On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 10:28:59AM -0400, Doug McIlroy wrote:
A symptom of why I have always detested emacs and vi.
EMACS - eight megs and constantly swapping :)
I like vi, there is a learning curve but what is better? I tried emacs, it
was too much for my feeble brain.
I used to carry around a version of xvi (a variant that did buffers so you
could split the screen and see two different parts of a file or two different
files). I had hacked that so it used \n as a terminator (I think I wacked
things so that \n or \0 were considered terminators) and made it use mmap
to look at the file. This meant I could fit a ~3MB file in the editor on
a 4MB machine. It was a pretty big win at the time.
Then we got more memory and then vim came along and I've never looked back.
So Doug, ed? Or what? I know some people are fantastic in ed, I used to
be OK especially when I was going in through a serial port but I can't see
using that for serious programming these days. Maybe I'm lame.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at
mcvoy.com http://www.mcvoy.com/lm