[TUHS] Re: A few comments on porting the Bourne shell

On Mon, Jan 2, 2023, 11:18 AM Clem Cole &lt;clemc(a)ccc.com&gt; wrote: I've only got 30 years experience in writing portable shell scripts... But I have a slightly different take. There is an element of luck involved. There are a number of constructs that are valid in v7 shell that aren't completely portable due to bugs in vendor shells. The luck part comes in either you know what to avoid because you got unlucky and got burned in the past. Or you got lucky and never thought to write something like that so it just works. With experience, you know what works... I notice the old timers hedged a little bit by saying things like "virtually all" so maybe they had a bit of bad luck now and again... Also, the really aweful systems are rare enough today that most folks on this list have had the good luck not to need to run on them... :) You can get super close though, but I'll bet there's some scripts that work only because they didn't run on, say, Eunice... But luck favors the prepared... and making the effort to try to be portable will help when you have to run on dash, or one of the BSD shells that might not have $<(cmd) or some other useful but not universal feature... Warner