22 Jan
2010
22 Jan
'10
11:46 a.m.
Quoting Jochen Kunz, who wrote on Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:15:57AM +0100 ..
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:34:09 +0100
Wilko Bulte <wb(a)freebie.xs4all.nl> wrote:
Hm.. ;)
recoverable read error rate I presume.
No.
NON-recoverable read error rate: 1 per 10^14 bits. And this is for light desktop use. Heavy IO on the
disk may increase
failure rate. At least this is written in the technical data sheet of
the drive. WD drives are not that much better: 1 per 10^15 bits.
For sure: High end SAS drives have better numbers. But they cost much
more EUR / GB and require a SAS adapter...
SAS is the heir to the parallel SCSI throne, and similarly (premium) priced
Wilko
_______________________________________________
TUHS mailing list
TUHS(a)minnie.tuhs.org
https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs