me?
Should I put this in the getlicense web page?
Warren
F. The AUTHORIZED COUNTRY for this Agreement shall be ______________________.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives.
LICENSEE: THE SANTA CRUZ OPERATION, INC.
__________________________________ <--- Greg Lehey Mr
Name Title
__________________________________ <--- Your address
Address
__________________________________
Address
__________________________________
Address
__________________________________
By <---- Ignore, hangover from old
AT&T licences where
__________________________________ organisational license
Print or Type Name and title (named above) is authorised
by an individual (here)
__________________________________
Phone and FAX, please <--- Phone, fax, email address
__________________________________
Email address - required
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA12553
for pups-liszt; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 16:40:49 +1100 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to
owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
From Greg Lehey <grog(a)lemis.com> Mon Mar 16
15:40:15 1998
Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com
[192.109.197.134])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA12548
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 16:40:37 +1100 (EST)
Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137])
by allegro.lemis.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA07244;
Mon, 16 Mar 1998 16:10:17 +1030 (CST)
Received: (from grog@localhost)
by freebie.lemis.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id QAA25226;
Mon, 16 Mar 1998 16:10:17 +1030 (CST)
(envelope-from grog)
Message-ID: <19980316161015.07896(a)freebie.lemis.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 16:10:15 +1030
From: Greg Lehey <grog(a)lemis.com>
To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au, PDP Unix Preservation <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Where do you sign the SCO License agreement
References: <19980316115531.52411(a)freebie.lemis.com>
<199803160502.QAA02064(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89i
In-Reply-To: <199803160502.QAA02064(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>; from Warren Toomey on Mon,
Mar 16, 1998 at 04:02:01PM +1100
WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog
Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia
Phone: +61-8-8388-8286
Fax: +61-8-8388-8725
Mobile: +61-41-739-7062
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
On Mon, 16 March 1998 at 16:02:01 +1100, Warren Toomey wrote:
In article by Greg Lehey:
A good idea, but...
I hate to appear obtuse, but this doesn't tell me either. Are you
saying I should sign where it says "By"?
Greg
Maybe I'm just being overly pedantic, or
maybe I don't understand US
customs that well, but I can't work out where to sign the SCO license
agreement. Can anybody tell me?
Should I put this in the getlicense web page? F. The AUTHORIZED COUNTRY for this Agreement shall be
______________________.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives.
LICENSEE: THE SANTA CRUZ OPERATION, INC.
__________________________________ <--- Greg Lehey Mr
Name Title
__________________________________ <--- Your address
Address
__________________________________
Address
__________________________________
Address
__________________________________
By <---- Ignore, hangover from old
AT&T licences where
__________________________________ organisational license
Print or Type Name and title (named above) is authorised
by an individual (here)
__________________________________
Phone and FAX, please <--- Phone, fax, email address
__________________________________
Email address - required
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA12594
for pups-liszt; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 16:44:01 +1100 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to
owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au> Mon
Mar 16 15:44:09 1998
Received: from henry.cs.adfa.oz.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au
[131.236.21.158])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA12586
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 16:43:52 +1100 (EST)
Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA02167 for
pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 16:44:09 +1100 (EST)
From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199803160544.QAA02167(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Where do you sign the SCO License agreement
To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (PDP Unix Preservation)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 16:44:09 +1100 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <19980316161015.07896(a)freebie.lemis.com> from Greg Lehey at "Mar
16, 98 04:10:15 pm"
Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
In article by Greg Lehey:
On Mon, 16 March 1998 at 16:02:01 +1100, Warren Toomey
wrote:
No, just fill in the top section. Leave the `by' section alone, as you
ARE your own representative.
The only time you'd fill out the bottom section is if you were buying
a license for a company, e.g
Sproggs Inc.
5 Looney road,
SPOTSWOLD. NSW. 2001
by
Warren Toomey
etc etc etc.
Hope this helps.
Warren
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA12928
for pups-liszt; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 17:58:46 +1100 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to
owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
In article by Greg Lehey:
A good idea, but...
I hate to appear obtuse, but this doesn't tell me either. Are you
saying I should sign where it says "By"? Maybe I'm just being overly pedantic, or
maybe I don't understand US
customs that well, but I can't work out where to sign the SCO license
agreement. Can anybody tell me?
Should I put this in the getlicense web page? From Stacy Minkin <stacy(a)asia.uznet.net> Mon Mar
16 17:00:16 1998
Received: from asia.Uznet.NET (asia.uznet.net [193.220.92.23])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA12923
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 17:58:30 +1100 (EST)
Received: (from stacy@localhost)
by asia.Uznet.NET (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA00643
for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 12:00:16 +0500
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 12:00:16 +0500
From: Stacy Minkin <stacy(a)asia.uznet.net>
Message-Id: <199803160700.MAA00643(a)asia.Uznet.NET>
To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: RQDX3 problems
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
Hi pdp people!
Few days ago I wrote about my hardware problems and asked
for hardware guru. Now I've solved some of them -
I checked my backplane and it was 18-bits I wired
insufficient A19-A21 signals and my CPU acessed memory and
now it runs ok. But! I still do not know what happens to
my RQDX3!
I know that this question has little relation to UNIX
and apologize for that.
I hardly suspect circuitry fault but may be some
other reasons. It looks like this:
-My RQDX3 is now connected to simple 5-inch floppy drive
when I power up the machine I see no activity on ANY
pin of RQDX3 to RQDX SIG. DIST. 50-pin connector! I mean
there is no triggering signals hence my floppy
also does nothing. When I try to execute bootstrap or
simply debug RQDX3 registers from console it looks like this:
RESET
CLR @#1772150
<checking 1772152 - it holds 5500 - kinda normal>
MOV #100000,@#1772152 ; controller passes INIT step 1
; no ints enabled, no vector specified,
; UDA OWN bit set. Rings are zero length
<checking 1772152 - it holds 10000 - step one passed>
MOV #xxxxxx,@#1772152 ; controller passes INIT step 2
; specifying low address bits
<checking 1772152 - it holds 20000 or something alike -
no error bit is set - I'm sure- step2 passed>
MOV #0,@#1772152 ; controller passes INIT step 3 - specifying
; high address bits>
<here we can wait for eternity!!!!!!!! Step 3 will never complete>
Does anybody know what does it mean? I also have TMSCP TQK70
controller but no tape drive for it. When I try to run it there
is absolutely similar situation - I think this happens each time
[T]MSCP controller tries to powerup without any drives connected to it.
So I'm looking for help from somebody who can give a hint
about which signal should i check to assertain in absence of hardware fault.
I have no drawings for RQDX3 neither user's guide. It can even be caused
by wrong setting of switches/jumpers - I dont know.
Stacy.
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA14297
for pups-liszt; Tue, 17 Mar 1998 02:41:35 +1100 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to
owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
From "David C. Jenner"
<djenner(a)halcyon.com> Tue Mar 17 01:41:14 1998
Received: from
mgate.nwnexus.com (beavis.nwnexus.com [206.63.63.200])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA14292
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 17 Mar 1998 02:41:29 +1100 (EST)
Received: from halcyon.com (tide22.microsoft.com [131.107.3.32])
by mgate.nwnexus.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA17334;
Mon, 16 Mar 1998 07:41:17 -0800
Message-ID: <350D481A.DAA7B5A4(a)halcyon.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 07:41:14 -0800
From: "David C. Jenner" <djenner(a)halcyon.com>
Reply-To: djenner(a)halcyon.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au
CC: PDP Unix Preservation <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Where do you sign the SCO License agreement
References: <199803160544.QAA02167(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
Greg,
Since none of the responses seem to really answer your question,
here's what I did:
I signed my name on the very first line where it says "Name".
I then printed my name on the line where it says "Print or Type Name".
If this is incorrect, I guess I'll get it back!
Dave
Warren Toomey wrote:
In article by Greg Lehey:
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA15691
for pups-liszt; Tue, 17 Mar 1998 09:45:45 +1100 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to
owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
On Mon, 16 March 1998 at 16:02:01 +1100, Warren
Toomey wrote:
No, just fill in the top section. Leave the `by' section alone, as you
ARE your own representative.
The only time you'd fill out the bottom section is if you were buying
a license for a company, e.g
Sproggs Inc.
5 Looney road,
SPOTSWOLD. NSW. 2001
by
Warren Toomey
etc etc etc.
Hope this helps.
Warren In article by Greg Lehey:
A good idea, but...
I hate to appear obtuse, but this doesn't tell me either. Are you
saying I should sign where it says "By"? Maybe I'm just being overly pedantic, or
maybe I don't understand US
customs that well, but I can't work out where to sign the SCO license
agreement. Can anybody tell me?
Should I put this in the getlicense web page?