8 Jan
2020
8 Jan
'20
2:45 a.m.
On 1/7/20 10:50 AM, Thomas Paulsen wrote:
If we're really doing this editor size contest thing, I'll submit my `ce'
editor. (ftp://ftp.cwru.edu/pub/chet/ce-4.8.tar.gz) It's emacs-like, but
not particularly configurable, and the defaults, strangely enough, are
exactly what I like.
On my Mac OS X machine, it's about ten times smaller than vim
$ size /usr/local/bin/ce
__TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex
114688 339968 0 4295024640 4295479296 10007d000
$ size /usr/bin/vim
__TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex
1687552 176128 0 4295016448 4296880128 1001d3000
Similar numbers on RHEL 7, but due to the large bss, it's only about
45% smaller than vim.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet(a)case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
It was so
excesssive right from the start that I refused to use it.
Sam was the first screen editor that I deemed worthwhile, and I
still use it today.
my sam build is more than 2 times bigger than Gunnar
Ritter's vi (or Steve Kirkendall's elvis) and even bigger than Bram
Moolenaar's vim.