On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Dan Cross wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:39 AM Nemo Nusquam
<cym224(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In earlier days, my wife was given email by
telnetting to an SGI system
and using elm. One day, I visited her office as she was composing a
message. Intrigued, I asked her what the editor was. She did not know
and pointed to her cheat-sheet listing editor commands. One was ^X^C to
exit-and-send. She is not a programmer and I was a bit surprised at
their choice.
Hmm, I'm actually kind of not. Starting users off with a modal editor (that
starts in command mode, no less!) can be surprising for novices; with
emacs, at least you can start typing text and, well, see text.
This is one of the reasons I liked E when I first used it: it was modal,
but it started in edit mode. (Also you KNEW what mode you were in, which
I understand isn't always the case with vi, although it usually is in the
clones iirc?)
I think that one of the smartest things Marc Crispin
ever did was write
`pico` to go with `pine`. A simple editor targeted at the novice was really
useful for casual and/or new users, particularly as the Internet spread and
an account on a Unix system was the default introduction to email etc for
so many.
And I still use nano - which is a rewrite of pico.
pico Just Works(R)(TM)(C), and it's not enormous. nano adds a few things
I like, but the UI is the same. Heck...I still use PINE and am sending
this message from it ;)
-uso.