5 Nov
2024
5 Nov
'24
4:50 a.m.
On Monday, 4 November 2024 at 10:35:40 -0700, Marc Rochkind wrote:
Many opinions of the evidence, especially on Groklaw,
but also
elsewhere, including here. But none of these people offering
opinions have really seen the evidence,
I think that depends on what SCO (and when) claimed as evidence. They
did present slides of obfuscated code (replacing ASCII with Greek
letters in the assumption that nobody could recognize the original and
maybe that the code was too precious to show in the orignal). I can't
find that any more, and maybe its on one of the many dead links on
http://www.lemis.com/grog/SCO/. But
http://www.lemis.com/grog/SCO/code-comparison.php refers to it and
identifies the errors in the claims.
Mostly people talk about "evidence " offered
by Darl at the
start. But NONE of the actual evidence came from him. It was
researched by a team of expert witnesses on both sides, of which I
was one.
I'd be very interested to hear what else they presented. Did your
conclusions agree with mine?
Greg
--
Sent from my desktop computer.
Finger grog(a)lemis.com for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program
reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA.php