29 Jan
2021
29 Jan
'21
3:15 a.m.
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Hellwig Geisse wrote:
Ah, I see; thanks. Sometimes I'm too pedantic for my own good :-)
-- Dave
That would
evaluate to a constant being printed (it's a direct array
reference). Did you mean something like "...[i]" instead? That would
indeed be neat...
I think it doesn't matter if the index expression is a constant
expression or not. The point here, as I understood, is the definition of
an unnamed (and not explicitly typed) array "on the fly".