17 Sep
2017
17 Sep
'17
11:19 a.m.
RMS wrote GCC initially. And Emacs if that's what you use. And GDB
initially as well. RMS did Texinfo (even if you don't like it yourself,
it's a very nice markup language).
Bash, gawk, sed, grep, coreutils were (and still are) maintained by
unpaid volunteers, true, but they all were started for the GNU project.
(Bash in the early days may have been funded by the FSF.)
You're welcome to stand by your comment, but --- as a GNU maintainer for
close to 30 years --- I think you paint with too broad a brush.
More than enough said,
Arnold
Larry McVoy <lm(a)mcvoy.com> wrote:
I stand by my comment. I'm friends with the
Cygnus folks, they would
tend to agree with me I think.
All that stuff you listed, can you list the things that the GNU/FSF
people have funded? Because I think there is close to nothing. All of
that stuff is stuff that came under the GNU umbrella but they didn't do
the coding.
I give credit to RMS for the GPL, that was cool. But claiming credit
for stuff that GNU/FSF didn't do was not cool.
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 01:20:00PM -0600, arnold(a)skeeve.com wrote:
Larry McVoy <lm(a)mcvoy.com> wrote:
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at mcvoy.com http://www.mcvoy.com/lm The GNU guys have written very, very little code.
Um, let's see: Bash. gawk. sed. grep. coreutils. binutils. gcc. ...
Essentially everything that was used from the command line on a
standard Unix system. All reimplemented from scratch.
Many GNU maintainers are active (directly or indirectly) in the
POSIX standard efforts which influences all Unix implementations.
They are all about the license, which is fine,
but I get off the bus
when they are claiming credit for work they did not do.
This not true of ALL the GNU project maintainers. Don't tar everyone
with RMS's brush.
'nuff said,
And, IMHO, all this is WAY off topic and probably should be brought
to a close.
Arnold