Some UPSTART named RMS in his whole odipherous spledor couldn't even spell LINUX.
If you read his earlier manifesto rants he hated UNIX with a passion.
Holding out the TOPS operating systems as the be-all and end-all of user interface.
Despite his disingenous propaganda, he didn't invent LINUX (or any other UNIX
clone).
RMS didn't even enter onto the UNIX scene until after he had been burned by
LMI/Symbolics/MIT over contributions he made to the Lisp Machine that he assumed would
always be freely available. I was a rather late comer to UNIX, having not started on
it until 1977, RMS wasn't anywhere around until over a decade later.
I was happy that Ken and Dennis and the folks were coming up with the design pattern and
not worrying about every single bug in the system. This was RESEARCH. Those of us in
the direct trenches at the places that got UNIX under the "scrap metal"
provisions got to make our own contribution by increasing robustness and performance as
well as extended the underlying paradigm.
yeah, that's not really sporting. I've
always wondered about something else, though: Were the original Unix authors annoyed when
they learned that some irascible young upstart named Richard Stallman was determined to
make a free Unix clone? Was he a gadfly, or just some kook you decided to ignore? The
fathers of Unix have been strangely silent on this topic for many years. Maybe
nobody's ever asked?
_______________________________________________
TUHS mailing list
TUHS(a)minnie.tuhs.org
https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs