28 Mar
2016
28 Mar
'16
6:37 p.m.
Thanks for some additional information.
On 2016-03-28 18:16, Milo Velimirović wrote:
This is also a pretty important point. But one which also begs the question how the
splxxx() functions in Unix worked back then. Or did Unix not use this pattern and these
functions back when the 11/40 was relevant?
These functions existed in V6 and can be found in the file, m40.s, that was assembled
with the rest of the kernel to generate a unix that would run on a /40 class machine.
Aha. Great. Thanks. Yes, BIS and BIC on the PSW obviously works, but
this would definitely not block interrupts for the next instruction. So
at least in that case, a WAIT could result in the kernel sitting around
waiting for the next interrupt. I don't really think DEC intend WAIT to
be used in the way Unix uses it, and it don't really have the properties
that would be ideas for Unix. Also somewhat indicated by the fact that
DEC did not use WAIT this way themselves.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt(a)softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Mar 28, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Johnny Billquist
<bqt(a)update.uu.se> wrote:
On 2016-03-28 16:18, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> > From: Dave Horsfall <dave(a)horsfall.org>
>
[ Wait & RK discussion snipped.]
I know
that Kevin Dawson (I think) tried it on my /40 as well
The 11/40 does not have the SPL instruction; see the '75-'76 PDP-11 Processor
Handbook, pg. 4-5. (Again, sorry, just want to be accurate.)