One of the times I was lucky enough to be able to hire and set up what I thought would be
the place I’d want to work ( design and code ), at the beginning I did the best I could
to solve the “religious” code issues, tool issues, etc.
Code Formatting wise — we came up with a “checked-in-standard”. All code went thru a code
formatter when checking in. When it came out, we build a couple templates that
translated to formats for things that different folks wanted ( and gave folks the option
of tweaking their own ). They could use the default ( I did ). Any thing was fair game,
as long as it got checked in “in the checked in standard”. We also came up with a set of
rules for complexity, nesting. The entire team actually was able to come to agreement —
if your code didn’t violated the limit of minor or misc things ( critical and major things
had to be addressed ) it was fine. We set a limit of 1000 for minor and I think 5000 for
misc. I was surprised how far from the standard stuff looked on various folks
workstations but during code reviews we had a “common language format” we all could read
without much fuss.
We did go with a line length of <132 so if necessary we could print stuff out
landscape.
Tool wise, if it got in the way more than 50% it was gone and we’d find a new one.
Preference was for every editor, etc. to have at least two users on the team. ( so you’d
have someone to ask questions of ) And you could use an IDE as long as code had standard
makefiles when checked in.
Surprisingly this worked out quite well with a team of around 20...
Earl
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 15, 2021, at 7:48 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso
<steffen(a)sdaoden.eu> wrote:
Bakul Shah wrote in
<01BE1B3F-8745-4465-93EF-95AA83EFD494(a)iitbombay.org>:
Wonderful, i can re-answer in public, too, leaving something off.
--- Forwarded from Bakul Shah <bakul(a)iitbombay.org> ---
Maybe because alternate processing rips myself off. Sigh.
...
|Oh. Hm. I heard this on American Forces
|Network, told by Tony Scott, to which i listened from at least
|Monday to Thursday 00am to 04am (German Time). When such things
|were still possible, and thus in the first days, maybe the day it
|happened. (Before "Max" was taken offline after Tony Scott issued
|several "You can't say that on the radio", for sure.)
He surely did for years before that. But i mean, hey, just an
observation, i have no idea of american sensitivities.
|But thanks for the pointer. Haven't we had this already in the
|past? The above sounds dark and ugly to my ears, hmmmm.
Yeah i mean, this arose by the beginning of the 90s, right.
If the first examination does not reveal the desired result (but
maybe the truth even, heh), then just perform a second .. a third
one, until the result is absolutely what was wanted. Gulf war
illness, Barschel's death, W keys on the keyboard .. you name it.
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)