5 Jun
2009
5 Jun
'09
8:40 p.m.
Brian S Walden scripsit:
Not a bad article, really, but <rant>I do get very tired of this rigid
separation of Linux and Unix. No, Linux doesn't have any AT&T code,
but there isn't all that much left in Solaris or *BSD either (other
than header files and such). And no, Linux distros aren't Unix-branded
at present, but FWIU, that's because certification is neither fast nor
cheap, and applies only to a given release. Commercial Linuxes have fast
release cycles, and Debian, whose release cycles are slow, can't afford
certification. But in terms of actual, rather than formal, compliance,
Linux is as much a Unix as any branded Unix.</rant>
--
The first thing you learn in a lawin' family John Cowan
is that there ain't no definite answers cowan(a)ccil.org
to anything. --Calpurnia in To Kill A Mockingbird