19 Jun
2024
19 Jun
'24
8:53 p.m.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 08:44:14AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024, 7:28???AM Larry McVoy
<lm(a)mcvoy.com> wrote:
Yeah, I lost that battle. I prefer, and carry around the sources to, a
make from Unix. It's simple and does what I need. But my guys convinced
me there was enough value in gmake that we used it. I tried to keep
the craziness to a minimum. And I think I succeeded, I can fix bugs in
that Makefile.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 07:46:15PM -0500, Nevin
Liber wrote:
The posted Makefile is no a strictly conforming POSIX Makefile, but uses
gmake extensions extensively... And eyes of the beholder may vary... But I'll bite. There was the claim by Larry
McVoy that "Writing
Makefiles
isn't that hard".
Please show these beautiful makefiles for a non-toy non-trivial product
Works on *BSD, MacOS, Windows, Linux on a bunch of different architectures,
Solaris, HPUX, AIX, IRIX, Tru64, etc.