6 Nov
2020
6 Nov
'20
9:18 p.m.
On Nov 6, 2020, at 7:06 AM, Larry McVoy <lm(a)mcvoy.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 05:37:25PM +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
In Acme almost always I use variable width font but I still adjust column
width to 80 (for a monospaced font). That way on a full screen on MBP
I get a number of regular width columns and one narrow one which I use
to keep my to do list or to note key points. 80 columns is a compromise
that allows one to make better use of the screen real estate. I format text
or comments in narrower columns so that you can read straight down
instead of zigaziing down. Switching columns implies switching context.
Lazyness is the mother of invention!
Not sure what this has to do with "Unix as Literature"!
On Friday, 6 November 2020 at 0:04:28 -0500,
John Cowan wrote:
Exactly this. I'm a very fast reader, easily 2-3x the average. I read by
running my eyes down the middle of the page and get the left and right
from peripheral vision. It's super fast but it doesn't work when you
get much bigger than 80 columns.
Even if you read normally, the wider it is, the more back and forth your
eyes do so less is more.
It's also why I'm fine with smaller screens, I tried the giant apple
displays and found that those required head movement along with eye
movement.
I'm lazy. On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 8:41 PM Larry McVoy
<lm(a)mcvoy.com> wrote:
I think you're jumping to conclusions. The importance of 80
characters (for small values of 80) is that it's a comfortable text
width for human eyes. I click but I mostly live in terminal windows.
Which are all 80
columns because that's the right width (I can go on and on about
that).
Aw, c'mon. You're going to tell us that the number of punch holes
that IBM could fit on a punch card in 1928 that was exactly the size
of the dollar bill used in the U.S. from 1862 to 1923 so that it
could be stored in a mechanical cash register is miraculously the
Right Thing when it comes to reading monospaced text on a screen?