Re: [TUHS] Microsoft, SCO, and a certain License

Wes ðu hal Wesley, On Sunday, February 29, 2004, 7:34:03 AM, ure freond feorran awrat: WP> I know the SCO topic's been done to death, and all, but I was thinking about WP> the Microsoft purchase of a Unix license (apparently) for their MS SFU WP> (Windows Services For Unix) which contrary to the plain meaning of the name, WP> is essentially a Unix (apparently OpenBSD, according to rumour) box on top of WP> the Windows kernel and Win32 API. WP> The question is, wouldn't that put Microsoft and the SCO Group in breach of WP> the settlement between AT&T and Berkeley? If Win SFU _is_ OpenBSD, and WP> Microsoft have bought a license to run it from the SCO Group of all people, WP> isn't that in effect picking a fight with Theo de Raadt? Found in "ls": Copyright (c) 1991, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Copyright (c) 1996, 1998 Softway Systems Inc. $OpenBSD: strlen.c,v 1.3 1996/08/19 08:34:19 tholo Exp $ $OpenBSD: strcpy.c,v 1.4 1996/08/19 08:34:14 tholo Exp $ $OpenBSD: strncpy.c,v 1.2 1996/08/19 08:34:22 tholo Exp $ $OpenBSD: strncmp.c,v 1.3 1996/08/19 08:34:21 tholo Exp $ $OpenBSD: strlcpy.c,v 1.4 1999/05/01 18:56:41 millert Exp $ $OpenBSD: fts.c,v 1.15 1998/03/19 00:30:01 millert Exp $ $OpenBSD: strcmp.c,v 1.3 1996/08/19 08:34:12 tholo Exp $ $OpenBSD: memset.c,v 1.2 1996/08/19 08:34:07 tholo Exp $ $OpenBSD: strcat.c,v 1.4 1996/08/19 08:34:10 tholo Exp $ $OpenBSD: memchr.c,v 1.2 1996/08/19 08:34:04 tholo Exp $ There are a few OpenBSD CVS tags in libc.a as well.